Background: The natural history and prognosis of mesenteric panniculitis (MP) are not well-described. Despite referral for colonoscopy being common for this indication, colonoscopy findings in MP patients have not been reported. Therefore, we aimed to describe upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy findings in patients with mesenteric panniculitis, compared to matched controls, to investigate their clinical outcomes including incidence of malignancy and mortality. Methods: Retrospective case–control study was conducted, and included patients who were diagnosed with mesenteric panniculitis according to Coulier radiologic criteria on abdominal computerized tomography between 1/2005 and 12/2019, and followed to 12/2021. The case group was compared to a matched control group without MP on abdominal CT. Clinical data and the upper and lower endoscopies’ reports were reviewed in both groups. We excluded patients who, beyond diagnosis of MP, were also diagnosed with current malignancy, significant intra-abdominal morbidity or inflammatory bowel disease. Results: The initial set of 376 patients with MP, after exclusion, included 187 patients. A total of 56.1% were male, with a mean age 60 ± 15 years. Of them, 74 (39%) patients underwent follow-up CT scans, which demonstrated, in 66 (89.2%) patients, a stable MP without any aggravation. Colonoscopy was performed in 89 MP patients, and 98/187 controls. No significant difference in the colonoscopies’ findings was found between the two groups. Gastroscopy was performed in 84 MP and 79 controls. No case of gastric cancer was found. No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of gastroscopy findings. By the end of the follow-up period, malignancy was diagnosed in four patients of the MP group. None were colon cancer. The mortality rate in the MP group was 3.2%, without a significant difference compared to the controls. None were MP related. Conclusions: MP identified on abdominal CT is not associated with pathologic endoscopy findings or future diagnosis of colon cancer, and also has no impact on mortality rate. Since repeating abdominal CT did not reveal any disease progression, the necessity of follow-up imaging for MP should be carefully reconsidered.

Two doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines elicit an attenuated humoral immune response among immunocompromised patients. Our study aimed to assess the immunogenicity of a third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine among lung transplant recipients (LTRs). We prospectively evaluated the humoral response by measuring anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 and neutralizing antibodies in 139 vaccinated LTRs ~4–6 weeks following the third vaccine dose. The t-cell response was evaluated by IFNγ assay. The primary outcome was the seropositivity rate following the third vaccine dose. Secondary outcomes included: positive neutralizing antibody and cellular immune response rate, adverse events, and COVID-19 infections. Results were compared to a control group of 41 healthcare workers. Among LTRs, 42.4% had a seropositive antibody titer, and 17.2% had a positive t-cell response. Seropositivity was associated with younger age (t = 3.736, p < 0.001), higher GFR (t = 2.355, p = 0.011), and longer duration from transplantation (t = −1.992, p = 0.024). Antibody titer positively correlated with neutralizing antibodies (r = 0.955, p < 0.001). The current study may suggest the enhancement of immunogenicity by using booster doses. Since monoclonal antibodies have limited effectiveness against prevalent sub-variants and LTRs are prone to severe COVID-19 morbidity, vaccination remains crucial for this vulnerable population.

Background: Monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) during pregnancy is challenging due tolimited use of invasive tools. While fecal calprotectin is considered reliable, its use is limited by patient adherence and availability. Blood-based markers, such as serum chitinase-3-like-1 (CHI3L1), offer a promising alternative. Aim: To evaluate whether serum CHI3L1 reflects disease activity in pregnant IBD patients, compared to standard markers and clinical questionnaires. Methods: Pregnant IBD patients were recruited from a multidisciplinary clinic. Blood samples were collected to assess inflammatory markers. Stool samples were used to measure calprotectin levels. Each visit was classified as a distinct sample for analysis. Correlations between CHI3L1 and disease activity markers were examined. Results: A total of 124 samples from 80 pregnant IBD patients were analyzed: 90 from Crohn’s disease (CD) patients and 34 from ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. CHI3L1 levels showed a significant positive correlation with fecal calprotectin (r_p = 0.366, p = 0.008), ESR (r_p = 0.358, p = 0.001), CRP (r_p = 0.478, p < 0.001) and standardized clinical scoring questionnaires. Elevated CHI3L1 (>56.6 ng/mL) is a risk factor for active disease (OR 8.78, 95% CI 1.54–49.83, p = 0.014). Conclusions: Serum CHI3L1 is positively associated with established markers of inflammation and may serve as a useful non-invasive biomarker for monitoring IBD activity during pregnancy, a medical condition in which invasive procedures are not recommended. Based on CHI3L1 levels, personalized treatment for pregnant IBD patients can be tailored. However, further validation is recommended.