Resumo Objetivou-se identificar diferenças no consumo alimentar, segundo marcadores de alimentação saudável e não saudável, entre adultos residentes nas áreas urbanas e rurais do Brasil. Realizou-se estudo transversal com dados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde (2013). A alimentação foi avaliada por marcadores de alimentação saudável e não saudável. Estimou-se as prevalências (%) e modelos de regressão logística sequencial foram ajustados para estimar odds ratio (OR) e intervalos de confiança (IC95%). Verificou-se maior consumo de frutas e hortaliças, peixes, refrigerantes e substituições de refeições nas áreas urbanas, enquanto que, o consumo de carne com gorduras e feijão foi maior nas áreas rurais. Análises ajustadas mostraram maior consumo regular de feijão e de carne com excesso de gordura; e menor consumo de refrigerantes, de frutas e hortaliças e de substituição de refeições por lanches nas áreas rurais em comparação com as urbanas. Tendências semelhantes foram observadas nas macrorregiões do país. As diferenças no consumo alimentar de brasileiros residentes em áreas rurais e urbanas denotam a importância de fomentar políticas de alimentação que respeitem e valorizem as tradições e a cultura alimentar.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quantity and diversity in the consumption fruits and vegetables, as well as its relationship with the consumer’s purchase characteristics and food environment. METHODS: Baseline study stemming from a controlled and randomized community trial investigating a sample representative of Primary Health Care services (Health Academy Program) of Belo Horizonte, state of Minas Gerais. The intake of fruits and vegetables was analyzed in servings/day, whereas diversity was assessed by the Food Frequency Questionnaire. Users were also questioned on the frequency, purchase location and availability of these foods at their households. To assess the consumer’s food environment, commercial establishments within a 1.6 km radius around the program unit sampled were audited. RESULTS: 3,414 adults and older adults (88.1% women) were investigated, as well as 336 commercial establishments, in 18 units of the Health Academy Program. The average consumption of fruits and vegetables was adequate [5.4 (SD = 2.1) servings/day] but monotonous, with average daily intake of two different types. In the establishments audited, a good diversity (77.7% and 85.0%) and variety (74.5% and 81.4%) of fruits and vegetables was observed, although with lower quality of vegetables (60.4%). After adjusting for sociodemographic variables, we identified that knowledge on food crops (p = 0.006), increased monthly availability of fruits at households (p < 0.001), and greater variety of fruits (p = 0.03) and quality of vegetables (p = 0.05) in commercial establishments could improve the quantitative intake of fruits and vegetables, whereas a greater variety of fruits (p = 0.008) would increase consumption diversity. CONCLUSIONS: The intake of fruits and vegetables was quantitatively adequate but monotonous, being influences by the consumer environment. Such results highlight the need for improving educational actions in health services and programs, in addition to acting on the consumer environment, aiming to promote and maintain the adequate and diversified consumption, as recommended by Brazilian guidelines for proper and healthy eating.

This study aims to describe the adequacy of basic health units (UBS) in Brazil regarding structure and work process for obesity management and to evaluate user satisfaction with primary health care services. This cross-sectional study was conducted with data from the 2013-2014 National Program for Improving Primary Care Access and Quality (PMAQ) - an initiative to assess primary health care teams’ performance. Data were collected between 2013 and 2014 through interviews with primary health care teams and users. All indicators of adequate care for obesity were defined within the article scope, based on data from the PMAQ. Of the 24,055 UBS analyzed, located in 4,845 different cities, only 7.6% had adequate structure for obesity management. Likewise, only 26.6% of the 114,615 users interviewed reported adequate access, and 27.8% of the UBS showed adequate service organization. Healthcare was considered as “good” or “very good” by 82.4% of users. These indicators varied according to geographic region, showing better results for the South and Southeast. Our results suggest that the country may still be at the initial stage of systematizing care with obesity, presenting significant disparities among regions.

PERCURSO METODOLÓGICO DE ENSAIO COMUNITÁRIO CONTROLADO EM SERVIÇO DE SAÚDE: PESQUISA EPIDEMIOLÓGICA TRANSLACIONAL EM NUTRIÇÃO

Objective: To examine associations between economic residential segregation and prevalence of healthy and unhealthy eating markers.Design: Cross-sectional. A stratified sample was selected in a three-stage process. Prevalence of eating markers and their 95 % CI were estimated according to economic residential segregation: high (most segregated); medium (integrated) and low (less segregated or integrated). Segregation was measured at the census tract and assessed using the Getis–Ord local $G_i^{\rm{\ast}}$ statistic based on the proportion of heads of household in a neighbourhood earning a monthly income of 0–3 minimum wages. Binary logistic regression using generalized estimating equations were used to model the associations.Setting: Belo Horizonte, Brazil.Participants: Adults (n1301) residing in the geographical environment (178 census tracts) of ten units of the Brazilian primary-care service known as the Health Academy Program.Results: Of the 1301 participants, 27·7 % lived in highly segregated neighbourhoods, where prevalence of regular consumption of fruit was lower compared with more affluent areas (34·6v. 53·2 %, respectively). Likewise, regular consumption of vegetables (70·1v. 87·6 %), fish (23·6v. 42·3 %) and replacement of lunch or dinner with snacks (0·8v. 4·7 %) were lower in comparison to more affluent areas. In contrast, regular consumption of beans was higher (91·0v. 79·5 %). The associations of high-segregated neighbourhood with consumption of vegetables (OR = 0·62; 95 % CI 0·39, 0·98) and beans (OR = 1·85; 95 % CI 1·07, 3·19) remained significant after adjustments.Conclusions: Economic residential segregation was associated with healthy eating markers even after adjustments for individual-level factors and perceived food environment.