Jill Urbanic

Prof. Jill Urbanic


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 July 2017 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NNNavid Nazemi
Navid Nazemi
JUJill Urbanic
Jill Urbanic
MAMohammad Alam
Mohammad Alam

11 August 2017 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMohammad K. Alam
Mohammad K. Alam
JUJill Urbanic
Jill Urbanic
NNNavid Nazemi
Navid Nazemi
AEAfsaneh Edrisy
Afsaneh Edrisy

4 January 2016 in Computer-Aided Design and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JUJill Urbanic
Jill Urbanic
RHR. Hedrick
R. Hedrick
The Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process is a bead deposition based additive manufacturing (AM) process that builds a product from thin layers of molten thermoplastic filaments. The ongoing goal of this research is to develop methodologies for designing and fabricating large complex parts such as complex beta testing prototypes, or sand casting patterns. The unique capabilities of the FDM process are leveraged when designing components and assemblies. Complex geometry can be readily manufactured allowing designers to incorporate non-standard component features, and consider unique solutions; however, there are size, surface finish, and accuracy limitations. Rules are developed to leverage the process characteristics and address the observed limitations. Case studies are presented to highlight the benefits and challenges when using the FDM process.

4 January 2016 in Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JUJill Urbanic
Jill Urbanic
SSS. M. Saqib
S. M. Saqib
KAK. Aggarwal
K. Aggarwal
Developing a bead shape to process parameter model is challenging due to the multiparameter, nonlinear, and dynamic nature of the laser cladding (LC) environment. This introduces unique predictive modeling challenges for both single bead and overlapping bead configurations. It is essential to develop predictive models for both as the boundary conditions for overlapping beads are different from a single bead configuration. A single bead model provides insight with respect to the process characteristics. An overlapping model is relevant for process planning and travel path generation for surface cladding operations. Complementing the modeling challenges is the development of a framework and methodologies to minimize experimental data collection while maximizing the goodness of fit for the predictive models for additional experimentation and modeling. To facilitate this, it is important to understand the key process parameters, the predictive model methodologies, and data structures. Two modeling methods are employed to develop predictive models: analysis of variance (ANOVA), and a generalized reduced gradient (GRG) approach. To assist with process parameter solutions and to provide an initial value for nonlinear model seeding, data clustering is performed to identify characteristic bead shape families. This research illustrates good predictive models can be generated using multiple approaches.

12 February 2019 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JUJill Urbanic
Jill Urbanic
SSS. M. Saqib
S. M. Saqib

19 March 2022 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMSeyedeh Elnaz Mirazimzadeh
Seyedeh Elnaz Mirazimzadeh
SPSYAMAK PAZIREH
SYAMAK PAZIREH
JUJill Urbanic
Jill Urbanic
BHBob Hedrick
Bob Hedrick