Paweł Domżalski

Dr. Paweł Domżalski

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PDPaweł Domżalski
Paweł Domżalski
APAnna Piotrowska
Anna Piotrowska
RTRobert Tuckey
Robert Tuckey
MZMichal Zmijewski
Michal Zmijewski
Despite the recent development of improved methods of treating melanoma such as targeted therapy, immunotherapy or combined treatment, the number of new cases worldwide is increasing. It is well known that active metabolites of vitamin D3 and lumisterol (L3) exert photoprotective and antiproliferative effects on the skin, while UV radiation is a major environmental risk factor for melanoma. Thus, many natural metabolites and synthetic analogs of steroidal and secosteroidal molecules have been tested on various cancer cells and in animal models. In this study, we tested the anti-melanoma properties of several natural derivatives of vitamin D3 and L3 in comparison to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3). A significant decrease in melanoma cell proliferation and cell mobility was observed for selected derivatives, with (25R)-27-hydroxyL3 showing the highest potency (lowest IC50) in A375 cells but lower potency in SK-MEL-28 cells, whereas the parent L3 failed to inhibit proliferation. The efficacy (% inhibition) by 1,24,25(OH)3D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 were similar in both cell types. 1,25(OH)2D3 showed higher potency than 1,24,25(OH)3D3 in SK-MEL-28 cells, but lower potency in A375 cells for the inhibition of proliferation. As for 1,25(OH)2D3, but not the other derivatives tested, treatment of melanoma cells with 1,24,25(OH)3D3 markedly increased the expression of CYP24A1, enhanced translocation of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and also decreased the expression of the proliferation marker Ki67. The effects of the other compounds tested were weaker and occurred only under certain conditions. Our data indicate that 1,24,25(OH)3D3, which has undergone the first step in 1,25(OH)2D3 inactivation by being hydroxylated at C24, still shows anti-melanoma properties, displaying higher potency than 1,25(OH)2D3 in SK-MEL-28 cells. Furthermore, hydroxylation increases the potency of some of the lumisterol hydroxy-derivatives, as in contrast to L3, (25R)-27(OH)L3 effectively inhibits proliferation and migration of the human malignant melanoma cell line A375.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAnna Piotrowska
Anna Piotrowska
JNJoanna I. Nowak
Joanna I. Nowak
JWJustyna Wierzbicka
Justyna Wierzbicka
PDPaweł Domżalski
Paweł Domżalski
MGMonika Górska-Arcisz
Monika Górska-Arcisz
MZMichal Zmijewski
Michal Zmijewski
Regardless of the unprecedented progress in malignant melanoma treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of patients during the last twelve years, this skin cancer remains the most lethal one. We have previously documented that vitamin D and its low-calcaemic analogues enhance the anticancer activity of drugs including a classic chemotherapeutic—dacarbazine—and an antiangiogenic VEGFRs inhibitor—cediranib. In this study, we explored the response of A375 and RPMI7951 melanoma lines to CPL304110 (CPL110), a novel selective inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs), and compared its efficacy with that of AZD4547, the first-generation FGFRs selective inhibitor. We also tested whether 1,25(OH)2D3, the active form of vitamin D, modulates the response of the cells to these drugs. CPL304110 efficiently decreased the viability of melanoma cells in both A375 and RPMI7951 cell lines, with the IC50 value below 1 µM. However, the metastatic RPMI7951 melanoma cells were less sensitive to the tested drug than A375 cells, isolated from primary tumour site. Both tested FGFR inhibitors triggered G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in A375 melanoma cells and increased apoptotic/necrotic SubG1 fraction in RPMI7951 melanoma cells. 1,25(OH)2D3 modulated the efficacy of CPL304110, by decreasing the IC50 value by more than 4-fold in A375 cell line, but not in RPMI7951 cells. Further analysis revealed that both inhibitors impact vitamin D signalling to some extent, and this effect is cell line-specific. On the other hand, 1,25(OH)2D3, have an impact on the expression of FGFR receptors and phosphorylation (FGFR-Tyr653/654). Interestingly, 1,25(OH)2D3 and CPL304110 co-treatment resulted in activation of the ERK1/2 pathway in A375 cells. Our results strongly suggested possible crosstalk between vitamin D-activated pathways and activity of FGFR inhibitors, which should be considered in further clinical studies.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AOAnna M. Olszewska
Anna M. Olszewska
JNJoanna I. Nowak
Joanna I. Nowak
PDPaweł Domżalski
Paweł Domżalski
KMKamil Myszczynski
Kamil Myszczynski
MZMichal Zmijewski
Michal Zmijewski
The active form of vitamin D3, 1,25(OH)2D3, exerts hierarchical control over gene expression, initially targeting transcription factors (TFs) that drive downstream responses. Here, we profile the transcriptional landscape of primary keratinocytes (HPEKp) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cells in response to 1,25(OH)2D3, revealing a distinct shift in regulatory targets. While TFs accounted for 9.23% of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in keratinocytes, this proportion dropped to 4.9% with prolonged exposure. In contrast, SCC cells displayed a five-fold reduction in TFs deregulation and a concurrent enrichment of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which comprised 22.25% of DEGs after 24 h treatment, with 81% upregulated. Integrative transcriptomic and in silico analyses showed that lncRNA induction was predominantly VDR-dependent, partially RXRA-dependent, and PDIA3-independent. Notably, 90% of deregulated lncRNAs were atypical for head and neck SCC. Several of these lncRNAs exhibit potential antitumor properties and may modulate SCC cell responsiveness to interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). In conclusion, these findings suggest that in SCC cells, the regulation of lncRNA expression—rather than transcription factor modulation—may represent a mechanism of the cellular response to 1,25(OH)2D3.