This article presents the effect of cutting speed on heat-affected zone (HAZ) and surface roughness in laser cutting of AISI316L stainless steel. Test samples were cut with varying cutting speed, while other process parameters remained constant. Surface roughness of each test sample was measured in several places along cut depth. Photos of cut surfaces were taken with the use of stereoscopic microscope equipped with a camera. Results were analyzed, discussed and conclusions regarding the effect of cutting speed on surface roughness and HAZ were drawn.
This study presents the effect of cutting speed on surface roughness in abrasive water jet cutting of 10mm thick stainless steel samples. Photographs of cut surfaces were taken and roughness parameters were measured in different locations across depth of cut. Differences between obtained surface geometric structures and measured roughness parameter values were presented and discussed. The research has shown a considerable effect of cutting speed on surface roughness, surface quality and presence of machining marks. This effect was especially noticeable in lower parts of examined cut surfaces
The aim of this study was to analyse in detail the effect of varying the parameters of the Johnson–Cook (JC) material model on the results of a numerical simulation of the orthogonal turning process of the Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. The first step involved an experimental study, including the recording of cutting force components and temperature, as well as the measurement of chip geometry, which was used to validate the FEM simulation. This was followed by a sensitivity analysis of the JC model with respect to five parameters, namely A, B, C, m, and n, each modified independently by ±20%. The effects of these changes on cutting forces, cutting zone temperature, stresses, and chip geometry were evaluated. The results showed that parameters A, B, and m had the greatest influence on the physical quantities analysed, while C and n are of secondary importance. The analysis highlighted the need for precise calibration of the JC model parameters, especially when modelling machining processes involving difficult-to-machine materials. The results provided practical guidance for optimising the selection of constitutive parameters in machining simulations.
Numerical simulations of the cutting process play a key role in manufacturing and cost optimization. Inherent in finite element analysis (FEA) simulations is the correct description of material behavior during machining. For this purpose, various material models are used to describe the behavior of the material in the range of high deformation, high temperature values, and high strain rates. Very often the Johnson–Cook (JC) material model is used for this purpose; however, the correct determination of the material constants of this model is a key aspect. Therefore, this paper presents a procedure for determining the material constants of the JC model using an analytical method based on normalized tensile and compression testing of the material for different strain rates over a wide temperature range. After determining the material constants, the authors conducted numerical simulations of the orthogonal turning of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy using the obtained constants. Validation of the obtained results with those obtained in experimental studies was also carried out. The outcomes demonstrated that the difference between FEM simulation and experimental tests did not exceed 0.02 mm (14%) in the case of chip thickness,. Much smaller differences were obtained for the temperature in the cutting zone, where the maximum difference was about 45 °C (4%). Comparing the components of the cutting force, we found that, in the case of the main cutting force, in most cases, the differences did not exceed 70 N (8%). After the verification of the obtained results, it was also found that the determined material constants of the Johnson–Cook model can be successfully used in FEM modeling of the cutting process of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy for the adopted range of values of technological parameters.