Aldo Vagge

Prof. Dr. Aldo Vagge

Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), Univesity of Genoa, 16126 Genova, GE, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 February 2020 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Claudio IovinoClaudio Iovino
Claudio Iovino
MPMarco Pellegrini
Marco Pellegrini
FBFederico Bernabei
Federico Bernabei
Enrico BorrelliEnrico Borrelli
Enrico Borrelli
RSRiccardo Sacconi
Riccardo Sacconi
Giuseppe GiannaccareGiuseppe Giannaccare
Giuseppe Giannaccare
Remarkable improvements in optical coherence tomography (OCT) technology have resulted in highly sophisticated, noninvasive machines allowing detailed and advanced morphological evaluation of all retinal and choroidal layers. Postproduction semiautomated imaging analysis with dedicated public-domain software allows precise quantitative analysis of binarized OCT images. In this regard, the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) is emerging as a new imaging tool for the measurement and analysis of the choroidal vascular system by quantifying both luminal and stromal choroidal components. Numerous reports have been published so far regarding CVI and its potential applications in healthy eyes as well as in the evaluation and management of several chorioretinal diseases. Current literature suggests that CVI has a lesser variability and is influenced by fewer physiologic factors as compared to choroidal thickness. It can be considered a relatively stable parameter for evaluating the changes in the choroidal vasculature. In this review, the principles and the applications of this advanced imaging modality for studying and understanding the contributing role of choroid in retinal and optic nerve diseases are discussed. Potential advances that may allow the widespread adoption of this tool in the routine clinical practice are also presented.

4 February 2021 in Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMassimo Nicolò
Massimo Nicolò
Lorenzo Ferro DesideriLorenzo Ferro Desideri
Lorenzo Ferro Desideri
AVAldo Vagge
Aldo Vagge
CTCarlo Enrico Traverso
Carlo Enrico Traverso
Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs represent the first-line treatment option for wet age-related macular degeneration (w-AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME); however...

30 March 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMarco Pellegrini
Marco Pellegrini
CSCarlotta Senni
Carlotta Senni
FBFederico Bernabei
Federico Bernabei
Arrigo CiceroArrigo Cicero
Arrigo Cicero
AVAldo Vagge
Aldo Vagge
Giuseppe GiannaccareGiuseppe Giannaccare
Giuseppe Giannaccare
Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface system whose chore mechanisms are tear film instability, inflammation, tear hyperosmolarity and epithelial damage. In recent years, novel therapies specifically targeting inflammation and oxidative stress are being investigated and used in this field. Therefore, an increasing body of evidence supporting the possible role of different micronutrients and nutraceutical products for the treatment of ocular surface diseases is now available. In the present review, we analyzed in detail the effects on ocular surface of omega-3 fatty acids, vitamins A, B12, C, D, selenium, curcumin and flavonoids. Among these, the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in ameliorating DED signs and symptoms is supported by robust scientific evidence. Further long-term clinical trials are warranted to confirm the safety and efficacy of the supplementation of the other micronutrients and nutraceuticals.

22 October 2018 in Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAldo Vagge
Aldo Vagge
Lorenzo Ferro DesideriLorenzo Ferro Desideri
Lorenzo Ferro Desideri
Paolo NucciPaolo Nucci
Paolo Nucci
MSMassimiliano Serafino
Massimiliano Serafino
Giuseppe GiannaccareGiuseppe Giannaccare
Giuseppe Giannaccare
CTCarlo Enrico Traverso
Carlo Enrico Traverso
Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a common condition causing excessive tearing or mucoid discharge from the eyes, due to blockage of the nasolacrimal duct system. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction affects as many as 20% children aged <1 year worldwide and is often resolved without surgery. Available treatment options are conservative therapy, including observation, lacrimal sac massage and antibiotics, and invasive therapy. Observation, combined with conservative options, seems to be the best option in infants aged 1 year, nasolacrimal probing successfully addresses most obstructions. However, the most favorable timing for probing remains controversial. To alleviate persistent epiphora and mucous drainage that is refractory to probing, repeat probing, silicone tube intubation, balloon catheter dilation or dacryocystorhinostomy can be considered as available treatment options. Our review aims to provide an update to CNDO management protocols.

1 November 2020 in Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAldo Vagge
Aldo Vagge
GGGiuseppe Giannaccare
Giuseppe Giannaccare
FSFabio Scarinci
Fabio Scarinci
ACAndrea Cacciamani
Andrea Cacciamani
MPMarco Pellegrini
Marco Pellegrini
DBDonatella Bruzzichessi
Donatella Bruzzichessi
The public health measures imposed in many countries to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak could have negative effects on children's physical and mental health. The authors describe four cases of acquired concomitant acute esotropia likely caused from excessive application of near vision during the COVID-19 lockdown. [ J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus . 2020;57:e88–e91.]

10 June 2020 in British Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGiacomo Savini
Giacomo Savini
MMMarco Di Maita
Marco Di Maita
KHKenneth Joseph Hoffer
Kenneth Joseph Hoffer
KNKristian Næser
Kristian Næser
DSDomenico Schiano-Lomoriello
Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello
CTCarlo E Traverso
Carlo E Traverso
Background/aims To compare the accuracy of 13 formulas for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in cataract surgery. Methods In this retrospective interventional case series, optical biometry measurements were entered into these formulas: Barrett Universal II (BUII) with and without anterior chamber depth (ACD) as a predictor, EVO 2.0 with and without ACD as a predictor, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2AL, Kane, Næser 2, Pearl-DGS, RBF 2.0, SRK/T, T2 and VRF. The mean prediction error (PE), median absolute error (MedAE), mean absolute error and percentage of eyes with a PE within ±0.25, ±0.50, ±0.75 and ±1.00 diopters (D) were calculated. Results Two hundred consecutive eyes were enrolled. With all formulas, the mean PE was zero. The BUII with no ACD had the lowest standard deviation (±0.343 D), followed by the T2 (0.347 D), Kane (0.348 D), EVO 2.0 with no ACD (0.348 D) and BUII with ACD (0.353 D) formulas. The difference among the MedAEs of all formulas was statistically significant (p<0.0001); the lowest values were achieved with the Kane (0.214 D), RBF 2.0 (0.215 D), BUII with and without ACD (0.218 D) and SRK/T (0.223 D). A percentage ranging from 80% to 88.5% of eyes showed a PE within ±0.50 D and all formulas achieved more than 50% of eyes with a PE within ±0.25 D. Conclusion All investigated formulas achieved good results; there was a tendency towards better outcomes with newer formulas. Traditional formulas can still be considered an accurate option.