Farhad Mohsenifar

Dr. Farhad Mohsenifar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 January 2016 in Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FMFarhad Mohsenifar
Farhad Mohsenifar
HJhojat jafari
hojat jafari
KSKoray Sayin
Koray Sayin

1 July 2016 in Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HJHojat Jafari
Hojat Jafari
FMFarhad Mohsenifar
Farhad Mohsenifar
KSKoray Sayin
Koray Sayin

1 November 2016 in Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKoray Sayin
Koray Sayin
HJHojat Jafari
Hojat Jafari
FMFarhad Mohsenifar
Farhad Mohsenifar

27 November 2015 in Welding in the World
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AZAli Shojaei Zoeram
Ali Shojaei Zoeram
AZAli Shojaei Zoeram
Ali Shojaei Zoeram
FMFarhad Mohsenifar
Farhad Mohsenifar

1 December 2023 in Journal of the Electrochemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMFarhad Mohsenifar
Farhad Mohsenifar
AIAhmad Irannejad
Ahmad Irannejad
HEHadi Ebrahimifar
Hadi Ebrahimifar
The present study compared the performance of uncoated, Mn-Co and Mn-Co-CeO2-coated Crofer 22 APU ferritic stainless steel interconnects. The samples were oxidized for 500 h in an electric furnace at 800 °C. The surface morphology and phase structure of the samples before and after oxidation were examined using FESEM microscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, respectively. The electrical conductivity evaluation of the samples was also conducted by measuring the area specific resistance (ASR). The results indicated that the weight gain of the uncoated, Mn-Co and Mn-Co-CeO2-coated samples after 500 h of oxidation was 0.55, 0.58 and 0.27 mg.cm−2, respectively. Additionally, a comparison of the oxidation kinetics of the experimental samples revealed that the oxidation rate constant of the Mn-Co-CeO2-coated steel is 10 and 40 times lower than that of the Mn-Co-coated and uncoated steel, respectively. XRD analysis of the samples after oxidation confirmed the presence of MnCo2O4, Co3O4, and (Mn,Cr,Co)3O4 in the oxidized Mn-Co-coated, MnCo2O4, Co3O4, and CeO2 in the oxidized Mn-Co-CeO2-coated, and the chromium-containing phases (FeCr2O4, MnCr2O4, and Cr2O3) in the oxidized uncoated samples. The presence of phases with high electrical conductivity in the oxidized coated samples reduced their activation energy for conduction compared to the oxidized uncoated sample.