Pesticide exposure poses significant environmental and human health concerns, particularly given its extensive use in agricultural activities. The assessment of pesticide risks is a multifaceted and resource-intensive process, often requiring time-consuming toxicity studies. In response to this challenge, advanced computational models, remote sensing, and GIS (geographic information systems) have emerged as efficient and precise tools for evaluating pesticide exposure risks. This comprehensive review aims to provide an in-depth examination of the latest research methodologies for assessing the risks associated with pesticide exposure and their practical applications. These methodologies encompass the assessment of pesticide exposure in air, soil, and water, offering a comprehensive understanding of potential environmental pathways. The paper also delves into the effective utilization of these tools for pesticide risk assessment and examines the potential implications of their findings. The approaches outlined in this review hold promise for a thorough and insightful assessment of pesticide risks and are positioned to equip researchers and policymakers with valuable knowledge to mitigate the impacts of pesticide exposure on human health and the environment.

This study explores the relationship between land use and land cover (LULC) changes and a significant cyclogenesis event that occurred in Alabama’s Black Belt region from 6 to 7 October 2021. Utilizing the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, two scenarios were analyzed: the WRF Control Run, which maintained unchanged LULC, and the WRF Sensitivity Experiment, which converted 56.5% of forested areas into cropland to assess the impact on storm dynamics. Quantitative comparisons of predicted rainfall from both simulations were conducted against observed data. The control run demonstrated a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 1.64, indicating accurate rainfall predictions. In contrast, the modified scenario yielded an RMSE of 2.01, suggesting lower reliability. The Mean Bias (MB) values were 1.32 for the control run and 1.58 for the modified scenario, revealing notable discrepancies in accuracy. The coefficient of determination (R²) was 0.247 for the control run and 0.270 for the modified scenario. The Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) value was 0.1567 for the control run but dropped to −0.2257 following LULC modifications. Sensitivity analyses revealed a 60% increase in heat flux and a 36% rise in precipitation, underscoring the significant impact of LULC on meteorological outcomes. While this study concentrated on the Black Belt region, the methodologies employed could apply to various other areas, though caution is advised when generalizing these results to different climates and socio-economic contexts. Further research is necessary to enhance the model’s applicability across diverse environments.

Soil salinization presents a significant challenge, driven by factors such as inadequate drainage, shallow aquifers, and high evaporation rates, threatening global food security. The sunflower emerges as a key cash crop in such areas, providing the opportunity to convert its straw into biochar, which offers additional agronomic and environmental benefits. This study investigates the effectiveness of biochar interlayers in enhancing salt leaching and suppressing upward salt migration through integrated laboratory and field experiments. The effectiveness of varying biochar interlayer application rates was assessed in promoting salt leaching, decreasing soil electrical conductivity (EC), and enhancing crop performance in saline soils through a systematic approach that combines laboratory and field experiments. The biochar treatments included a control (CK) and different applications of 20 (BL20), 40 (BL40), 60 (BL60), and 80 (BL80) tons of biochar per hectare, all applied below a depth of 20 cm, with each treatment replicated three times. The laboratory and field experimental setups maintained consistency in terms of biochar treatments and interlayer placement methodology. During the laboratory column experiments, the soil columns were treated with deionized water, and their leachates were analyzed for EC and major ionic components. The results showed that columns with biochar interlayers exhibited significantly higher efflux rates compared to those of the control and notably accelerated the time required for the effluent EC to decrease to 2 dS m⁻¹. The CK required 43 days for full discharge and 38 days for EC stabilization below 2 dS m⁻¹. In contrast, biochar treatments notably reduced these times, with BL80 achieving discharge in just 7 days and EC stabilization in 10 days. Elution events occurred 20–36 days earlier in the biochar-treated columns, confirming biochar’s effectiveness in enhancing leaching efficiency in saline soils. The field experiment results supported the laboratory findings, indicating that increased biochar application rates significantly reduced soil EC and ion concentrations at depths of 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm, lowering the EC from 7.12 to 2.25 dS m⁻¹ and from 6.30 to 2.41 dS m⁻¹ in their respective layers. The application of biochar interlayers resulted in significant reductions in Na⁺, K⁺, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Cl⁻, SO₄²⁻, and HCO₃⁻ concentrations across both soil layers. In the 0–20 cm layer, Na⁺ decreased from 3.44 to 2.75 mg·g⁻¹, K⁺ from 0.24 to 0.11 mg·g⁻¹, Ca²⁺ from 0.35 to 0.20 mg·g⁻¹, Mg²⁺ from 0.31 to 0.24 mg·g⁻¹, Cl⁻ from 1.22 to 0.88 mg·g⁻¹, SO₄²⁻ from 1.91 to 1.30 mg·g⁻¹ and HCO₃⁻ from 0.39 to 0.18 mg·g⁻¹, respectively. Similarly, in the 20–40 cm layer, Na⁺ declined from 3.62 to 3.05 mg·g⁻¹, K⁺ from 0.28 to 0.12 mg·g⁻¹, Ca²⁺ from 0.39 to 0.26 mg·g⁻¹, Mg²⁺ from 0.36 to 0.27 mg·g⁻¹, Cl⁻ from 1.18 to 0.80 mg·g⁻¹, SO₄²⁻ from 1.95 to 1.33 mg·g⁻¹ and HCO₃⁻ from 0.42 to 0.21 mg·g⁻¹ under increasing biochar rates. Moreover, the use of biochar interlayers significantly improved the physiological traits of sunflowers, including their photosynthesis rates, stomatal conductance, and transpiration efficiency, thereby boosting biomass and achene yield. These results highlight the potential of biochar interlayers as a sustainable strategy for soil desalination, water conservation, and enhanced crop productivity. This approach is especially promising for managing salt-affected soils in regions like California, where soil salinization represents a considerable threat to agricultural sustainability.

It is essential to emphasize the significant impacts of climate change, which are evident in the form of severe and prolonged droughts, hurricanes, snowstorms, and other climatic disturbances. These challenges are particularly pronounced in urban environments and among human populations. The situation is further aggravated by the increasing utilization of available open spaces for residential and industrial development, leading to heightened energy consumption, elevated pollution levels, and increased carbon emissions, all of which negatively affect public health. The primary objective of this review article is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of current research, with a particular focus on the innovative use of residual biomass from urban vegetation for biochar production in the United States. This research entails an exhaustive review of existing literature to assess the implementation of a carbon-negative wood biomass biochar system as a strategic approach to sustainable urban management. By transforming urban wood waste—including tree trimmings, construction debris, and storm-damaged timber—into biochar through pyrolysis, a thermochemical process that sequesters carbon while generating renewable energy, we can leverage this valuable resource. The resulting biochar offers a range of co-benefits: it enhances soil health, improves water retention, reduces stormwater runoff, and lowers greenhouse gas emissions when applied in urban green spaces, agriculture, and land restoration projects. This review highlights the advantages and potential of converting urban wood waste into biochar while exploring how municipalities can strengthen their green ecosystems. Furthermore, it aims to provide a thorough understanding of how the utilization of woody biomass biochar can contribute to mitigating urban carbon emissions across the United States.

Soil salinity poses a major challenge to agricultural productivity, especially threatening food security in arid and semi-arid areas. Traditional soil reclamation methods, such as leaching, chemical amendments, and drainage engineering, usually need large amounts of water, involve high costs, and can lead to environmental problems. This review compiles existing knowledge on innovative strategies for managing saline soils, focusing on buried interlayer systems that use materials like straw, sand, gravel–sand mixtures, and biochar. These interlayers improve soil hydraulic properties by preventing capillary rise, encouraging salt leaching, and reducing surface salt buildup. Biochar stands out as a particularly useful material because of its stability, large surface area, porosity, and high cation exchange capacity. These features help improve soil structure, increase water retention, and effectively retain sodium. Evidence from lab and field tests shows that buried biochar layers can stop salt from moving upward, aid in desalinating the root zone, and boost crop yields. While straw and sand interlayers show potential in reducing salinity, biochar is noted for its multifunctionality and long-term effectiveness in addressing salinity problems. The success of buried biochar systems depends on several factors, including the properties of the biochar, how much is used, how deep it is buried, and the specific soil and climate conditions. This review highlights how these systems work, compares their performance, and points out research gaps, advocating for their potential as a sustainable, resource-efficient way to manage salinity and improve soil health over the long term. A substantial proportion of the existing evidence is derived from controlled laboratory studies, and the buried biochar layer approach remains an emerging technique that requires further validation under field conditions. Still, significant knowledge gaps persist regarding long-term performance and water-salt dynamics, while site-specific soil variability and scalability challenges may limit the effective implementation of biochar interlayer systems under field conditions.

Soil health is fundamental to sustainable agriculture, crop productivity, and vital ecosystem services. However, climate change increasingly threatens the functional integrity of soil due to rising temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, and extreme weather events. These factors accelerate soil degradation and disrupt the physical, chemical, and biological processes essential for maintaining soil health. This review synthesizes recent evidence regarding the impacts of climate change on soil health and crop production, while also evaluating sustainable management strategies designed to enhance agricultural resilience. Techniques such as conservation agriculture, organic matter management, diversified cropping systems, and integrated nutrient management can improve soil structure, nutrient cycling, water retention, carbon sequestration, and overall crop productivity. Furthermore, emerging technologies offer new opportunities for real-time, site-specific, and data-driven soil management. These technologies include remote sensing, geographic information systems, artificial intelligence, digital agriculture, and advanced soil monitoring tools. Additionally, policy and socioeconomic factors—particularly financial incentives, extension services, and institutional support—are critical in encouraging farmers to adopt these practices. Despite recent advancements, challenges such as economic barriers, technological limitations, regional variability, and a lack of long-term evidence hinder the widespread implementation of sustainable soil health practices. This review provides an integrated perspective that links climate-driven changes in soil’s physical, chemical, and biological properties with sustainable management practices, emerging technologies, and policy support. It highlights the interactions and trade-offs among these components to promote climate-resilient and sustainable agricultural systems.