The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the cessation of approximately 75% of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes worldwide. In March 2020, CR phase II (CRP2) services were stopped in Qatar. Multiple studies had shown safety, effectiveness, reduced cost of delivery and improved participation with hybrid CR. A multidisciplinary team reviewed various alternative models for delivery and decided to implement a hybrid CRP2 exercise programme (HCRP2-EP) to ensure continuation of our patient care. Our aim was to enrol in the HCRP2-EP 70% of all eligible patients by 30 September 2020. Institute for Health Care Improvement’s collaborative model was adopted. Multiple plan–do–study–act cycles were used to test change ideas. The outcomes of the project were analysed using standard run chart rules to detect the changes in outcomes over time. This project was implemented from March 2020, and the male patients enrolled between August 2020 and April 2021, with sustained monthly median enrolment above target of 70% throughout. As for our secondary outcome, 75.8% of the male patients who completed HCRP2-EP showed a meaningful change in peak exercise capacity of ≥10% (mean change 17%±6%). There were no major adverse events reported, and the median Patient Satisfaction Score was 96% well above the institutional target of 90%. This shows a well-designed quality improvement programme is an appropriate strategy for implementing HCRP2-EP in a clinical setting, and HCRP2-EP is a feasible, effective and safe intervention in eligible male patients with cardiovascular disease.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) significantly improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). International guidelines vary in the minimum recommended frequency of supervised exercise from 1 to 3 sessions per week. This is the first study in the Middle East and North African regions assessing the impact of 2 versus 3 days/week of supervised exercise on peak exercise capacity in patients with CAD. Single-center retrospective cohort study involving 362 patients enrolled in the only CR center in the State of Qatar. Only high-quality data was included by strict evaluation of compliance to the exercise intervention. Fifty patients who underwent a symptom-limited exercise test before and after CR were included (31 patients on 2 days/week, 19 on 3 days/week). No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between groups. Exercise intervention differed significantly between groups in exercise training frequency (2 days/week: 1.97 ± 0.2 vs. 3 days/week: 2.7 ± 0.3; p < 0.00). Peak exercise capacity as peak metabolic equivalents of task (MET) significantly increased in both groups (2 days/week: Pre 8.3 ± 2.4 vs. Post 9.4 ± 2.9, p-value 0.00; 3 days/week: Pre 7.4 ± 1.6 vs. Post 8.4 ± 2.0, p-value 0.00). No significant difference was observed between groups for change in Peak Exercise Capacity (2 days/week 1.1 ± 1.1 vs. 3 days/week 1.0 ± 0.9, p = 0.87). When the total number of exercise sessions is equal, supervised exercise frequencies of 2 and 3 days/week may significantly and equally improve peak exercise capacity in patients with CAD.

Introduction: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers, defibrillators, and resynchronization devices, significantly enhance patient outcomes, reduce sudden cardiac death, and improve health-related quality of life. CIED implantation is associated to persistent shoulder dysfunction in a considerable number of patients one-year post-implantation. This may result in disability, diminished quality of life, work absenteeism, and negative psychological effects. Restoring upper extremity function after CIED implantation should be a standard of cardiovascular care. Our systematic scoping review aimed to summarize available evidence, addressing vital questions about safety, effectiveness, exercise type, and time of exercise initiation immediately after CIED implantation. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in 5 electronic databases for original research in English, and a manual search on the references of included studies. We used Rayyan web application for study selection, and PRISMA-ScR to conduct and report the review. We assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. Results: This review included 6 studies that used upper extremity pendular, range of motion, stretching and strengthening exercises. Initiation time varied from the first postoperative day to the second postoperative week. All studies showed significant association between active upper extremity exercise and reduced dysfunction and disability after CIED implantation. There were no significant differences in complication rates between control and experimental groups. Conclusion: A limited number of low-to-average quality studies suggest active upper extremity exercise immediately after CIED implantation is safe, effective at reducing dysfunction, and improves quality of life. Higher-quality studies are needed to validate these findings.

Background: Silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) predicts adverse outcomes in coronary artery disease, yet the effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in this group are limited. We evaluated the impact of CR on peak exercise capacity, ischemic threshold, training workload progression, medication adherence, depression, and exercise-related adverse events in patients with documented SMI Type I and II. Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes 966 patients referred to CR. Twenty-nine patients who completed ≥1 session and had valid pre and post exercise tests were included in the final analysis. Main outcomes were changes in peak exercise capacity and ischemic threshold. Rate of adverse events, medication compliance, adverse drug reactions, and cardiac depression scores were also evaluated. Paired t tests were used (α=0.05). Results: Exercise-based CR resulted in a clinically and statistically significant improvement in exercise capacity (MET _peak : 8.43 ± 2.51 to 9.14 ± 2.81, P <.001). At ischemic threshold, heart rate increased (123.94 ± 16.08 to 127.82 ± 17.23, P <.001), systolic blood pressure reduced (167.41 ± 33.14 to 164.41 ± 22.59, P =.006), and rate-pressure product increased (21939.53 ± 5362.54 to 22013.88 ± 4203.48, P =.009). The rate of exercise-related adverse events was low (2.23 per 100 sessions), with no major adverse events. Compliance with medications remained above 85% pre-to-post CR, with only 1 reported adverse drug reaction. Conclusions: Exercise-based CR is safe and effective for patients with SMI, improving exercise capacity and ischemic tolerance with few adverse events. These findings support integrating CR into the management of asymptomatic, high-risk coronary patients.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) aims to enhance cardiovascular health and quality of life, as well as survival through structured exercise training, lifestyle education, cardiovascular risk factor management, and psychosocial support. Despite growing evidence linking sleep disorders, poor sleep health, and circadian rhythm disruption to impaired cardiac recovery, reduced exercise adherence, and increased adverse cardiovascular events, systematic assessment and management of sleep and circadian health remain underutilized in CR programs. In this narrative review, we aim to explore and characterize the gap and address the potential benefits of incorporating sleep and circadian rhythm assessment into CR practice. Sleep disorders commonly encountered in patients undergoing CR, including obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, and insomnia, may adversely affect CR participation, functional recovery, and cardiovascular prognosis. Practical strategies include routine sleep screening with validated assessment tools, selective use of objective sleep assessments, sleep hygiene education, chronotype-informed exercise scheduling, and referral pathways to sleep medicine specialists. Integrating sleep-circadian considerations into CR may enhance cardiac recovery, improve exercise tolerance and adherence, and support more comprehensive, personalized secondary prevention strategies. Artificial intelligence may further support early detection of sleep disturbances, individualized exercise prescription, remote monitoring, and precision CR approaches integrating sleep and circadian health.