The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare skiing economy and gross efficiency in cross-country skiers of different performance levels, ages and genders; male recreational skiers and elite senior and junior cross-country skiers of both genders. The skiers performed tests involving roller skiing on a treadmill using the gear 3 and diagonal stride techniques. The elite cross-country skiers were found to have better skiing economy and higher gross efficiency (5-18%) compared with the recreational skiers (p < 0.05) and the senior elite had better economy and higher efficiency (4-5%) than their junior counterparts (p < 0.05), whereas no differences could be found between the genders. Also, large ranges in economy and gross efficiency were found in all groups. It was concluded that, in addition to V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak, skiing economy and gross efficiency have a great influence on the differences in performance times between recreational and junior and senior elite cross-country skiers, as well as between individual skiers within the different categories. Thus, we recommend cross-country skiers at all performance levels to test not only V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak, but also skiing economy and efficiency.

The aim of this study was to investigate the air drag, frontal area and coefficient of drag of cross-country skiing classical and free style techniques. One highly skilled cross-country skier performed skiing-like classical and free style techniques on a force plate in a wind tunnel. The skier was also photographed from the front in order to analyze the projected frontal area, which was determined from digital images using Matlab. From the results of the air drag and the frontal area measurements, the drag coefficient was also calculated. The results can be used by researchers to calculate the theoretical effect of air drag on cross-country skiing performance.

Purpose: Heat-and-moisture-exchanging devices (HME) are commonly used by endurance athletes during training in sub-zero environments, but their effects on performance are unknown. We investigated the influence of HME usage on running performance at − 15 °C. Methods: Twenty-three healthy adults (15 male, 8 female; age 18–53 years; $$\dot{V}{\text O}_{2peak}$$V ˙ O 2 p e a k men 56 ± 7, women 50 ± 4 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹) performed two treadmill exercise tests with and without a mask-style HME in a randomised, crossover design. Participants performed a 30-min submaximal warm-up (SUB), followed by a 4-min maximal, self-paced running time-trial (TT). Heart rate (HR), respiratory frequency (f_R), and thoracic area skin temperature (T_sk) were monitored using a chest-strap device; muscle oxygenation (SmO₂) and deoxyhaemoglobin concentration ([HHb]) were derived from near-infra-red-spectroscopy sensors on m. vastus lateralis; blood lactate was measured 2 min before and after the TT. Results: HME usage reduced distance covered in the TT by 1.4%, despite similar perceived exertion, HR, f_R, and lactate accumulation. The magnitude of the negative effect of the HME on performance was positively associated with body mass (r² = 0.22). SmO₂ and [HHb] were 3.1% lower and 0.35 arb. unit higher, respectively, during the TT with HME, and T_sk was 0.66 °C higher during the HME TT in men. HR (+ 2.7 beats·min⁻¹) and T_sk (+ 0.34 °C) were higher during SUB with HME. In the male participants, SmO₂ was 3.8% lower and [HHb] 0.42 arb. unit higher during SUB with HME. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that HME usage impairs maximal running performance and increases the physiological demands of submaximal exercise.