This article presents a comprehensive review of lithium as a strategic resource, specifically in the production of batteries for electric vehicles. This study examines global lithium reserves, extraction sources, purification processes, and emerging technologies such as direct lithium extraction methods. This paper also explores the environmental and social impacts of lithium extraction, emphasizing the need for sustainable and ethical practices within the supply chain. As electric vehicles are projected to account for over 60% of new car sales by 2030, the demand for high-performance batteries will persist, with lithium playing a key role in this transition, even with the development of alternatives to lithium-ion batteries, such as sodium and ammonium-based technologies. However, there is an urgent need for technological advancements to reduce the environmental impact of lithium production and lithium-ion battery manufacturing. Additionally, ensuring the safety of LiBs during both use and recycling stages is critical to sustainable EV adoption. This study concludes that advancements in battery recycling and the development of new technologies are essential to improving safety, reducing costs, and minimizing environmental impacts, thereby securing a sustainable lithium supply and supporting the future of electric mobility.

The global transition toward renewable energy and decarbonization is intrinsically linked to the management of critical materials. Rare Earth Elements (REEs) are no exception, as they play a strategic role at the center of climate goals. Therefore, this review provides a comprehensive assessment of the REE landscape, explicitly addressing the proposed Demand-Sustainability-Risk Nexus (DSR-Nexus), which integrates technological demand, environmental sustainability, and geopolitical supply risks. A systematic review based on PRISMA methodology was conducted to analyze scientific contributions published between 2015 and 2026, revealing a significant research imbalance. By 2025, while 87% of works focus on resource availability, production, and recycling, only 1.4% address the global supply chain and its geopolitical implications. Key findings highlight that China’s dominance in mining, processing, and refining capacities, accounting for 69.5%, 92%, and 94%, respectively, creates structural vulnerabilities for future environmental goals. In contrast, emerging producers such as Malaysia and the United States are expected to contribute 9% and 8% of refining capacity, respectively. Furthermore, this review discusses environmental trade-offs, including high energy intensity, water consumption, and radioactive byproducts. It also examines mitigation strategies, such as recycling, urban mining, and material substitution. Ultimately, achieving a resilient energy transition requires expanding supply, strengthening circular strategies, and international cooperation.