Marine L. Andersson

Dr. Marine L. Andersson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 December 2017 in Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMarine L. Andersson
Marine L. Andersson
YBYlva Böttiger
Ylva Böttiger
HKHenrik Kockum
Henrik Kockum
BEBirgit Eiermann
Birgit Eiermann

11 April 2023 in Drugs & Aging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLudvig Petersson
Ludvig Petersson
CSChristian Schörgenhofer
Christian Schörgenhofer
YAYlva Askfors
Ylva Askfors
HJHanna Justad
Hanna Justad
MDMarja-Liisa Dahl
Marja-Liisa Dahl
MAMarine L. Andersson
Marine L. Andersson
Background Polypharmacy in older people is steadily increasing and a combination of many medicines may result in adverse effects, especially if the medicines interact pharmacodynamically. Examples are additive or synergistic effects increasing the risk of falls, haemorrhage, serotonin syndrome and torsade de pointes. The clinical decision support system Janusmed Risk Profile has been developed to find such risks based on a patients’ medication list. Objectives The main aim of this retrospective register-based study was to study what pharmacodynamic risks older patients (aged 65 years or older) on polypharmacy (defined as using five or more medicines) are exposed to. Second, we studied if the introduction of the Janusmed Risk Profile in the main electronic health record system in Region Stockholm influenced the proportion of patients prescribed combinations that increase the risk for the nine adverse-effect categories defined (anticholinergic effects, haemorrhage, constipation, orthostatism, QT prolongation, renal toxicity, sedation, seizures and serotonin syndrome). Methods Data on all prescription medicines to individuals aged 65 years or older, and with at least five concomitant medicines were retrieved and analysed for the risk categories in the Janusmed Risk Profile. The proportions of patients with a high/moderate risk during a 4-month period before (period 1) and after (period 2) the introduction were compared. Results A total of 127,719 patients in period 1 (November 2016–February 2017), and 131,458 patients in period 2 (November 2017–February 2018) were included in the study. The proportion of patients with a high or moderate risk for each of the nine properties (anticholinergic effects, haemorrhage, constipation, orthostatism, QT prolongation, renal toxicity, sedation, seizures and serotonergic effects) were 10.9, 34.7, 32.8, 33.6, 17.2, 0.7, 15.4, 0.5 and 2.4%, respectively, in period 1 and 10.4, 35.5, 32.8, 33.3, 10.8, 0.71, 14.9, 0.5 and 2.3% in period 2. The changes for sedation and QT prolongation were statistically significant, with the most pronounced decrease for QT prolongation from 17.2 to 10.8% (p < 0.001). When analysing patients at a high risk, the decrease was significant for haemorrhage, orthostatism, QT prolongation and sedation. Conclusions Older people are exposed to combinations of medications that increase the risk for potentially severe adverse effects. Prescribers seem to respond especially to warnings for QT prolongation, presented in the Janusmed Risk Profile implemented in the electronic health record system.

15 November 2024 in Pharmacy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
THTora Hammar
Tora Hammar
EJEmma Jonsén
Emma Jonsén
OBOlof Björneld
Olof Björneld
YAYlva Askfors
Ylva Askfors
MAMarine L. Andersson
Marine L. Andersson
ALAlisa Lincke
Alisa Lincke
Adverse drug events (ADEs) occur frequently and are a common cause of suffering, hospitalizations, or death, and can be caused by harmful combinations of medications. One method used to prevent ADEs is by using clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). Janusmed Risk Profile is a CDSS evaluating the risk for nine common or serious ADEs resulting from combined pharmacodynamic effects. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of potential ADEs identified using CDSS algorithms from Janusmed Risk Profile. This retrospective, cross-sectional study covered the population of a Swedish region (n = 246,010 inhabitants in year 2020) using data on all medications dispensed and administered. More than 20% of patients had an increased risk of bleeding, constipation, orthostatism, or renal toxicity based on their medications. The proportion of patients with an increased risk varied from 3.5% to almost 30% across the nine categories of ADEs. A higher age was associated with an increased risk of potential ADEs and there were gender differences. A cluster analysis identified groups of patients with an increased risk for several categories of ADEs. This study shows that combinations of medications that could increase the risk of ADEs are common. Future studies should examine how this correlates with observed ADEs.

18 June 2025 in Cephalalgia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TWTherese Wennersten
Therese Wennersten
JLJonatan D. Lindh
Jonatan D. Lindh
ARA. Ingela M. Nilsson Remahl
A. Ingela M. Nilsson Remahl
MAMarine L. Andersson
Marine L. Andersson
MEMia von Euler
Mia von Euler
IEIsabella Ekheden
Isabella Ekheden
Background: Higher socioeconomic status (SES) among people with migraine has been associated with an increased use of triptans, but it is undetermined whether high SES is also associated with dispensation of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRPi), a prophylactic treatment against migraine episodes. Our hypothesis was that higher SES is associated with CGRPi dispensation, although the association is expected to be attenuated in a country that generally allows for reimbursement of CGRPi costs. Methods: In this register-based nested case-control study, the association between SES, categorized into three levels (low, middle and high) and the outcome of a first dispensation of a CGRPi was assessed among people with a migraine diagnosis in Region Stockholm, using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Of 52,996 individuals in the study population, 3.2% (n = 1674) were dispensed CGRPi. Individuals with high or middle SES had an increased probability of being dispensed CGRPi, compared to individuals with low SES (adjusted odds ratio = 1.68; 95% confidence interval = 1.46–1.92 and adjusted odds ratio = 1.41; 95% confidence interval = 1.24–1.61, respectively). Conclusions: Higher SES was associated with dispensation of CGRPi, which suggests unequal access to CGRPi.

15 July 2023 in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAA. B. Asplund
A. B. Asplund
PSP. Dreher Sköld
P. Dreher Sköld
LLL. Karlsson Lind
L. Karlsson Lind
CCCarolyn Cesta
Carolyn Cesta
MDM. L. Dahl
M. L. Dahl
MAMarine L. Andersson
Marine L. Andersson
Purpose: The purpose of this article is (1) to investigate which medicines are prescribed and dispensed to women the first 6 months postpartum, (2) to identify medicines dispensed postpartum but not recommended during breastfeeding, and (3) to find medicines commonly dispensed postpartum, but not currently included in Janusmed Breastfeeding. Methods: In this register-based cohort study covering births between January 2017 and August 2019, the Swedish Medical Birth Register (MBR), the Prescribed Drug Register, and Janusmed Breastfeeding were linked to identify medicines dispensed to women during the first 6 months postpartum, and how they are covered and classified in Janusmed Breastfeeding. Results: During the first 6 months postpartum, 66% of women purchased at least one prescription medicine from the pharmacy. The most common medicines were contraceptive agents, analgesics, antibiotics, and glucocorticoids. A third of the 30 most commonly dispensed medicines have no information available about the safety of use in breastfeeding. The most dispensed medicines, where the database advises against use in breastfeeding, included several antitussive agents, a local anaesthetic, and several gestagens. The most commonly dispensed medicines not covered by the Janusmed Breastfeeding were medicines for dry eyes, for assisted reproduction, and HIV. Conclusion: Prescribed medicines compatible with breastfeeding are more common during the first 6 months postpartum than medicines not compatible with breastfeeding, but medicines which lack evidence for safety in breastfeeding are still commonly used.

21 February 2024 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TBThorsten Bischof
Thorsten Bischof
CSChristoph Schaller
Christoph Schaller
NBNina Buchtele
Nina Buchtele
TSThomas Staudinger
Thomas Staudinger
RURoman Ullrich
Roman Ullrich
CSChristian Schörgenhofer
Christian Schörgenhofer
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a potential life-threatening, heterogenous, inflammatory lung disease. There are no data available on potential drug–drug interactions (pDDIs) in critically ill patients with ARDS. This study analyzed pDDIs in this specific cohort and aimed to investigate possible associations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an underlying cause of ARDS and treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with the occurrence of pDDIs. This retrospective study included patients ≥18 years of age diagnosed with ARDS between January 2010 and September 2021. The Janusmed database was used for the identification of pDDIs. A total of 2694 pDDIs were identified in 189 patients with a median treatment duration of 22 days. These included 323 (12%) clinically relevant drug combinations that are best avoided, corresponding to a median rate of 0.05 per day. There was no difference in the number of pDDIs between COVID-19- and non-COVID-19-associated ARDS. In patients treated with ECMO, the rate of the most severely graded pDDIs per day was significantly higher compared with those who did not require ECMO. PDDIs occur frequently in patients with ARDS. On average, each patient may encounter at least one clinically relevant drug combination that should be avoided during their intensive care unit stay.