Rectus femoris muscle strains are one of the most common injuries occurring in sports such as soccer. The purpose of this study was to describe the safety and feasibility of a combination of percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) and a specific rehab and reconditioning program (RRP) following an injury to the rectus femoris in professional soccer players. Thirteen professional soccer players received PNE treatment 48 h after a grade II rectus femoris muscle injury, followed by a the RRP 24 h later. Assessment of recovery from injury was done by registering the days taken to return to train (RTT), return to play (RTP), and structural and functional progress of the injured muscle was registered through ultrasound imaging and match-GPS parameters. Also, adverse events and reinjuries were recorded in the follow up period of twenty weeks. The RTT registered was 15.62 ± 1.80 days and RTP was 20.15 ± 2.79 days. After fourteen days, the ultrasound image showed optimal repair. Match-GPS parameters were similar before and after injury. There were no relapses nor were any serious adverse effects reported during the 20-week follow-up after the RTP. A combination of PNE and a specific RRP facilitated a faster RTP in previously injured professional soccer players enabling them to sustain performance and avoid reinjuries.

Context: There is limited information on the quantification of external load and reconditioning programs during adductor longus injuries in soccer. Case Presentation: This case report describes a male professional soccer player (LaLiga) returning to performance following an adductor longus muscle injury during the 2022/2023 season. The player suffered the injury during a change of direction in a match. The injury was confirmed by ultrasound after 48 h, and the previously validated rehabilitation and reconditioning program was applied to the injured player. This case report has focused on the development of the on-field reconditioning program and the quantification of the load during this phase. The goal of this case report was to return the player to pre-injury loads using global positioning systems (GPS). Variables such as total distance, distances covered at different speeds and metabolic load variables were quantified during the injury process, with the aim of increasing them through training and reaching at least 75% of the game load. Therefore, objective performance criteria for making return-to-play decisions based on the use of GPS was determined. In addition, the return to play (RTP) was on the 20th day after the injury, and then four RTPs were recorded in the following 6 weeks after the injury occurred, without re-injury. Conclusions: The approach to the competition performance profile, through the quantification of the external load during the rehabilitation process of the injured player, allowed us a safe return to competition and continued competition with a 6-week follow-up.

Background: Neuromuscular training is widely implemented in professional football to enhance performance and reduce injury risk. Although unstable surfaces are commonly used for proprioceptive and rehabilitation purposes, limited evidence supports their effectiveness in improving sport-specific force production and stability in elite athletes. This study aimed to compare the effects of multicomponent neuromuscular training performed on stable versus unstable surfaces on unilateral force production, mobility, and agility in elite male soccer players. Methods: Twenty-seven professional male soccer players from the Spanish first division were randomly assigned to either a stable surface group (SSG; n = 14) or an unstable surface group (USG; n = 13). Both groups completed a 10-week intervention in addition to their regular training routines. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included dorsiflexion range of motion (DFt), Y-Balance Test (YBT), single-leg countermovement jump (SLCMJ), single-leg hop for distance (SLH), side-hop (SH), Speedy Jump (SpJ), Agility T-test (TT), and the Lower Extremity Functional Test (LEFT). A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA and Hedges’ g effect sizes were used for statistical analysis. Results: The SSG showed significant improvements in most performance variables, including DFt, YBT, SLH, SH, SpJ, TT, and LEFT (percent change range: 1.6% to 9.8%; Hedges’ g ranging from 0.52 to 2.57). The USG showed limited improvements, with significant changes only in LEFT (percent change = 1.18%; Hedges’ g = 0.53). Notably, the stable surface group demonstrated enhanced force production and agility, particularly in the non-dominant limb. Conclusions: Multicomponent neuromuscular training on stable surfaces appears more effective than training on unstable surfaces for improving unilateral strength, mobility, and agility in elite soccer players. These findings suggest that stable surface training may provide superior performance benefits and should be considered a priority in high-performance environments.

Return to play (RTP) decision making in professional soccer is crucial for minimising re-injury risk, reducing financial burdens on clubs, and optimising player performance. Despite its significance, there is a lack of objective criteria and consensus on RTP for adductor longus injuries, one of the most common muscle injuries in soccer. The aim of the present consensus was to validate an RTP protocol based on clinical, functional, and performance criteria through expert evaluation. This study hypothesises that a validated RTP protocol for adductor longus injuries will enhance decision making, reduce re-injury rates, and improve player performance upon return. An observational survey was designed to validate an RTP protocol through an expert panel. A total of 63 injury-management professionals (strength and conditioning coaches, physiotherapists, doctors, and rehabilitation fitness coaches) with an average experience of 12.02 ± 6.87 years participated in validating a 20-criteria RTP protocol. The protocol, divided into clinical, functional, and performance criteria, was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Aiken’s V coefficient was calculated for content validity, with criteria validated if Aiken’s V ≥ 0.75. Out of 20 initial RTP criteria, 14 were validated by the expert panel, with Aiken’s V ranging from 0.77 to 0.94 (overall range: 0.61–0.98). Key validated criteria included pain on palpation, flexibility, imaging, athlete feedback, strength assessments, movement quality, pre-injury GPS data, and performance under simulated match conditions. Criteria such as the Copenhagen adduction exercise and specific agility tests were not validated. The expert-validated RTP protocol for adductor longus injuries provides a structured approach to decision making, potentially reducing re-injury risk, improving rehabilitation strategies, and enhancing player performance. These findings could be integrated into clinical sports-medicine practices to enhance rehabilitation effectiveness and RTP decisions in professional soccer.

Context: Adductor longus muscle strains are one of the most common injuries occurring in intermittent sports such as soccer. Objective: The purpose of this study was to know the effect of a specific rehabilitation and reconditioning program, which was previously validated, after adductor longus injury in professional soccer players. Methods: A specific rehabilitation and reconditioning program was applied to 11 injured male professional soccer players. Participants: Eleven male professional soccer players (age = 29.18 [4.45] y; height = 179.64 [4.97] cm; mass = 75.33 [3.84] kg). Interventions: In the first place, the days taken to return to full team training and to return to competition (RTP) was analyzed; second, the most important performance parameters were analyzed and compared in the preinjury match (PRE) and after the return to competition at 2 different points in time (RTP1–RTP2). Results: The return to full team training recorded was 11.91 (1.92) days and the RTP was 15.36 (3.04) days. Match performance parameters showed significant improvements after injury. Significant improvements were observed during RTP2, in the variables of high-speed running (P = .002), very high-speed running (P = .006), acceleration (>3 m/s²; P = .048), and high metabolic load distance (P = .009). Conclusion: The results allow us to conclude that this program was very effective, as it allowed the players to obtain similar and/or higher performance values in a reduced period of time after the injury.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an Athletic Performance Program, performed in addition to teams’ regular training routines, on match performance variables in professional football players. Twenty-nine professional football players (age=27.21±4.95 years; body mass=79.56±5.21 kg) of the Spanish First Division (LaLiga) underwent a 10-week training program focused on the development of mobility, stability, strength, and multidirectional running skills. The APP included 5 indoor sessions per week and on-field micro-dosing stimulus in addition to regular training practices. Match performance variables obtained with GPS devices during official matches and jump performance were measured before and after the APP. The APP increased peak running speed (31.1±1.4 vs 32.1±1.0 km/h, P < 0.001, d=1.88), the number of sprints (0.14±0.03 vs 0.16±0.03 sprint/min, P< 0.001, d=1.44) and the sprint distance (6.45±1.43 vs 8.35±1.22 m/min P< 0.001, d=2.49) during the matches. The intervention also increased countermovement jump height (34.1±2.7vs 35.8±2.5 cm, P< 0.001, d=2.20). The APP was effective to improve intense actions during competitive match play in professional football players. Strength and conditioning coaches may consider the use of multicomponent physical training programs included in the usual training week to enhance players’ match running at high intensity.