We examined changes in skeletal muscle protein lactylation and acetylation in response to acute resistance exercise, chronic resistance training (RT), and a single endurance cycling bout. Additionally, we performed in vitro experiments to determine if different sodium lactate treatments affect myotube protein lactylation and acetylation. The acute and chronic RT study (12 college-aged participants) consisted of 10 weeks of unilateral leg extensor RT with vastus lateralis (VL) biopsies taken at baseline, 24 h following the first RT bout, and the morning of the last day of the RT bout. For the acute cycling study (9 college-aged participants), VL biopsies were obtained before, 2 h after, and 8 h after 60 min of cycling. For in vitro experiments, C2C12 myotubes were treated with varying levels of sodium lactate, including LOW (1 mM for 24 h), HIGH (10 mM for 24 h), and PULSE (10 mM for 30 min followed by 1 mM for 23.5-h). Neither acute nor chronic RT significantly affected nuclear or cytoplasmic protein lactylation. However, cytoplasmic protein acetylation was significantly reduced following one RT bout (−15%, p = 0.002) and chronic RT (−16%, p = 0.006). Cycling did not acutely alter post-exercise global protein lactylation or acetylation patterns. Lastly, varying 24 h lactate treatments did not alter nuclear or cytoplasmic protein lactylation or acetylation, cytoplasmic protein synthesis levels, or myotube diameters. These findings continue to support the idea that exercise induces more dynamic changes in skeletal muscle protein acetylation, but not lactylation. However, further human research with more sampling timepoints and a lactylomics approach are needed to determine if, at all, different exercise modalities affect skeletal muscle protein lactylation.

We explored, for the first time, the influence of androgen receptor (AR) through the separation of cytoplasmic and nuclear cell fractions [i.e., cytoplasmic androgen receptor (cAR), nuclear androgen receptor (nAR), and androgen receptor DNA-binding activity (AR-DNA)] on muscle hypertrophy responsiveness to resistance training. The absence of muscle hypertrophy in naïve individuals does not seem to be explained by baseline values, and acute or chronic changes in AR markers.

This study investigated the impact of menstrual cycle (MC) phases and resistance training (RT) on muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in two MCs utilizing a within-subject design. Twenty women with regular MCs had their legs randomly allocated to either the control (CON) or RT condition, which included 16 training sessions over two MCs. CSA, estradiol (E2), and progesterone (P4) were assessed during the menstruation (M), ovulation (O), and luteal (L) phases in the first (M1, O1, L1) and second (M2, O2, L2) MCs and at the beginning of the third MC (M3). P4 values were significantly higher during the luteal phase than during menstruation ( P < 0.0001) and ovulation ( P < 0.0001). No significant differences in E2 concentrations were observed between the MC phases ( P = 0.08). For the RT condition, the CSA showed significant increases at O2, L2, and M3 compared to baseline (M1) (all P < 0.0001). No significant changes were observed for the CON condition during the two MCs ( P > 0.05). However, RT condition showed a significant change in average CSA across two MCs. Additionally, individual analyses revealed that 19 participants showed variation in CSA above or below the minimum detectable difference during the two MCs. These findings suggest that changes in muscle CSA observed during two MCs may not be exclusively attributed to RT.