Douglas Bulafu

Douglas Bulafu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPatience Muwanguzi
Patience Muwanguzi
STSimon Isabwe Tumusiime
Simon Isabwe Tumusiime
RNRacheal Nabunya
Racheal Nabunya
MTMark Goodwill Turyabe
Mark Goodwill Turyabe
DBDouglas Bulafu
Douglas Bulafu
TNTom Denis Ngabirano
Tom Denis Ngabirano
Background: Basic emergency care is an important component of health system strengthening in resource-limited settings in sub-Saharan Africa. Objectives: This scoping review mapped and synthesised evidence on the implementation, capacity-building approaches, and policy implications of the WHO/ICRC Basic Emergency Care (BEC) course in the region. Methods: Twenty studies from 13 countries were included. Reported facilitators of BEC implementation included perceived relevance to frontline practice, practical and structured course content, contextual adaptation, mentorship, and training-of-trainers or cascade approaches. Reported barriers included time constraints, staffing shortages, limited infrastructure and emergency care resources, and technological challenges affecting digital reinforcement strategies. Across studies, BEC was generally associated with short-term improvements in provider knowledge, confidence, and perceived competence. However, implementation outcomes were reported inconsistently and were largely limited to acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, with less evidence on adoption, cost, penetration, and sustainability. Evidence on longer-term retention, practice change, patient outcomes, and broader system-level impact remained limited. Conclusions: Overall, BEC appears to be a potentially useful and context-appropriate approach to strengthening frontline emergency care training, but stronger longitudinal and implementation-focused evaluations are needed.

22 February 2026 in Discover Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDouglas Bulafu
Douglas Bulafu
SKSteven Ndugwa Kabwama
Steven Ndugwa Kabwama
RNRawlance Ndejjo
Rawlance Ndejjo
RNRose Nampeera
Rose Nampeera
CUChukwuma David Umeokonkwo
Chukwuma David Umeokonkwo
RWRhoda K. Wanyenze
Rhoda K. Wanyenze
Death registration is a fundamental component of civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, providing essential data for public health monitor

21 September 2026 in Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRubangakene Moses
Rubangakene Moses
CKCaroline Kyozira
Caroline Kyozira
DBDouglas Bulafu
Douglas Bulafu
MEMgamb Elizabeth
Mgamb Elizabeth
RNRawlance Ndejjo
Rawlance Ndejjo
MAMuruta Allan
Muruta Allan
Background Developing countries like Uganda, face challenges in containing filovirus outbreaks such as Sudan virus disease (SVD). The 2025 Sudan Virus Disease outbreak in Uganda predominantly affected urban and peri-urban areas. To curtail the outbreak, mortality surveillance was integrated into the response strategies. This paper describes how mortality surveillance was implemented, its contribution to case detection and to the triggering of response actions, and the facilitators and barriers to its implementation during this outbreak. Methods A retrospective descriptive document review was conducted, analyzing situation reports, meeting minutes, technical briefs, and mortality surveillance summaries generated by the Incident Management Team between the declaration of the outbreak (30 January 2025) and its official end (26 April 2025). We described the implementation processes, the contribution of mortality surveillance to case detection and response, and the facilitators and barriers to its implementation during the 2025 Sudan virus disease (SVD) outbreak. Results During the 2025 Sudan Virus Disease outbreak, mortality surveillance was rapidly activated and integrated into active surveillance. Mortality surveillance was conducted systematically involving the following community engagement; death notification; epidemiological investigations; and containment measures such as contact tracing, quarantine, and safe and dignified burials. Mortality surveillance contributed to case detection: 3/14 (21.4%) cases registered during the outbreak were identified through investigations triggered by death alerts. These detections informed public health measures such as contact tracing and quarantine of contacts, which may have contributed to interrupting potential transmission chains. Key facilitators included strong coordination and leadership, the use of digitized data tools, capacity building and community engagement and involvement. Persistent barriers included underreporting from informal settlements and private clinics, logistical delays in sample transportation, and lack of mortality surveillance guidelines during the outbreak. Conclusion The 2025 Sudan virus disease outbreak in Uganda demonstrates the potential value of integrating mortality surveillance into outbreak detection and response, particularly in urban and informal settings. Strengthening mortality surveillance systems should be considered a core component of epidemic preparedness and response strategies in low- and middle-income countries facing recurrent filovirus threats.