The management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has evolved significantly over the last decades. STEMI treatment includes reperfusion therapy, ideally by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), modern antithrombotic therapy and secondary prevention measures. Even though many areas in the management of STEMI are well studied and analyzed in the guidelines, there are still challenges and unanswered questions on how to improve outcomes. This review aims to offer an insight in areas that need to be explored.

Remnant cholesterol (RC) is an emerging factor contributing to residual risk for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We aimed to investigate the association of RC with ASCVD in high ASCVD risk patients. RC was calculated in 906 participants (178 low/moderate-risk and 728 high-risk) consecutively recruited from a vascular registry. Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis was assessed by B-mode carotid ultrasonography. Maximal carotid wall thickness (maxWT) and carotid atherosclerotic burden (n ≥ 2 atherosclerotic plaques) were set as the vascular outcomes. An independent cohort of 87 consecutively recruited high-risk patients who were followed for their lipid profile for 3 months was also analyzed. RC was increased in the high-risk group as compared to controls (26 ± 17 vs. 21 ± 11 mg/dl, respectively, p < 0.001). Increased RC levels were independently associated with increased maxWT and carotid atherosclerotic burden (p < 0.05), after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (TRF) and ASCVD. RC levels were associated with the presence of flow-limiting ASCVD and coronary artery disease (CAD) (p < 0.05), after adjustment for TRFs. These associations remained significant in those not receiving hypolipidemic treatment and in treated individuals achieving LDL-C<100 mg/dl. In the prospective cohort, there was no significant interaction between change in RC levels and hypolipidemic status, as contrasted to LDL-C levels (p < 0.001). In a high-risk population, RC was associated with subclinical and clinically overt ASCVD, particularly in patients with the most adverse lipid phenotype (untreated) or in treated patients with a low LDL-related risk profile. These findings support a residual pro-atherosclerotic role of RC in high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with post–coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) has a high diagnostic accuracy for visualization of grafts. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in patients with CABG is associated with increased procedural time, contrast agent administration, radiation exposure, and complications, compared with non-CABG patients. The aim of this multicenter, randomized controlled trial was to compare the strategy of CCTA-guided ICA versus classic ICA in patients with prior CABG. METHODS: Patients with prior CABG were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to have a CCTA before ICA (CCTA-ICA, group A) or not (ICA-only, group B). The primary end point of the study was the total volume (milliliters) of the contrast agent administered. RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were randomized, and 225 were included in analysis; 110 in group A and 115 in group B. The total contrast volume was higher in group A (184.5 [143–255] versus 154 [102–240] mL; P =0.001). The contrast volume administered during the invasive procedure was lower in group A (101.5 [60–151] versus 154 [102–240]; P <0.001). Total fluoroscopy time was decreased in group A (480 [259–873] versus 594 [360–1080] seconds; P =0.027), but total effective dose was increased (24.1 [17.7–32] versus 10.8 [5.6–18] mSv; P <0.001). The rate of contrast-induced nephropathy, periprocedural complications, and major adverse cardiac events during 3 to 5 and 30 days did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: A CCTA-directed ICA strategy for patients with CABG is associated with expedition of the invasive procedure, and less fluoroscopy time, at the cost of higher total contrast volume and effective radiation dose, compared with the classic ICA approach. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04631809.

The so-called “smoking paradox”, conditioning lower mortality in smokers among STEMI patients, has seldom been addressed in the settings of modern primary PCI protocols. The ISACS–STEMI COVID-19 is a large-scale retrospective multicenter registry addressing in-hospital mortality, reperfusion, and 30-day mortality among primary PCI patients in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the 16,083 STEMI patients, 6819 (42.3%) patients were active smokers, 2099 (13.1%) previous smokers, and 7165 (44.6%) non-smokers. Despite the impaired preprocedural recanalization (p < 0.001), active smokers had a significantly better postprocedural TIMI flow compared with non-smokers (p < 0.001); this was confirmed after adjustment for all baseline and procedural confounders, and the propensity score. Active smokers had a significantly lower in-hospital (p < 0.001) and 30-day (p < 0.001) mortality compared with non-smokers and previous smokers; this was confirmed after adjustment for all baseline and procedural confounders, and the propensity score. In conclusion, in our population, active smoking was significantly associated with improved epicardial recanalization and lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality compared with previous and non-smoking history.

The unprecedented for modern medicine pandemic caused by the SARS-COV-2 virus (“coronavirus”, Covid-19 disease) creates in turn new data on the management and survival of cardiac arrest victims, but mainly on the safety of CardioPulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) providers. The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in losses of thousands of lives, and many more people were hospitalized in simple or in intensive care unit beds, both globally and locally in Greece. More specifically, in victims of cardiac arrest, both in- and out- of hospital, the increased mortality and high contagiousness of the SARS-CoV-2 virus posed new questions, of both medical and moral nature/ to CPR providers. What we all know in resuscitation, that we cannot harm the victim and therefore do the most/best we can, is no longer the everyday reality. What we need to know and incorporate into decision-making in the resuscitation process is the distribution of limited human and material resources, the potentially very poor outcome of patients with Covid-19 and cardiac arrest, and especially that a potential infection of health professionals can lead in the lack of health professionals in the near future. This review tries to incorporate the added skills and precautions for CPR providers in terms of both in- and out- hospital CPR.

Background: The constraints in the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during the COVID-19 pandemic have been suggested to have severely impacted mortality levels. The aim of the current analysis is to evaluate the age-related effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mechanical reperfusion and 30-day mortality for STEMI within the registry ISACS-STEMI COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective multicenter registry was performed in high-volume PPCI centers on four continents and included STEMI patients undergoing PPCI in March–June 2019 and 2020. Patients were divided according to age (< or ≥75 years). The main outcomes were the incidence and timing of PPCI, (ischemia time longer than 12 h and door-to-balloon longer than 30 min), and in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Results: We included 16,683 patients undergoing PPCI in 109 centers. In 2020, during the pandemic, there was a significant reduction in PPCI as compared to 2019 (IRR 0.843 (95%-CI: 0.825–0.861, p < 0.0001). We found a significant age-related reduction (7%, p = 0.015), with a larger effect on elderly than on younger patients. Furthermore, we observed significantly higher 30-day mortality during the pandemic period, especially among the elderly (13.6% vs. 17.9%, adjusted HR (95% CI) = 1.55 [1.24–1.93], p < 0.001) as compared to younger patients (4.8% vs. 5.7%; adjusted HR (95% CI) = 1.25 [1.05–1.49], p = 0.013), as a potential consequence of the significantly longer ischemia time observed during the pandemic. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the treatment of patients with STEMI, with a 16% reduction in PPCI procedures, with a larger reduction and a longer delay to treatment among elderly patients, which may have contributed to increase in-hospital and 30-day mortality during the pandemic.