Luis Miguel Quinzo-Ortega

Mr. Luis Miguel Quinzo-Ortega

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 October 2021 in Insect Conservation and Diversity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGábor Pozsgai
Gábor Pozsgai
LQLuis Miguel Quinzo-Ortega
Luis Miguel Quinzo-Ortega
NLNick A. Littlewood
Nick A. Littlewood
Semi‐natural grasslands are commonly managed as a grazing resource for domestic livestock but, due to their unique biodiversity, they are also of conservation interest. Numerous drivers have impacted on the status of these grasslands in recent decades, most importantly changing grazing management strategies. These changes have the potential to affect the biodiversity associated with these habitats, including on some rich invertebrate assemblages. Responses, however, are often dissimilar between different invertebrate taxa. We investigated the responses of ground beetles to different grazing regimes within a replicated, controlled, long‐term grazing experiment on upland semi‐natural grassland in Scotland. Although there was substantial overlap of species composition of ground beetle assemblages in different grazing treatments, species richness, abundance and Shannon diversity of ground beetles were significantly lower in ungrazed plots than in plots subject to high‐ or low‐intensity sheep grazing. Ground beetle abundance (but not species richness or diversity) was lower in ungrazed plots compared to those with low‐intensity mixed grazing by sheep and cattle. However, no differences were identified in abundance, species richness or diversity between the three grazed treatments. Our results suggest that ground beetles may show different responses to grazing compared to responses of some other invertebrate groups and demonstrate the difficulty of attempting to manage grazing to optimise conditions for a wide range of invertebrates.

4 December 2024 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LQLuis Miguel Quinzo-Ortega
Luis Miguel Quinzo-Ortega
WSWilliam Swaney
William Swaney
RMRoger Moore
Roger Moore
RRRobbie G. Rae
Robbie G. Rae
Christopher WilliamsChristopher Williams
Christopher Williams
The large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.) is a major pest in European and Asian coniferous forests, particularly in managed plantations where clear-felling practices create ideal conditions for its population growth. Traditional management practices involving synthetic insecticides have limited efficacy in terms of reducing pest populations and pose environmental risks. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a wild entomopathogenic fungus (EPF) and the commercial entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae (EPN) as biological control agents (BCAs) against H. abietis in clear-felled spruce plantations in Wales and Scotland. Field trials used a randomised block design with three treatments (EPN full dose, EPF full dose and a combination of EPF+EPN at half doses each) compared to a control. Emergence trapping and destructive sampling were employed to assess treatment efficacy. All treatments significantly reduced weevil emergence, with the mixed treatment showing the greatest impact. Destructive sampling revealed strong associations between treatment type and infection outcomes in H. abietis, with a small but significant relationship between weevil developmental stages and infection types. Importantly, the treatments had no significant impact on the total abundance or taxon richness of non-target invertebrates. These findings suggest that wild EPFs alone and combined with EPNs are effective and environmentally safe alternatives to synthetic insecticides for managing H. abietis populations in managed forests.