Upper limb function is one of the most affected domains in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), as self-reported by 50% of patients. Heterogeneous results have been found about the correlation between objective and subjective upper limb function. The aim of the present study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies presenting data on the strength of association between the gold standard for 9-Hole Peg Test scores and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) of manual ability. Primary research studies including assessments of 9-Hole Peg Test scores and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures were searched in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed. Meta analytical calculations were performed using a random-effects model. We retrieved n = 27 studies including n = 75 distinct effect sizes (N of subjects = 3263). The central tendency analysis showed a strong correlation between 9-HPT scores and PROMs (r = 0.51, 95% CI [0.44, 0.58]). Moderator analysis showed the effect size to be significantly larger in studies with a mean or median EDSS level indicating severe disability. The publication bias hypothesis was not supported; instead, we noted that studies based on larger samples also tend to report stronger effect sizes. Results of the study indicate that the correlation between 9-HPT and PROMs is strong, although the constructs measured by these instrument does not fully overlap. The correlation between 9-HPT and PROMs was stronger in larger studies and when samples include a sizeable subgroup of PwMS with severe disability, pointing out the importance of sample diversity.

As meaningful measure of cognitive impairment (CI), cognitive phenotypes provide an avenue for symptom management and individualized rehabilitation. Since CI is highly variable in severity and progression, monitoring cognitive phenotypes over time may be useful to identify trajectory of cognitive decline in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Based on cognitive and mood information from patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinician-assessed outcomes (CAOs), four cognitive subgroups of people with MS (PwMS) were identified: phenotype 1 (44.5%) showed a preserved cognitive profile; phenotype 2 (22.8%) had a mild-cognitive impairment profile with attention difficulties; phenotype 3 (24.3%) included people with marked difficulties in visuo-executive, attention, language, memory and information processing speed; lastly, phenotype 4 (8.4%) grouped individuals with a multi-domain impairment profile (visuo-executive, attention, language, memory, orientation, information processing speed and mood disorders). Although some fluctuations occurred considering the rate of impairment, cognitive phenotypes did not substantially vary at follow up in terms of type and number of impairments, suggesting that 1 year is a relatively brief temporal window to observe considerable changes. Our results corroborate that investigating cognitive phenotypes and their stability over time would provide valuable information regarding CI and, in addition, increase clinical importance of PROs and CAOs and their uptake in decision-making and individualized treatment planning for PwMS.

Background and purpose: Upper limb (UL) function is often affected in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and is typically assessed through objective measures, including the Nine Hole Peg Test (9‐HPT), Box and Block Test (BBT), and Hand Grip Strength (HGS). It is important to include the subjective perspective of PwMS in the assessment. This study aims to evaluate associations between Manual Ability Measure‐36 (MAM‐36) and 9‐HPT, BBT, and HGS in MS.Methods: The cross‐sectional study included five Italian centers. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, MS diagnosis, and stable disease course. Exclusion criteria were bilateral UL paralysis, and concomitant orthopedic or neurological diseases.Results: A total of 199 PwMS were included: 128 female, mean age = 50.7 ± 13.0 years, 119 relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS), 31 primary and 49 secondary progressive MS, mean disease duration = 14.0 ± 10.4, years, mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) = 4.6 ± 2.0.The MAM‐36 showed small correlations with 9‐HPT, BBT, and HGS. Correlations between MAM‐36 and 9‐HPT and BBT were highest among subjects with EDSS ≥ 6 and progressive MS. MAM‐36 and HGS showed the highest correlations in subjects with EDSS ≤ 5 and RRMS. Combining 9‐HPT and HGS provided the strongest predictive power over the MAM‐36.Conclusions: Correlations between objective measures and MAM‐36 were small to moderate, meaning that objective measures do not match subjects' perception of UL function. The combination of 9‐HPT and HGS measures can help improve the assessment of UL function in activities of daily living.