Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the dentoskeletal pattern of Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS) and nonsyndromic Pierre Robin sequence (PRS). Design: Retrospective. Setting: Single center. Patients: Eighteen patients diagnosed with TCS (Group TCS) or PRS (Group PRS) in rehabilitation treatment at a single center. Group TCS was composed of 9 patients (4 male, 5 female) with a mean age of 12.9 years (standard deviation = 4.8). Group PRS was composed of 9 patients paired by age and sex with group TCS. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cone beam computed tomography–derived cephalometric images taken before the orthodontic or the orthodontic-surgical treatment were analyzed using Dolphin Imaging (Dolphin Imaging 11.0 & Management Solutions). Variables evaluating the cranial base, the maxillary and mandibular skeletal components, maxillomandibular relationship, the vertical components and the dentoalveolar region were measured. Intergroup comparisons were performed using t tests. The significance level considered was 5%. Results: Intergroup differences in the mandible size and growth pattern were observed. Group TCS showed a smaller mandibular length (Co-Go, Co-Gn) and a higher palatal plane (SN-Palatal Plane) and mandibular plane angles (SN-Go.Gn) compared to group PRS. No differences between TCS and PRS were observed for the sagittal position of the maxilla, maxillomandibular relationship, and dental components. Conclusions: Treacher Collins syndrome presented a decreased mandible and a more severe vertical growth pattern compared to PRS.
1 December 2021 in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Objective: This study aimed to develop a new method to quantify occlusal improvement in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who had undergone orthodontic treatment and to evaluate its reproducibility. Design: A panel of orthodontists decided on the relevance of different occlusal features to score initial and final 3-dimensional study models and panoramic radiographs. A subsequent subjective analysis was later performed by a local orthodontic panel. Setting: The sample was obtained from the orthodontic clinical archives of a hospital known for the treatment of patients with craniofacial differences. Patients: Thirty-one nonsyndromic patients, 17 males and 14 females, were randomly selected according to preestablished inclusion/exclusion criteria. Interventions: The records corresponded to the period during which the patients were treated with conventional multibracket mechanics and adjunctive restorative procedures. Main Outcome/Measures: The intraclass correlation coefficient measured intraexaminer and interexaminer agreements. The Spearman correlation test assessed the relationship between the local orthodontic panel perception and the improvement scores. Results: Inter- and intra-rater ICCs varied between fair/good to excellent. There was a strong correlation between the Cleft-Customized Occlusal Rating system classification of occlusal improvement and the local orthodontic panel’s perception, thereby enabling the utilization of the interpretation scale by the panel. Conclusions: The method showed to be a useful tool in quantifying and classifying occlusal improvement in this specific population. As any other method, some limitations apply and need to be accounted for.
8 March 2024 in The Korean Journal of Orthodontics
Renata Mayumi Kato, João Roberto Gonçalves, Jaqueline Ignácio, Larry Wolford, Patricia Bicalho de Mello, Julianna Parizotto, Jonas Bianchi. Korean J Orthod 2024;54:128-35. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod23.166