The spatial distribution of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) defines several histologically and clinically distinct immune subtypes—desert (no TILs), excluded (TILs in stroma), and inflamed (TILs in tumor parenchyma). To date, robust classification of immune subtypes still requires deeper experimental evidence across various cancer types. Here, we aimed to investigate, define, and validate the immune subtypes in melanoma by coupling transcriptional and histological assessments of the lymphocyte distribution in tumor parenchyma and stroma. We used the transcriptomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas melanoma dataset to screen for the desert, excluded, and inflamed immune subtypes. We defined subtype-specific genes and used them to construct a subtype assignment algorithm. We validated the two-step algorithm in the qPCR data of real-world melanoma tumors with histologically defined immune subtypes. The accuracy of a classifier encompassing expression data of seven genes (immune response-related: CD2, CD53, IRF1, and CD8B; and stroma-related: COL5A2, TNFAIP6, and INHBA) in a validation cohort reached 79%. Our findings suggest that melanoma tumors can be classified into transcriptionally and histologically distinct desert, excluded, and inflamed subtypes. Gene expression-based algorithms can assist physicians and pathologists as biomarkers in the rapid assessment of a tumor immune microenvironment while serving as a tool for clinical decision making.

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is known to exhibit a wide spectrum of aggressiveness and relatively high immunogenicity. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of tumor excision on immunophenotype rearrangements in peripheral blood and to elucidate if it is associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) in high risk (HR) and low risk (LR) patients. Methods: Radical prostatectomy (RP) was performed on 108 PCa stage pT2–pT3 patients. Preoperative vs. postoperative (one and three months) immunophenotype profile (T- and B-cell subsets, MDSC, NK, and T reg populations) was compared in peripheral blood of LR and HR groups. Results: The BCR-free survival difference was significant between the HR and LR groups. Postoperative PSA decay rate, defined as ePSA, was significantly slower in the HR group and predicted BCR at cut-off level ePSA = −2.0% d⁻¹ (AUC = 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78–0.90). Three months following tumor excision, the LR group exhibited a recovery of natural killer CD3 − CD16+ CD56+ cells, from 232 cells/µL to 317 cells/µL (p < 0.05), which was not detectable in the HR group. Prostatectomy also resulted in an increased CD8+ population in the LR group, mostly due to CD8+ CD69+ compartment (from 186 cells/µL before surgery to 196 cells/µL three months after, p < 001). The CD8+ CD69+ subset increase without total T cell increase was present in the HR group (p < 0.001). Tumor excision resulted in a myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) number increase from 12.4 cells/µL to 16.2 cells/µL in the HR group, and no change was detectable in LR patients (p = 0.12). An immune signature of postoperative recovery was more likely to occur in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Open RP (ORP) was associated with increased MDSC numbers (p = 0.002), whereas LRP was characterized by an immunity sparing profile, with no change in MDSC subset (p = 0.16). Conclusion: Tumor excision in prostate cancer patients results in two distinct patterns of immunophenotype rearrangement. The low-risk group is highly responsive, revealing postoperative restoration of T cells, NK cells, and CD8+ CD69+ numbers and the absence of suppressor MDSC increase. The high-risk group presented a limited response, accompanied by a suppressor MDSC increase and CD8+ CD69+ increase. The laparoscopic approach, unlike ORP, did not result in an MDSC increase in the postoperative period.

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of soluble Programmed Death Ligand 1 (sPD-L1) and Programmed Death 1 (sPD-1) molecules in plasma, along with urinary mRNA biomarkers—Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA), Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3), and androgen receptor (AR) genes—for identifying clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa), defined as pathological stage 3. In a cohort of 68 PCa patients, sPD-L1 and sPD-1 levels were quantified using ELISA, while mRNA transcripts were measured by RT-qPCR. Results highlight the potential of integrating these liquid-based biomarkers. In particular, the combination of sPD-L1, sPD-1, and AR demonstrated the most significant improvement in diagnostic performance, increasing the area under the curve (AUC) from 0.65 to 0.81 and sensitivity from 60% to 88%, compared to AR alone. PSMA demonstrated an AUC of 0.82 and a specificity of 52.8%, which improved to an AUC of 0.85 and a specificity of 94.4% with the inclusion of sPD-L1 and sPD-1. Similarly, PCA3 achieved an AUC of 0.75 and a specificity of 53.8%, increasing to an AUC of 0.78 and a specificity of 76.9% when combined with these biomarkers. Incorporating sPD-L1 into a three-gene panel further elevated the AUC from 0.74 to 0.94. These findings underscore the value of multimodal liquid-based diagnostic panels in improving the management of clinically significant PCa.

Background/Objectives: Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a reliable and potent technique for managing primary tumors; however, significant efforts are being made to characterize and improve the systemic immune response, which is crucial for metastasis prevention. Current evidence suggests that the advancement of ECT will depend on its integration with complementary immunomodulatory methods. Methods: In this study, we examined the combined effects of calcium-based electrochemotherapy (CaECT, 1.3 kV/cm × 100 µs, eight pulses delivered at 1 Hz repetition frequency) with dendritic cell vaccination (DCV). Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC1) was used as a tumor model. We characterized the effects of CaECT alone and in combination with DCV therapy on tumor growth, analyzed the changes in immune cell subpopulations, and studied the humoral immune response dynamics on day 10, 20, and 30. Given the limited effect of DCV, additional experiments were conducted with the chemotherapeutic drug cyclophosphamide (CP), known for its immunomodulatory properties. Results: Although CaECT demonstrated potent antitumor activity and induced a significant immune response, its combination with DCV did not result in enhanced therapeutic efficacy. The combination of CP also failed to improve median survival. Conclusions: It is concluded that CaECT is a promising alternative to standard ECT involving bleomycin or cisplatin. However, further optimization is necessary to enhance the therapeutic synergy of CaECT when combined with DCV.