Background: The purpose of this study is to report the experience of a single Portuguese oncology center in the management of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and venous tumor thrombus (VTT). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all patients with RCC and VTT surgically treated in our center between 2008 and 2023. Only patients with VTT up to level III (Mayo Clinic classification) were included. Patient, tumor characteristics and peri-operative outcome data were registered. Administration of systemic therapy was performed upon progression. Survival analysis was conducted with the collected data. Results: A total of 64 patients (n = 16 women) were included in this study. The mean age at diagnosis was 66.3 ± 10.7 years old. The VTT level was 0, I, II and III in 40 (62.5%), 12 (18.7%), 6 (9.4%) and 6 (9.4%) patients, respectively. Nine patients (14.1%) had distant metastasis at diagnosis. No peri-operative deaths occurred, and the major complication rate was 3.1%. Histology revealed 98.4% of clear cell RCC, with sarcomatoid differentiation present in 12.5% of the cases. A negative margin status was achieved in 54 (84.4%) patients. Systemic therapy was administered in 24 (37.5%) patients during follow-up. The median progression-free (PFS), cancer-specific (CSS) and overall (OS) survival were 23, 60 and 48 months, respectively. In multivariable analysis, significant predictors of CSS were tumor size, sarcomatoid differentiation and collecting system invasion. Conclusions: Radical nephrectomy with VTT excision up to level III is a feasible and safe procedure. Patients with large tumor size, sarcomatoid differentiation and collecting system invasion are at the highest risk and should be closely monitored.

The Central European Journal of Urology is an open access quarterly-issued journal, which provides a forum for the presentation of original clinical, experimental and other research studies...

Introduction: Kidney transplantation requires immunosuppression, traditionally regarded as a risk factor for progression in all malignancies. Based on the Cincinnati Registry, a waiting period before transplantation is therefore mandatory. However, recent evidence suggests this increased risk is restricted to particular tumors, whereas others like renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are not negatively affected. We aimed to compare oncological outcomes of RCC in native kidneys of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, according to their transplantation or dialysis status. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of all ESRD patients diagnosed with RCC between 2010 and 2020 in our center. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariable Cox regression model was used to evaluate their association with kidney transplantation. Results: Clinical and pathological characteristics were similar between groups. Kidney transplant recipients had similar risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI) 0.04-4.46, p = 0.458) and overall survival (HR 0.34, 95%CI 0.07-1.77, p = 0.202) as dialyzed patients. On multivariable Cox regression model, presence or absence of transplantation was not significantly associated with RFS (p = 0.479) or OS (p = 0.236). Time on dialysis was the only independent predictor of worse survival (HR 1.86, 95%CI 1.18-2.93, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Most RCC in native kidneys of ESRD patients are low-grade, low-stage and exhibit favourable pathological and outcome features. Immunosuppression does not seem to have an impact on oncological outcomes, but an increased time on dialysis seems to be associated with worse overall survival. Therefore, waiting time for transplantation for these tumors could be reduced.