Purpose: To evaluate and compare functional and structural outcomes of accelerated corneal crosslinking (A-CXL) using riboflavin with hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) vs conventional corneal crosslinking (C-CXL) using riboflavin with dextran. Setting: American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. Design: Retrospective analysis. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 83 eyes of 73 patients with mild to moderate keratoconus. First group (n = 44 eyes) underwent C-CXL using a 30-minute riboflavin/dextran soaking between June 2014 and March 2016. Second group (n = 39 eyes) underwent A-CXL using a 20-minute riboflavin/HPMC soaking between April 2016 and December 2017. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures were simulated keratometry (simK), maximum axial keratometry (Kmax), demarcation line depth, and haze intensity measured using optical coherence tomography–based image analysis software. Results: Demarcation line (DL) was 298.30 ± 64.60 μm and 335.61 ± 99.76 μm for C-CXL and A-CXL groups, respectively (P = .04). Haze profile was similar for both groups. The mean simK values were reduced from 46.93 ± 3.50 and 46.44 ± 2.93 preoperatively to 46.18 ± 3.65 and 45.54 ± 2.78 at 12 months postoperatively, for C-CXL and A-CXL, respectively (P = .003 for both groups). The mean Kmax decreased from 52.46 ± 4.82 and 51.50 ± 3.87 preoperatively to 51.30 ± 4.42 and 50.30 ± 3.52 postoperatively, for the C-CXL and A-CXL, respectively (P < .001 for both groups). There was no difference in the simK and Kmax changes between the C-CXL and A-CXL groups (P = .814 and P = .913), visual acuity, and refraction between the 2 groups (P > .05). Conclusions: A-CXL with a 20-minute riboflavin/HPMC soaking produced deeper DL and similar corneal haze, topographic, refractive, and visual results to C-CXL with a 30-minute riboflavin/dextran soaking.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is defined as the buildup of fluid within the retina in the extracellular space, specifically at the level of the macula in the inner nuclear, outer plexiform, Henle’s fiber layer, and subretinal space. Diabetes mellitus is one of the leading causes of visual impairment in industrialized countries and DME is the main reason for vision drop in diabetic patients. Several diagnostic methods are available for the characterization and staging of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and DME; the principal one for DME is optical coherence tomography (OCT), a quick and non-invasive technique that helps in decision-making for therapeutic choices based on biomarkers. Various classifications have been suggested over the years to aid in treatment management for DME. Current therapeutic options include laser photocoagulation, anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) intravitreal injections or corticosteroids, and surgery. Recently, a surgical approach has been proposed with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in case vitreomacular traction is present together with DME. Refractory DME is a challenging scenario, and it may be managed by switching to a different class of intravitreal medications or with surgical intervention or micropulse laser. Future perspectives include artificial intelligence algorithms based on OCT and OCT-angiography images which may improve diagnosis and treatment of DME with better preservation of visual acuity in diabetic patients.

In this study, we describe a case of graft dislocation into the vitreous cavity after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and review the risk factors and complications of posterior dislocation. A 70-year-old female with disruption of the iris–lens diaphragm experienced DSAEK graft dislocation into the vitreous cavity during air re-bubbling at 1 week postoperatively. The corneal opacity hindered adequate visualization of the vitreous cavity for the immediate retrieval of the graft. Five days after re-bubbling, vitrectomy and corneal tissue removal was performed using a temporary Eckardt keratoprosthesis, and penetrating keratoplasty was subsequently performed. Two weeks after graft removal, a retinal detachment occurred. Silicon oil was used as a tamponade to reattach the retina. Three months after the last procedure, the retina was attached, and the cornea was clear. Posterior dislocation of DSAEK graft is a rare complication. A disrupted iris–lens diaphragm and previous vitrectomy are the main risk factors. Severe vision loss is more likely to occur when corneal tissue removal is delayed. In cases of delayed removal, it is advisable to take precautions to prevent possible retinal detachment.