Roadside vegetation helps to retain air pollutants emitted by road traffic. On the other hand, its presence makes it difficult to ventilate street canyons. The paper examines the influence of vegetation on the dispersion of air pollution generated by road traffic, using the example of two street canyons—both-sided and one-sided street canyons. The study was conducted taking into account the actual emission conditions occurring on the analyzed road sections estimated using the HBEFA methodology. Subsequently, a three-dimensional pollution dispersion model named MISKAM was employed to simulate the air pollutant dispersion conditions in the analyzed street canyons. The modelling results were compared with the measurement data from air quality monitoring stations located in these canyons. The obtained results indicated that the presence of vegetation can significantly impact on the air dispersion of traffic-related exhaust and non-exhaust emissions. The impact of vegetation is more pronounced in the case of a street canyon with dense, high-rise development on both sides than in the case of a street canyon with such development on only one side. The results for the both-sided street canyon demonstrate that the discrepancy between the scenario devoid of vegetation and the scenario with vegetation was approximately 5 µg/m³ (10%) for PM₁₀ and approximately 54 µg/m³ (45%) for NO_x, with the former scenario showing lower values than the latter. Nevertheless, the scenario with the vegetation exhibited a lesser discrepancy with the air quality measurements. Vegetation functions as a natural barrier, reducing wind speed in the street canyon, which in turn limits the spread of pollutants in the air, leading to pollutant accumulation near the building walls that form the canyon. Consequently, atmospheric dispersion modelling must consider the presence of vegetation to accurately evaluate the effects of road traffic emissions on air quality in urban areas, particularly in street canyons. The results of this study may hold importance for urban planning and decision-making regarding environmental management in cities aimed at improving air quality and public health.

One of the elements of strategy aimed at minimizing the impact of road transport on air quality is the introduction of its reorganization resulting in decreased pollutant emissions to the air. The aim of the study was to determine the optimal strategy of corrective actions in terms of the air pollutant emissions from road transport. The study presents the assessment results of the emission reduction degree of selected pollutants (PM₁₀, PM_2.5, and NO_x) as well as the impact evaluation of this reduction on their concentrations in the air for adopted scenarios of the road management changes for one of the street canyons in Krakow (Southern Poland). Three scenarios under consideration of the city authorities were assessed: narrowing the cross-section of the street by eliminating one lane in both directions, limiting the maximum speed from 70 km/h to 50 km/h, and allowing only passenger and light commercial vehicles on the streets that meet the Euro 4 standard or higher. The best effects were obtained for the variant assuming banning of vehicles failing to meet the specified Euro standard. It would result in a decrease of the yearly averaged PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 concentrations by about 8–9% and for NO_x by almost 30%.

Efficient and environmentally friendly public transport is a requirement of a modern city. For many years, Krakow has been building a modern multimodal transportation system, with the bus services playing a significant role. The article presents the results of the studies carried out on the fleet of urban buses operating within the Krakow agglomeration in the years 2010-2015. The influence of modernization of the urban bus fleet in the specified period on emissions of the most significant air pollutants into the air was evaluated. The studies have confirmed a total reduction in emissions from buses during the study period at levels of approximately 28 % for NOx, approximately 35 % for PM10, approximately 39 % for PM2.5 and approximately 43 % for NMVOC.