This paper presents the data set of Optic coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus Images of human eye. The OCT machine TOPCON'S 3D OCT-1000 camera is employed to acquire the images. The dataset is comprised of 50 images which includes control and glaucomatous images. For each OCT Image there is a corresponding fundus Image with annotation. Cup to disc ratio (CDR) values annotated by glaucoma specialists through fundus Images are provided in excel file. OCT images are optic nerve head (ONH) centred. Manually annotation is performed for the delineation of the Inner Limiting Membrane (ILM) Layer and Retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) layer with the help of ophthalmologist. The data is valuable for the development of automated algorithm for glaucoma diagnosis.

Glaucoma is a progressive and degenerative optic neuropathy that causes severe visual impairment or even blindness if left untreated. Glaucoma is majorly caused due to stress which increases intraocular pressure that leads towards optic nerve degeneration. The degenerative optic nerve then causes irreversible loss of peripheral vision which may lead to complete blindness. Although the progression of glaucoma can harshly affect the vision, it can be prevented if diagnosed in the early stages. However, optical coherence tomography (OCT) imagery is widely used by ophthalmologist for early glaucoma diagnosis and progression tracking. Owing to this objective screening capacity of the OCT imagery, many researchers have used it as an examination procedure to verify their clinical studies or to train their autonomous systems for mass-screening glaucomatous pathologies. In this paper, we present a systematic review of the recent studies that have proposed various solutions to mitigate glaucomatous progression using OCT imagery. Initially, we have presented a review of clinical studies that looked at glaucomatous diseases in OCT images.Furthermore, this paper presents a detailed survey of the state-of-the-art techniques for glaucoma detection and grading. In future directions, ganglion cell layer as well as macular analysis and its automation will improve the diagnostic power of OCT for the early glaucoma detection and especially monitoring its progression.

Background/Objectives: This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of seven publicly available large language models (LLMs)—GPT-3.5, GPT-4.o Mini, GPT-4.o, Gemini 1.5 Flash, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Grok3, and DeepSeek R1—in diagnosing corneal diseases, comparing their performance to human specialists. Methods: Twenty corneal disease cases from the University of Iowa’s EyeRounds were presented to each LLM. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by comparing LLM-generated diagnoses to the confirmed case diagnoses. Four human cornea specialists evaluated the same cases to establish a benchmark and assess interobserver agreement. Results: Diagnostic accuracy varied significantly among LLMs (p = 0.001). GPT-4.o achieved the highest accuracy (80.0%), followed by Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok3 (70.0%), DeepSeek R1 (65.0%), GPT-3.5 (60.0%), GPT-4.o Mini (55.0%), and Gemini 1.5 Flash (30.0%). Human experts averaged 92.5% accuracy, outperforming all LLMs (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = −1.314). GPT-4.o showed no significant difference from human consensus (p = 0.250, κ = 0.348), while Claude and Grok3 showed fair agreement (κ = 0.219). DeepSeek R1 also performed reasonably (κ = 0.178), although not significantly. Conclusions: Among the evaluated LLMs, GPT-4.o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Grok3, and DeepSeek R1 demonstrated promising diagnostic accuracy, with GPT-4.o most closely matching human performance. However, performance remained inconsistent, especially in complex cases. LLMs may offer value as diagnostic support tools, but human expertise remains indispensable for clinical decision-making.

Background: In this paper, we present an automated method for article classification, leveraging the power of large language models (LLMs). Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the applicability of various LLMs based on textual content of scientific ophthalmology papers. Methods: We developed a model based on natural language processing techniques, including advanced LLMs, to process and analyze the textual content of scientific papers. Specifically, we used zero-shot learning LLMs and compared Bidirectional and Auto-Regressive Transformers (BART) and its variants with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and its variants, such as distilBERT, SciBERT, PubmedBERT, and BioBERT. To evaluate the LLMs, we compiled a data set (retinal diseases [RenD] ) of 1000 ocular disease–related articles, which were expertly annotated by a panel of 6 specialists into 19 distinct categories. In addition to the classification of articles, we also performed analysis on different classified groups to find the patterns and trends in the field. Results: The classification results demonstrate the effectiveness of LLMs in categorizing a large number of ophthalmology papers without human intervention. The model achieved a mean accuracy of 0.86 and a mean F1-score of 0.85 based on the RenD data set. Conclusions: The proposed framework achieves notable improvements in both accuracy and efficiency. Its application in the domain of ophthalmology showcases its potential for knowledge organization and retrieval. We performed a trend analysis that enables researchers and clinicians to easily categorize and retrieve relevant papers, saving time and effort in literature review and information gathering as well as identification of emerging scientific trends within different disciplines. Moreover, the extendibility of the model to other scientific fields broadens its impact in facilitating research and trend analysis across diverse disciplines.