Ashish Bhargava

Dr. Ashish Bhargava

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 May 2020 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAshish Bhargava
Ashish Bhargava
EFElisa Akagi Fukushima
Elisa Akagi Fukushima
MLMiriam Levine
Miriam Levine
WZWei Zhao
Wei Zhao
FTFarah Tanveer
Farah Tanveer
LSLouis Saravolatz
Louis Saravolatz
Background: COVID-19 is a pandemic disease caused by a novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Predictors for severe COVID-19 infection have not been well defined. Determination of risk factors for severe infection would enable identifying patients who may benefit from aggressive supportive care and early intervention.Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of 197 patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary academic medical center.Results: Of 197 hospitalized patients, the mean (SD) age of the cohort was 60.6 (16.2) years, 103 (52.3%) were male, and 156 (82.1%) were black. Severe COVID-19 infection was noted in 74 (37.6%) patients, requiring intubation. Patients aged above 60 were significantly more likely to have severe infection. Patients with severe infection were significantly more likely to have diabetes, renal disease, and chronic pulmonary disease and had significantly higher white blood cell counts, lower lymphocyte counts, and increased C-reactive protein (CRP) than patients with nonsevere infection. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, risk factors for severe infection included pre-existing renal disease (odds ratio [OR], 7.4; 95% CI, 2.5–22.0), oxygen requirement at hospitalization (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3–6.7), acute renal injury (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3–5.6), and CRP on admission (OR, 1.006; 95% CI, 1.001–1.01). Race, age, and socioeconomic status were not independent predictors.Conclusions: Acute or pre-existing renal disease, supplemental oxygen upon hospitalization, and admission CRP were independent predictors for the development of severe COVID-19. Every 1-unit increase in CRP increased the risk of severe disease by 0.06%.

11 August 2009 in Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAshish Bhargava
Ashish Bhargava
UVUlka N Vaishampayan
Ulka N Vaishampayan
Background: In recent years, JM-216/satraplatin (GPC Biotech, Inc.) has emerged as a novel oral platinum analogue with a better toxicity profile than cisplatin. Since satraplatin is more hydrophobi...

1 March 2014 in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SDSorabh Dhar
Sorabh Dhar
DMDror Marchaim
Dror Marchaim
RTRyan Tansek
Ryan Tansek
TCTeena Chopra
Teena Chopra
AYAdnan Yousuf
Adnan Yousuf
KKKeith S. Kaye
Keith S. Kaye
Objective.: To determine whether increases in contact isolation precautions are associated with decreased adherence to isolation practices among healthcare workers (HCWs).Design.: Prospective cohort study from February 2009 to October 2009.Setting.: Eleven teaching hospitals.Participants.: HCWs.Methods.: One thousand thirteen observations conducted on HCWs. Additional data included the number of persons in isolation, types of HCWs, and hospital-specific contact precaution practices. Main outcome measures included compliance with individual components of contact isolation precautions (hand hygiene before and after patient encounter, donning of gown and glove upon entering a patient room, and doffing upon exiting) and overall compliance (all 5 measures together) during varying burdens of isolation.Results.: Compliance with hand hygiene was as follows: prior to donning gowns/gloves, 37.2%; gowning, 74.3%; gloving, 80.1%; doffing of gowns/gloves, 80.1%; after gown/glove removal, 61%. Compliance with all components was 28.9%. As the burden of isolation increased (20% or less to greater than 60%), a decrease in compliance with hand hygiene (43.6%—4.9%) and with all 5 components (31.5%—6.5%) was observed. In multivariable analysis, there was an increase in noncompliance with all 5 components of the contact isolation precautions bundle (odds ratio [OR], 6.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-37.44];P= .03) and in noncompliance with hand hygiene prior to donning gowns and gloves (OR, 10.1 [95% CI, 1.84—55.54];P= .008) associated with increasing burden of isolation.Conclusions.: As the proportion of patients in contact isolation increases, compliance with contact isolation precautions decreases. Placing 40% of patients under contact precautions represents a tipping point for noncompliance with contact isolation precautions measures.

1 August 2012 in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDror Marchaim
Dror Marchaim
TCTeena Chopra
Teena Chopra
ABAshish Bhargava
Ashish Bhargava
CBChristopher Bogan
Christopher Bogan
SDSorabh Dhar
Sorabh Dhar
KKKeith S. Kaye
Keith S. Kaye
Background.: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are rapidly emerging worldwide. Control group selection is critically important when analyzing predictors of antimicrobial resistance. Focusing on modifiable risk factors can optimize prevention and resource expenditures. To identify specific predictors of CRE, patients with CRE were compared with 3 control groups: (1) patients with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, (2) patients with non-ESBL-containing Enterobacteriaceae, and (3) uninfected controls.Design.: Matched multivariable analyses.Patients and Setting.: Patients possessing CRE that were isolated at Detroit Medical Center from September 1, 2008, to August 31, 2009.Methods.: Patients were matched (1:1 ratio) to the 3 sets of controls. Matching parameters included (1) bacteria type, (2) hospital/ facility, (3) unit/clinic, (4) calendar year, and (5) time at risk (ie, from admission to culture). Matched multivariable analyses were conducted between uninfected controls and patients with CRE, ESBL, and non-ESBL Enterobacteriaceae. Models were also designed comparing patients with CRE to patients with ESBL, patients with non-ESBL Enterobacteriaceae, and all 3 non-CRE groups combined.Results.: Ninety-one unique patients with CRE were identified, and 6 matched models were constructed. Recent (less than 3 months) exposure to antibiotics was the only parameter that was consistently associated with CRE, regardless of the group to which CRE was compared, and was not independently associated with isolation of ESBL or non-ESBL Enterobacteriaceae.Conclusions.: Exposure to antibiotics within 3 months was an independent predictor that characterized patients with CRE isolation. As a result, antimicrobial stewardship efforts need to become a major focus of preventive Interventions. Regulatory focus regarding appropriate antimicrobial use might decrease the detrimental effects of antibiotic misuse and spread of CRE.

1 July 2012 in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTeena Chopra
Teena Chopra
DMDror Marchaim
Dror Marchaim
JVJennifer Veltman
Jennifer Veltman
PJPaul Johnson
Paul Johnson
JZJing J. Zhao
Jing J. Zhao
KKKeith S. Kaye
Keith S. Kaye
Extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing pathogens are associated with extensive morbidity and mortality and rising health care costs. Scant data exist on the impact of antimicrobial therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with ESBL bloodstream infections (BSI), and no large studies have examined the impact of cefepime therapy. A retrospective 3-year study was performed at the Detroit Medical Center on adult patients with BSI due to ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae or Escherichia coli . Data were collected from the medical records of study patients at five hospitals between January 2005 and December 2007. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. One hundred forty-five patients with BSI due to ESBL-producing pathogens, including K. pneumoniae (83%) and E. coli (16.5%), were studied. The mean age of the patients was 66 years. Fifty-one percent of the patients were female, and 79.3% were African-American. Fifty-three patients (37%) died in the hospital, and 92 survived to discharge. In bivariate analysis, the variables associated with mortality ( P < 0.05) were presence of a rapidly fatal condition at the time of admission, use of gentamicin as a consolidative therapeutic agent, and presence of one or more of the following prior to culture date: mechanical ventilation, stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and presence of a central venous catheter. In multivariate analysis, the predictors of in-hospital mortality included stay in the intensive care unit (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 to 4.78), presence of a central-line catheter prior to positive culture (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.77 to 7.03), presence of a rapidly fatal condition at the time of admission (OR, 5.13; 95% CI, 2.13 to 12.39), and recent prior hospitalization (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.83 to 4.09). When carbapenems were added as empirical therapy to the predictor model, there was a trend between empirical carbapenem therapy and decreased mortality (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.50). When added to the model, receipt of empirical cefepime alone ( n = 43) was associated with increased mortality, although this association did not reach statistical significance (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.71 to 3.87). The median length of hospital stay was shorter for patients receiving empirical cefepime than for those receiving empirical or consolidated carbapenem therapy. In multivariate analysis, empirical therapy with cefepime for BSI due to an ESBL-producing pathogen was associated with a trend toward an increased mortality risk and empirical carbapenem therapy was associated with a trend toward decreased mortality risk.

1 April 2014 in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAshish Bhargava
Ashish Bhargava
KHKayoko Hayakawa
Kayoko Hayakawa
ESEthan Silverman
Ethan Silverman
SHSamran Haider
Samran Haider
KAKrishna Chaitanya Alluri
Krishna Chaitanya Alluri
KKKeith S. Kaye
Keith S. Kaye
Background.: This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) colonization among patients screened with rectal cultures upon admission to a hospital or long-term acute care (LTAC) center and to compare risk factors among patients who were screen positive for CRE at the time of hospital admission with those screen positive prior to LTAC admission.Methods.: A retrospective nested matched case-control study was conducted from June 2009 to December 2011. Patients with recent LTAC exposure were screened for CRE carriage at the time of hospital admission, and patients admitted to a regional LTAC facility were screened prior to LTAC admission. Cases were patients with a positive CRE screening culture, and controls (matched in a 3:1 ratio to cases) were patients with negative screening cultures.Results.: Nine hundred five cultures were performed on 679 patients. Forty-eight (7.1%) cases were matched to 144 controls. One hundred fifty-eight patients were screened upon hospital admission and 521 prior to LTAC admission. Independent predictors for CRE colonization included Charlson's score greater than 3 (odds ratio [OR], 4.85 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.64–14.41]), immunosuppression (OR, 3.92 [95% CI, 1.08–1.28]), presence of indwelling devices (OR, 5.21 [95% CI, 1.09–2.96]), and prior antimicrobial exposures (OR, 3.89 [95% CI, 0.71–21.47]). Risk factors among patients screened upon hospital admission were similar to the entire cohort. Among patients screened prior to LTAC admission, the characteristics of the CRE-colonized and noncolonized patients were similar.Conclusions.: These results can be used to identify patients at increased risk for CRE colonization and to help target active surveillance programs in healthcare settings.