Background: Heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implementation are effective treatments for advanced heart failure (HF), although their use is limited by organ availability and the high incidence of adverse events. The efficacy of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) as a bridge to transplantation or as a destination therapy in advanced HF is still debated. Methods: A total of 63 patients with INTERMACS class 3 or 4 with contraindications for LVAD and severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) were evaluated for TEER implantation eligibility. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, urgent heart transplantation and LVAD implantation at 12 months. Results: A total of 36 patients underwent TEER, while 27 patients received optimal medical therapy (MT) alone. In the intervention group, 35 patients (97%) were discharged alive. In the MT group, two in-hospital deaths occurred, two patients underwent urgent heart transplantation, and three patients were discharged on inotropes. At the 12-month follow-up, the incidence of the primary endpoint occurring was lower in the TEER group (25% vs. 70%, HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11–0.60, p < 0.01) and the tolerance to neurohormonal therapy was higher (53% vs. 30%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: In advanced HF patients with INTERMACS profile 3 or 4 and severe FMR, TEER on top of optimal MT was associated with a lower incidence of death, urgent heart transplantation or LVAD implantation at 12 months compared to optimal MT alone.
Background/Objectives: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is an established treatment for ADHF. Methods: All consecutive patients admitted to Santa Croce Hospital of Cuneo, receiving CPAP for ADHF in the cath lab during PCI for AMI, were included in a case series. Results: Between December 2018 and March 2021, 25 pts were included (median age 78 yrs, 48% female), with 64% of patients presenting with ST-elevation AMI and 17 (69%) in cardiogenic shock. At admission median left ventricular ejection fraction was 35 (20–60)% and eight (32%) patients had severe mitral regurgitation. Median PaO2/FiO2 was 183 (141–261) mmHg/%, lactate level 2.4 (1.3–3.8) mmol/L, and NTproBNP 7882 (3139–35,000) ng/L. CPAP was positioned and managed by nurses in all cases. Median FiO2 was 50 (35–100)% and median positive end-expiratory pressure was 7.5 (5–12) cmH2O. CPAP was generally well tolerated in 22 (88%) patients. One patient suffered cardiac arrest that led to CPAP interruption due to resuscitation maneuvers. No patient required orotracheal intubation in the cath lab. The post-procedural PaO2/FiO2 ratio substantially improved to 230 (175–356) mmHg/% (p = 0.007) and lactate decreased to 1.5 (1.0–1) mmol/L (p = 0.002). One patient died during hospital stay due to underlying disease, unrelated to the study procedure. Conclusions: CPAP during PCI in patients with AMI and ADHF seems feasible, safe, and well tolerated. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results.
Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is defined as myocardial necrosis caused by an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand in the absence of acute atherothrombotic coronary occlusion/erosion. Unlike type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), T2MI comprises a heterogeneous group of clinical scenarios, often triggered by systemic or cardiac conditions, and it frequently affects elderly patients with a high burden of comorbidities. T2MI often underline multivessel coronary artery disease and, despite its growing clinical relevance, the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to T2MI remains challenging and lacks standardized recommendations. In this review, we present an updated and a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence on the diagnosis and management of T2MI, focusing on the role of coronary angiography and interventional strategies. We discuss the utility of high-sensitivity cardiac biomarkers, imaging modalities, and clinical risk scores to guide patient selection for invasive evaluation. Specific attention is given to conservative and alternative revascularization approaches—including drug-coated balloon angioplasty and stentless percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)—in frail and high-bleeding-risk patients. The review emphasizes the need for individualized decision-making in a population where standard invasive strategies may not always be appropriate, and where a tailored balance between ischemic and hemorrhagic risk is crucial.