Kavita Khatri

Dr. Kavita Khatri

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 August 2022 in Brazilian Journal of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKavita Khatri
Kavita Khatri
BNBhawna Negi
Bhawna Negi
KIRAN BARGALIKIRAN BARGALI
KIRAN BARGALI
Surendra BargaliSurendra Bargali
Surendra Bargali

3 July 2023 in Environment, Development and Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKavita Khatri
Kavita Khatri
BNBhawna Negi
Bhawna Negi
KIRAN BARGALIKIRAN BARGALI
KIRAN BARGALI
Surendra BargaliSurendra Bargali
Surendra Bargali

1 September 2023 in Journal of Mountain Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BNBhawna Negi
Bhawna Negi
KKKavita Khatri
Kavita Khatri
Surendra BargaliSurendra Bargali
Surendra Bargali
KIRAN BARGALIKIRAN BARGALI
KIRAN BARGALI
AFArchana Fartyal
Archana Fartyal
RCRavi Kant Chaturvedi
Ravi Kant Chaturvedi

14 November 2022 in Heliyon
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Surendra BargaliSurendra Bargali
Surendra Bargali
CSCharu Shahi
Charu Shahi
KBKiran Bargali
Kiran Bargali
BNBhawna Negi
Bhawna Negi
KKKavita Khatri
Kavita Khatri
Himalayas with diverse topographical and ecological zones sustain diverse agroecosystems. Differences in precipitation regimes, cropping systems, land-use systems and availability of resources significantly affect energy flow within agroecosystems (AGEs) of the region. Thus, the present study was aimed to evaluate the energy use pattern and economic profitability of different sized agroecosystems (small, medium and large) along the altitudinal gradient [very low altitude (VLA), low altitude (LA), mid altitude (MA) and high altitude (HA)] of Central Himalaya, India. The sampling was carried out following random stratified design and total 108 agroecosystems (4 altitudes× 3 sizes × 3 replicates × 3 seasons) were assessed. Data collected on quantities of agricultural inputs and outputs were converted to energy values using standard energetic constants and monetary values on the basis of local market price. Low altitude agroecosystems predominantly support cereal + pulse based cropping systems while, high altitudes favour cash crop cultivation (vegetables). Significant variation (P < 0.05) in total input and output energy was observed seasonally, while differences were insignificant across sizes and altitudes. Irrespective of the sizes and seasons, farmyard manure (organic fertilizer) contributed major share of total energy inputs across all altitudes in the order: HA AGEs (66.7 %) > MA AGEs (66.1 %) > VLA AGEs (62.6 %) > LA AGEs (52.1 %). The share of non-renewable energy inputs (inorganic fertilizers and fuel) declined along altitudinal gradient as: LA (31.1 %) > VLA (26.9 %) > MA (12.5 %) > HA (11.8 %). Seasonally, highest net energy was recorded during rainy season (92286 M J ha−1 yr−1) followed by summer (68906 M J ha−1 yr−1) and winter (18686 M J ha−1 yr−1). The economic yield significantly increased with increasing altitude and was recorded maximum for large sized agroecosystems. Energy use efficiency (EUE) differed distinctly (P < 0.05) across seasons and was recorded maximum during rainy season (8) while, across sizes and altitudes it did not vary significantly. EUE did not reflect any definite pattern along altitudinal gradient [HA AGEs (3.84) > VLA AGEs (3.81) > LA AGEs (3.56) > MA AGEs (3.01)]. Benefit-cost ratios (BCR) differed significantly (P < 0.05) along altitudes and was maximum at VLA AGEs (5.27) however, differences were insignificant across sizes and seasons. From present study, it can be concluded that season and altitude had significant impact on the energetics and economic flow of the agroecosystems while, no marked differences were observed for size classes. High altitude agroecosystems were energetically efficient while, monetary wise very low altitude systems.