Companion animal endocrinology has benefited from international standardisation of disease terminology for diabetes mellitus, Cushing’s syndrome, and hypoadrenocorticism through Project Agreeing Language in Veterinary Endocrinology (ALIVE). A group of 14 experts and one chair convened for the third cycle of Project ALIVE, focusing on thyroid disease terminology. The cycle employed the modified Delphi approach from previous cycles, augmented by procedural refinements—such as inclusion of an off-site chair and stricter adherence to timelines —to improve efficiency and flexibility. Novel in this round was the integration of feedback from a previous cycle, which resulted in updated definitions for diabetes mellitus originally developed in ALIVE Cycle 1. Outcomes: A 100% consensus was achieved among panellists and 91.4–100% among 105 members of international veterinary endocrinology societies (32% of total memberships) over 78 thyroid-related terminology items and five revised definitions pertaining to diabetes mellitus. These standardised definitions are expected to facilitate clearer communication and education, enhance diagnostic consistency, support research comparability, and improve clinical care in feline and canine endocrine diseases.
Sepsis and septic shock are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in both humans and dogs, and early diagnosis is crucial for improving outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate bioactive adrenomedullin (bio-ADM) concentrations in dogs with septic shock (n = 25), dogs with sepsis without evidence of shock (n = 25), and healthy control dogs (n = 25). Plasma bio-ADM concentrations were measured using a human sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and reported as median (interquartile range). Plasma bio-ADM concentrations were significantly higher in both septic groups compared to the healthy controls (all <22.4 pg/mL), but not significantly different between the septic shock (75.0 [28.7–115.0] pg/mL) and sepsis (30.7 [22.4–79.7] pg/mL) groups. Dogs with higher illness severity scores had significantly higher bio-ADM concentrations (93.1 [32.2–122.0] pg/mL) than those with lower scores (29.8 [22.4–71.2] pg/mL). However, bio-ADM concentrations did not differ between survivors (33.0 [22.7–76.7] pg/mL) and non-survivors (74.7 [26.1–123.2] pg/mL). Measurement of bio-ADM is a potential marker for canine sepsis, but not for the identification of septic shock, and may provide information on disease severity. Further studies, including those on non-infectious inflammatory conditions, are necessary to better understand the diagnostic utility of bio-ADM measurement and its potential role as a marker of treatment response in dogs with sepsis.