Background. Two common techniques of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting are the composite T graft and in situ crossover graft. The superiority of one method over the other has not yet been established. Methods. From April 1996 to July 1999, bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic arteries were used as T grafts (composite group, n=649) and in situ grafts (cross group, n=351) in 1,000 consecutive patients. In the cross group, in situ right internal thoracic artery was routed anterior to the aorta across the midline for grafting to the left anterior descending artery, and the left internal thoracic artery was used for the circumflex branches. Results. The two groups had comparable preoperative risk profiles. Bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time were longer in the composite group (80 ± 38 and 67 ± 29 minutes versus 66 ± 43 and 55 ± 34 minutes, respectively). Number of anastomoses per patient was similar (3.1 versus 3.2). However, more sequential anastomoses were performed in the composite group (62% versus 53%), and the gastroepiploic artery was used more often in the cross group (30% versus 19%). Thirty-day mortality was 3.9% in the composite and 2.3% in the cross group (not significant). Occurrence of postoperative complications (sternal infection, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and bleeding) was similar. Late follow-up (2 to 56 months) showed increased return of angina (6% versus 3.1%; p = 0.046) and decreased 4-year survival (Kaplan-Meier; 86% ± 2.7% versus 92.4% ± 1.5%; p = 0.07) in composite patients. Conclusions. Early results of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting with composite T graft are comparable with those of in situ grafts. However, increased angina return and decreased midterm survival led us to recommend in situ grafting whenever technically possible.

Background— Skeletonized harvesting of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) decreases the severity of sternal devascularization, thus reducing the risk of postoperative sternal complications in patients undergoing bilateral ITA grafting. Methods and Results— Between 1996 and 2001, 1515 consecutive patients underwent skeletonized bilateral ITA grafting. Of the 1179 male and 336 female patients, 641 (42.3%) were >70 years of age, and 519 (34.2%) had diabetes mellitus. Operative mortality was 2.8%. Early postoperative morbidity included sternal infection (1.6%), cerebrovascular accident (3%), and perioperative myocardial infarction (1%). Multiple regression analysis showed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio, 11.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.45 to 28.55), repeat operation (odds ratio, 12.7; 95% CI, 3.25 to 49.56), and diabetes mellitus (non–insulin dependent: odds ratio, 4.64; 95% CI, 1.85 to 11.59; insulin dependent: odds ratio, 6.9; 95% CI, 1.35 to 35.27) to be associated with increased risk of sternal infection. Follow-up (between 5 and 12 years) revealed 305 late deaths. Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival rates for patients 75 years of age were 87%, 75%, and 52%, respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed increased overall mortality (early and late) in patients with peripheral vascular disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.33), patients >75 years of age (HR, 7.23; 95% CI, 4.16 to 12.55), those undergoing repeat operations (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.27 to 3.89), patients with preoperative congestive heart failure (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.75), and those with chronic renal failure (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.01). Operations performed without cardiopulmonary bypass were associated with better postoperative survival (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.87). Conclusions— Bilateral ITA grafting is associated with low morbidity and good long-term results. Use of skeletonized bilateral ITA is appropriate for the elderly and most patients with diabetes; however, it is not recommended for repeat operations or for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Background—: Although bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with improved survival, the use of this technique in the elderly is controversial because of their increased surgical risk and shorter life expectancy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of age on outcome of patients undergoing bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. Methods and Results—: Between 1996 and 2001, 1714 consecutive patients underwent skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting, of whom 748 were ≤65 years of age, 688 were between 65 and 75 years of age, and 278 were ≥75 years of age. Operative mortality of the 3 age groups (1.2%, 4.1%, and 5.8%, respectively) was lower than the logistic EuroSCORE predicted mortality (3.9%, 6.5%, and 9.3%, respectively; P 75 years of age was 85%, 65%, and 40%, respectively ( P <0.001). These rates were better than the corresponding predicted Charlson Comorbidity Index survival rates (68%, 37%, and 20%, respectively; P 65 years of age because of the significant survival benefit obtained with this surgical technique with no additional risk of sternal wound infection related to age.