Panagiotis Lainas

Dr. Panagiotis Lainas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2009 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IDIbrahim Dagher
Ibrahim Dagher
NONicholas O'ROurke
Nicholas O'ROurke
DGDavid A. Geller
David A. Geller
DCDaniel Cherqui
Daniel Cherqui
GBGiulio Belli
Giulio Belli
JBJoseph F. Buell
Joseph F. Buell
To analyze the results of 6 international surgical centers performing laparoscopic major liver resections. The safety and feasibility of laparoscopy for minor liver resections has been previously demonstrated. Major anatomic liver resections, initially considered to be unsuitable for laparoscopy, are increasingly reported by several centers worldwide. Prospective databases of 3 European, 2 U.S., and 1 Australian centers were combined. Between 1997 and 2008, 210 major liver resections were performed: 136 right and 74 left hepatectomies. Results and differences in surgical techniques between the 6 centers are outlined. Surgical duration was 250 minutes (range: 90–655 minutes). Operative blood loss was 300 mL (range: 20–2500 mL). Thirty patients (14.3%) received blood transfusion. Conversion to open surgery was required in 26 patients (12.4%). Portal triad clamping was performed in 24 patients (11.4%). Median tumor size was 5.4 cm (range: 1–25 cm) and surgical margin was 10.5 mm (range: 0–70 mm). Two patients died during the postoperative period from pulmonary embolism and urosepsis. Liver-specific and general complications occurred in 17 (8.1%) and 29 patients (13.8%), respectively. Hospital length of stay was 6 days (range: 1–34 days). A further analysis of early (n = 90) and late (n = 120) experience showed improved surgical and postoperative results in the latter group. This multicenter study demonstrates that laparoscopic major liver resections are feasible in selected patients and results improve with experience. However, proficiency in both open liver surgery and advanced laparoscopy is compulsory and surgeons must begin with minor laparoscopic resections.

1 November 2009 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KNKevin Tri Nguyen
Kevin Tri Nguyen
ALAlexis Laurent
Alexis Laurent
IDIbrahim Dagher
Ibrahim Dagher
DGDavid A. Geller
David A. Geller
JSJennifer Steel
Jennifer Steel
TGT Clark Gamblin
T Clark Gamblin
To evaluate a multicenter, international series on minimally invasive liver resection for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) metastasis. Multiple single series have been reported on laparoscopic liver resection for CRC metastasis. We report the first collaborative multicenter, international series to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and oncologic integrity of laparoscopic liver resection for CRC metastasis. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent minimally invasive liver resection for CRC metastasis from February 2000 to September 2008 from multiple medical centers from the United States and Europe. The multicenter series of patients were accumulated into a single database. Patient demographics, preoperative, operative, and postoperative characteristics were analyzed. Actuarial overall survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. A total of 109 patients underwent minimally invasive liver resection for CRC metastasis. The median age was 63 years (range, 32-88 years) with 51% females. The most common sites of primary colon cancer were sigmoid/rectum (51%), right colon (25%), and left colon (13%). Synchronous liver lesions were present in 11% of patients. For those with metachronous lesions liver lesions, the median time interval from primary colon cancer surgery to liver metastasectomy was 12 months. Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 68% of cases prior to liver resection. The majority of patients underwent prior abdominal operations (95%). Minimally invasive approaches included totally laparoscopic (56%) and hand-assisted laparoscopic (41%), the latter of which was employed more frequently in the US medical centers (85%) compared with European centers (13%) (P = 0.001). There were 4 conversions to open surgery (3.7%), all due to bleeding. Extents of resection include wedge/segmentectomy (34%), left lateral sectionectomy (27%), right hepatectomy (28%), left hepatectomy (9%), extended right hepatectomy (0.9%), and caudate lobectomy (0.9%). Major liver resections (> or =3 segments) were performed in 45% of patients. Median OR time was 234 minutes (range, 60-555 minutes) and blood loss was 200 mL (range, 20-2500 mL) with 10% receiving a blood transfusion. There were no reported perioperative deaths and a 12% complication rate. Median length of hospital stay for the entire series was 4 days (range, 1-22 days) with a shorter stay in medical centers in the United States (3 days) versus that seen in Europe (6 days) (P = 0.001). Negative margins were achieved in 94.4% of patients. Actuarial overall survivals at 1-, 3-, and 5-year for the entire series were 88%, 69%, and 50%, respectively. Disease-free survivals at 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 65%, 43%, and 43%, respectively. Minimally invasive liver resection for colorectal metastasis is safe, feasible, and oncologically comparable to open liver resection for both minor and major liver resections, even with prior intra-abdominal operations, in selected patients and when performed by experienced surgeons.

14 November 2009 in Surgical Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HTHadrien Tranchart
Hadrien Tranchart
GGGiuseppe Di Giuro
Giuseppe Di Giuro
PLPanagiotis Lainas
Panagiotis Lainas
JRJean Roudie
Jean Roudie
HAHelene Agostini
Helene Agostini
IDIbrahim Dagher
Ibrahim Dagher

8 May 2018 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHM. C. Halls
M. C. Halls
GBGiammauro Berardi
Giammauro Berardi
FCFederica Cipriani
Federica Cipriani
LBL. Barkhatov
L. Barkhatov
PLPanagiotis Lainas
Panagiotis Lainas
Mohammed Abu HilalMohammed Abu Hilal
Mohammed Abu Hilal

1 August 2009 in The American Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IDIbrahim Dagher
Ibrahim Dagher
GGGiuseppe Di Giuro
Giuseppe Di Giuro
JDJulien Dubrez
Julien Dubrez
PLPanagiotis Lainas
Panagiotis Lainas
CSClaude Smadja
Claude Smadja
DFDominique Franco
Dominique Franco

1 July 2010 in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IDIbrahim Dagher
Ibrahim Dagher
GBGiulio Belli
Giulio Belli
CFCorrado Fantini
Corrado Fantini
ALAlexis Laurent
Alexis Laurent
CTClaude Tayar
Claude Tayar
DCDaniel Cherqui
Daniel Cherqui
Some series have suggested that laparoscopy is beneficial for resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. This has to be confirmed in larger series. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of 3 European surgical centers on laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma. Prospective databases of 3 European centers involved in the development of laparoscopic liver surgery were combined. Between 1998 and 2008, 163 liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma were performed. Liver parenchyma was cirrhotic in 120 (73.6%) patients. Liver resection was anatomic in 107 (65.6%) patients and was a major resection (>or=3 segments) in 16 (9.8%). A totally laparoscopic approach was used in 155 (95.1%) patients. Median surgical duration was 180 minutes. Median operative blood loss was 250 mL, and 16 (9.8%) patients received blood transfusion. Conversion to open surgery was required in 15 (9.2%) patients. Median tumor size was 3.6 cm and median surgical margin was 12 mm. Liver-specific and general complications occurred in 19 (11.6%) and 17 (10.4%) patients, respectively. Hospital length of stay was 7 days. A further analysis of early (n = 75) and recent (n = 88) experiences showed improved results in the latter group. Overall and recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 92.6%, 68.7%, 64.9%, and 77.5%, 47.1%, 32.2%, respectively. This study demonstrates that laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is feasible in selected patients, with good operative and oncologic results. Laparoscopy should be routinely considered in centers experienced in liver surgery and advanced laparoscopy.