Background: Current drug therapy for myelofibrosis does not alter the natural course of the disease or prolong survival, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only curative treatment modality. For over a decade, the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor ruxolitinib has been the standard of care. More recently, newer-generation JAK inhibitors have joined the ranks of accepted treatment options. Objectives: The primary goal of treatment is to reduce spleen size and minimize disease-related symptoms. Prognostic scoring systems are used to designate patients as being at lower or higher risk. For transplant-eligible patients, transplant is offered to those with a bridge of a JAK inhibitor; patients who are not eligible for transplant are usually offered long-term therapy with a JAK inhibitor. Limited disease-modifying activity, dose-limiting cytopenias, and other adverse effects have contributed to discontinuation of JAK inhibitor treatment. Conclusions: Novel JAK inhibitors and combination approaches are currently being explored to overcome these shortcomings. Further research will be essential to establish optimal therapeutic approaches in first-line and subsequent treatments.

Menin inhibitors are the first targeted therapies for KMT2A-rearranged and NPM1-mutated acute leukemias, addressing a significant unmet need in these high-risk subtypes. Revumenib received approval in 2024–2025 for relapsed or refractory KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia and NPM1-mutated AML. The AUG-MENT-101 trial reported a 23% composite complete remission rate in heavily pretreated patients, with 61% of responders achieving MRD negativity. Several menin inhibitors, including ziftomenib, bleximenib, and enzomenib, are in clinical development. They demonstrate similar efficacy, but their safety profiles differ, especially regarding QTc prolongation and coverage of resistance mutations. Combination therapies with azacitidine and venetoclax or intensive chemotherapy have achieved high response rates in newly diagnosed patients, supporting their potential use in frontline treatment. Acquired resistance, often due to MEN1 mutations at the drug-binding interface, occurs in about 40% of cases. Distinct resistance patterns among menin inhibitors suggest the possibility of sequential therapy. Approximately 30–40% of responders in relapsed or refractory trials proceeded to allogeneic transplantation, which remains a key pathway to potential cure. This review examines the molecular mechanisms of the menin-KMT2A interaction, and summarizes clinical trial data on the efficacy and safety of menin inhibitors as monotherapy and in combination.

Background: This real-life study aimed to investigate the possible impact of D-VTd induction therapy on hematopoietic engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT). Methods: Sixty consecutive NDMM patients received four cycles of induction therapy with D-VTd. The conditioning regimen consisted of melphalan 200 mg/m². These patients were compared with a historical control group of 80 patients who received four cycles of VTd as induction therapy. Results: The median days to reach neutrophil and platelet engraftment significantly differed between patients treated with D-VTd (11 and 13 days, respectively) and VTd (10 and 12 days). Univariate Cox analyses show that patients treated with D-VTd had a hazard ratio of neutrophil engraftment that was 42% significantly lower than those in the VTd arm (HR: 0.58, p = 0.002), and a multivariate model confirmed this result. Patients treated with D-VTd developed FN more frequently. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions revealed an association between D-VTd and FN. Delayed engraftment did not correlate with more extended hospitalization. No patients died in the first six months after transplantation. Conclusions: Our real-life study showed that a four-drug induction therapy containing DARA does not impact transplant safety outcomes.

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed the management of relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies, achieving high response rates in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. While the efficacy of CAR-T therapy is well established, quality of life (QoL) metrics have become increasingly important for guiding treatment decisions, patient counseling, and survivorship planning. Objectives: Most patients undergoing CAR-T therapy recover their initial QoL within 3 months, an improvement not typically seen with other treatment options. A comprehensive understanding of QoL is essential for delivering patient-centered care in the evolving CAR-T landscape. Conclusions: This review synthesizes current evidence on QoL outcomes in CAR-T recipients, including acute effects, recovery trajectories, comparisons with conventional therapies, and strategies to optimize QoL.