Priscila Tiemi Maeda Saito

Dr. Priscila Tiemi Maeda Saito


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 April 2018 in Briefings in Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TNTatianne da Costa Negri
Tatianne da Costa Negri
WAWonder Luz Alves
Wonder Luz Alves
PBPedro Henrique Bugatti
Pedro Henrique Bugatti
PSPriscila Tiemi Maeda Saito
Priscila Tiemi Maeda Saito
DDDouglas Domingues
Douglas Domingues
APAlexandre Paschoal
Alexandre Paschoal
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) correspond to a eukaryotic noncoding RNA class that gained great attention in the past years as a higher layer of regulation for gene expression in cells. There is, however, a lack of specific computational approaches to reliably predict lncRNA in plants, which contrast the variety of prediction tools available for mammalian lncRNAs. This distinction is not that obvious, given that biological features and mechanisms generating lncRNAs in the cell are likely different between animals and plants. Considering this, we present a machine learning analysis and a classifier approach called RNAplonc (https://github.com/TatianneNegri/RNAplonc/) to identify lncRNAs in plants. Our feature selection analysis considered 5468 features, and it used only 16 features to robustly identify lncRNA with the REPTree algorithm. That was the base to create the model and train it with lncRNA and mRNA data from five plant species (thale cress, cucumber, soybean, poplar and Asian rice). After an extensive comparison with other tools largely used in plants (CPC, CPC2, CPAT and PLncPRO), we found that RNAplonc produced more reliable lncRNA predictions from plant transcripts with 87.5% of the best result in eight tests in eight species from the GreeNC database and four independent studies in monocotyledonous (Brachypodium) and eudicotyledonous (Populus and Gossypium) species.

1 November 2015 in Pattern Recognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPriscila Tiemi Maeda Saito
Priscila Tiemi Maeda Saito
CSCelso Suzuki
Celso Suzuki
JGJancarlo F. Gomes
Jancarlo F. Gomes
PRPedro J. de Rezende
Pedro J. de Rezende
AFAlexandre X. Falcão
Alexandre X. Falcão

1 September 2019 in Neurocomputing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRafael S. Bressan
Rafael S. Bressan
PBPedro H. Bugatti
Pedro H. Bugatti
PSPriscila Tiemi Maeda Saito
Priscila Tiemi Maeda Saito

19 August 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGuilherme Camargo
Guilherme Camargo
PBPedro H. Bugatti
Pedro H. Bugatti
PSPriscila Tiemi Maeda Saito
Priscila Tiemi Maeda Saito
Due to datasets have continuously grown, efforts have been performed in the attempt to solve the problem related to the large amount of unlabeled data in disproportion to the scarcity of labeled data. Another important issue is related to the trade-off between the difficulty in obtaining annotations provided by a specialist and the need for a significant amount of annotated data to obtain a robust classifier. In this context, active learning techniques jointly with semi-supervised learning are interesting. A smaller number of more informative samples previously selected (by the active learning strategy) and labeled by a specialist can propagate the labels to a set of unlabeled data (through the semi-supervised one). However, most of the literature works neglect the need for interactive response times that can be required by certain real applications. We propose a more effective and efficient active semi-supervised learning framework, including a new active learning method. An extensive experimental evaluation was performed in the biological context (using the ALL-AML, Escherichia coli and PlantLeaves II datasets), comparing our proposals with state-of-the-art literature works and different supervised (SVM, RF, OPF) and semi-supervised (YATSI-SVM, YATSI-RF and YATSI-OPF) classifiers. From the obtained results, we can observe the benefits of our framework, which allows the classifier to achieve higher accuracies more quickly with a reduced number of annotated samples. Moreover, the selection criterion adopted by our active learning method, based on diversity and uncertainty, enables the prioritization of the most informative boundary samples for the learning process. We obtained a gain of up to 20% against other learning techniques. The active semi-supervised learning approaches presented a better trade-off (accuracies and competitive and viable computational times) when compared with the active supervised learning ones.

13 November 2018 in IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRafael S. Bressan
Rafael S. Bressan
GCGuilherme Camargo
Guilherme Camargo
PBPedro Bugatti
Pedro Bugatti
PSPriscila Tiemi Maeda Saito
Priscila Tiemi Maeda Saito
Nowadays, there is an abundance of biomedical data, such as images and genetic sequences, among others. However, there is a lack of annotation to such volume of data, due to the high costs involved to perform this task. Thus, it is mandatory to develop techniques to ease the burden of human annotation. To reach such goal active learning strategies can be applied. However, the state-of-the-art active learning methods, generally, are not feasible to lead with real-world datasets. Another important issue, that is generally neglected by these methods, is related to the conception that the classifier tends to learn more and more at each iteration. Their adopted selection criteria do not properly exploit the knowledge of the classifier. Therefore, in this paper, we propose the use of an active learning approach, in order to leverage the learning process, including the proposal of a novel active learning strategy. The main difference of our proposed strategy is related to the participation of the classifier in an extremely active way in its learning process. So, we can better maximize and prioritize the knowledge that is obtained by the classifier at each iteration, making use of this knowledge in a more appropriate and useful way when selecting more informative samples. To do so, in our selection criteria, we give significant importance to the classifications suggested by the classifier. In addition, jointly with the participation and the knowledge of the classifier, we consider both uncertainty and representativeness criteria through a fine-grained analysis of the samples. Experimental results show that our novel active learning approach outperforms state-of-the-art active learning methods, considering several supervised classifiers. Hence, dealing with real dataset problems in a better way, equalizing the tradeoff between annotation task and higher accuracy rates.

11 September 2022 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLucas G. Batista
Lucas G. Batista
PBPedro Bugatti
Pedro Bugatti
PSPriscila Tiemi Maeda Saito
Priscila Tiemi Maeda Saito