Oral anticoagulants (OAC) are recommended for preventing stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. Proper use is imperative for maximizing anticoagulation therapy’s effectiveness and safety. In preparation for the implementation of a smartphone-based SmartMed app (application) aiming to promote patient self-management, medication adherence, and data collection for patients on anticoagulation therapy, its usability assessment can ensure the value of OAC app development and adoption. We evaluated the SmartMed app’s usability using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the app-specific domain of the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) for its perceived impact on taking OAC regularly. We recruited 25 OAC users and their home caregivers and 59 healthcare professionals, including pharmacists, nurses, and cardiac surgeons from one medical center and one regional hospital in Taiwan. All participants (n = 84) thought the SmartMed app was useful, with mean SUS and MARS scores of 81.49 (±14.42) and 4.65 (±0.49), respectively. Usability evaluation revealed that fewer experiences with smartphone apps and different healthcare professionals (pharmacists versus nurses or cardiac surgeons) were associated with lower SUS scores and perceived impact. Throughout the evaluation process, the SmartMed app’s design was considered helpful from multiple stakeholders’ perspectives. Further ongoing mobile technology supports are necessary to establish the SmartMed app’s effectiveness.

Background: Everolimus is approved for treating breast, renal, and pancreatic neuroendocrine cancers but carries the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBVr) and hepatitis. However, data on HBVr in everolimus-treated patients are limited. This study evaluates the risk of hepatitis and HBVr in cancer patients with current or past HBV infection. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients prescribed everolimus between 1 January 2011 and 31 May 2022, using a private healthcare system database in Taiwan. Patients with HBsAg positivity or HBsAg negativity and anti-HBs or anti-HBc results were included. The cumulative incidence function and risk of hepatitis from a competing risk model, which estimates Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard (SDH), were analyzed across different HBV serological subgroups. The risk of hepatitis B reactivation was also calculated. Results: Of 377 patients, 45% (36/80) of HBsAg-positive and 0.67% (2/297) of HBsAg-negative patients received nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) prophylaxis. Hepatitis occurred in 28.75% of HBsAg-positive and 17.85% of HBsAg-negative patients. Baseline HBsAg positivity and exemestane use increased hepatitis risk. HBVr occurred in 11.36% (5/44) of HBsAg-positive patients without NUCs and 5.56% (2/36) with prophylaxis. Two HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive patients developed severe HBVr-related hepatitis. Conclusion: Hepatitis occurred in 28.75% of HBsAg-positive and 17.85% of HBsAg-negative patients on everolimus. HBVr was common in HBsAg-positive patients but rare in HBsAg-negative individuals. HBV screening and liver function monitoring are critical for patients with past or current HBV infection receiving everolimus, especially in endemic areas.