Lisandro Colantonio

Dr. Lisandro Colantonio

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 April 2014 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPaul Muntner
Paul Muntner
LCLisandro Colantonio
Lisandro Colantonio
MCMary Cushman
Mary Cushman
DGDavid C. Goff
David C. Goff
GHGeorge Howard
George Howard
MSMonika M. Safford
Monika M. Safford
The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) recently published the 2013 Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk.1 As part of this guideline, a working group developed new equations for the prediction of 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, the Pooled Cohort risk equations. These equations were derived in several population-based cohorts that included large samples of blacks and whites and were aimed at estimating 10-year risk for nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), coronary heart disease (CHD) death, and nonfatal or fatal stroke (hard atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events). The 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol treatment guidelines recommend using the Pooled Cohort risk equations to estimate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk and to help guide the decision to initiate statin therapy for primary prevention in adults without clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or diabetes, and with a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level between 70 and 189 mg/dL.2

1 September 2015 in Annals of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PMPaul Muntner
Paul Muntner
JWJeff Whittle
Jeff Whittle
ALAmy I. Lynch
Amy I. Lynch
LCLisandro Colantonio
Lisandro Colantonio
LSLara M. Simpson
Lara M. Simpson
SOSuzanne Oparil
Suzanne Oparil
Variability of blood pressure (BP) across outpatient visits is frequently dismissed as random fluctuation around a patient's underlying BP. To examine the association of visit-to-visit variability (VVV) of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality outcomes. Prospective cohort study. Post hoc analysis of ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial). 25 814 ALLHAT participants. The VVV of SBP was defined as the SD across SBP measurements obtained at 7 visits conducted from 6 to 28 months after ALLHAT enrollment. Participants without CVD events during the first 28 months of follow-up were followed from the 28-month visit through the end of active ALLHAT follow-up. Outcomes included fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) or nonfatal myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, stroke, and heart failure. During follow-up, 1194 fatal CHD or nonfatal MI events, 1948 deaths, 606 strokes, and 921 heart failure events occurred. After multivariable adjustment, including for mean SBP, the hazard ratio comparing participants in the highest versus lowest quintile of SD of SBP (≥14.4 mm Hg vs. <6.5 mm Hg) was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.59) for fatal CHD or nonfatal MI, 1.58 (CI, 1.32 to 1.90) for all-cause mortality, 1.46 (CI, 1.06 to 2.01) for stroke, and 1.25 (CI, 0.97 to 1.61) for heart failure. Higher VVV of diastolic BP was also associated with CVD events and mortality. Long-term outcomes were not available. Higher VVV of SBP is associated with an increased risk for CVD and mortality. Future studies should examine whether reducing VVV of BP lowers this risk. National Institutes of Health.

1 March 2017 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMaria-Corina Serban
Maria-Corina Serban
LCLisandro Colantonio
Lisandro Colantonio
AMAngelika D. Manthripragada
Angelika D. Manthripragada
KMKeri L. Monda
Keri L. Monda
VBVera A. Bittner
Vera A. Bittner
RRRobert S. Rosenson
Robert S. Rosenson

1 August 2016 in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMichelle T. Long
Michelle T. Long
APAlison Pedley
Alison Pedley
LCLisandro Colantonio
Lisandro Colantonio
JMJoseph M. Massaro
Joseph M. Massaro
UHUdo Hoffmann
Udo Hoffmann
CFCaroline S. Fox
Caroline S. Fox

25 January 2008 in Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FAFernando Althabe
Fernando Althabe
EBEduardo Bergel
Eduardo Bergel
MCMaría Luisa Cafferata
María Luisa Cafferata
LGLuz Gibbons
Luz Gibbons
ACAgustin Ciapponi
Agustin Ciapponi
APAlvaro Rodríguez Palacios
Alvaro Rodríguez Palacios

8 January 2019 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LCLisandro Colantonio
Lisandro Colantonio
RRRobert S. Rosenson
Robert S. Rosenson
LDLuqin Deng
Luqin Deng
KMKeri L. Monda
Keri L. Monda
YDYuling Dai
Yuling Dai
PMPaul Muntner
Paul Muntner
Background: Prior studies suggest that persistence with and adherence to statin therapy is low. Interventions to improve statin persistence and adherence have been developed over the past decade. Methods and Results: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults aged ≥21 y with commercial or government health insurance in the MarketScan (Truven Health Analytics) and Medicare databases who initiated statins in 2007–2014 and (1) started treatment after a myocardial infarction (n=201 573), (2) had diabetes mellitus but without coronary heart disease (CHD; n=610 049), or (3) did not have CHD or diabetes mellitus (n=2 244 868). Persistence with (ie, not discontinuing treatment) and high adherence to statin therapy were assessed using pharmacy fills in the year following treatment initiation. In 2007 and 2014, the proportions of patients persistent with statin therapy were 78.1% and 79.1%, respectively, among those initiating treatment following myocardial infarction; 66.5% and 67.3%, respectively, for those with diabetes mellitus but without CHD; and 64.3% and 63.9%, respectively, for those without CHD or diabetes mellitus. Between 2007 and 2014, high adherence to statin therapy increased from 57.9% to 63.8% among patients initiating treatment following myocardial infarction and from 34.9% to 37.6% among those with diabetes mellitus but without CHD (each P trend <0.001). Among patients without CHD or diabetes mellitus, high adherence did not improve between 2007 (35.7%) and 2014 (36.8%; P trend =0.14). In 2014, statin adherence was lower among younger, black, and Hispanic patients versus white patients and those initiating a high‐intensity statin dosage. Statin adherence was higher among men and patients with cardiologist care following treatment initiation. Conclusions: Persistence with and adherence to statin therapy remain low, particularly among those without CHD.