Background: Noninvasive imaging methods, either anatomical or functional tests, serve as essential instruments for the appropriate management of patients with established or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) plus stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (S-CMR) strategy in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Methods: Patients with suspected CCS showing intermediate coronary plaques (stenosis 30–70%) at CCTA underwent S-CMR. Patients with a positive S-CMR were referred to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) plus instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and myocardial revascularization if recommended. All patients received guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), including high-dose statins, regardless of myocardial revascularization. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization. Results: According to the results of CCTA, 62 patients showing intermediate coronary plaques underwent S-CMR, which was positive for a myocardial perfusion deficit in n = 17 (27%) and negative in n = 45 (73%) patients. According to the results of ICA plus iFR, revascularization was performed in 13 patients. No differences in the primary endpoint between the positive and negative S-CMR groups were observed at 1 year (1 [5.9%] vs. 1 [2.2%], p = 0.485) and after a median of 33.4 months (2 [11.8%] vs. 3 [6.7%]; p = 0.605). Conclusions: Our study suggests that a CCTA plus S-CMR strategy is effective for the evaluation of patients with suspicion of CCS at low–intermediate risk, and it may help to refine the selection of patients with intermediate coronary plaques at CCTA needing coronary revascularization.

Background/Objectives: Over the past two decades, MitraClip™ therapy has proven to be an effective and safe treatment for severe mitral regurgitation (MR), with more than 200,000 patients treated globally through continuous advancements in device design and implantation techniques. This retrospective, observational, single-center study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the latest generation of MitraClip compared to earlier models in the Real-World MitraClip Florence Registry. The primary efficacy endpoint was a comparison in terms of the rate of successful procedures, the time to device deployment and the duration of the hospital stay. The secondary safety endpoint regarded long-term all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. Methods: Patients treated at our center from January 2016 to June 2022 were included. They were divided into two groups: those receiving early-generation devices (G1–G3) and those treated with the last-generation device (G4). All patients underwent a comprehensive preoperative echocardiographic assessment, with a re-evaluation before hospital discharge and after 12 months. A long-term follow-up focusing on all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure was conducted. Results: Of 131 patients, 81 received the last-generation device. The mean age was 79.4 years. Both groups exhibited a high burden of comorbidities (overall mean n = 2.85). Procedural success was high (97%) across groups, with a significantly better MR reduction (Grade ≤ 1) in the G4 group (47% vs. 70%, p = 0.009). The time to device deployment was significantly shorter with the G4 system (72 vs. 135 min, p < 0.001), and there was a trend towards shorter hospital stays (6.1 vs. 7.9 days, p = 0.08). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated better 5-year survival rates for the last-generation device group (p = 0.019), with no significant difference in rehospitalization rates (p = 0.186). Conclusions: The MitraClip G4 system in the real world for the treatment of severe MR is safe and effective, achieving immediate and durable procedural success, accompanied by an improved NYHA functional class. Moreover, a better long-term survival rate was observed, along with a comparable high rate of recurrent HF hospitalization, reflecting a high comorbidity burden in this frail population.