Loren Rabinowitz

Loren Rabinowitz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2022 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLoren Rabinowitz
Loren Rabinowitz
NKNikhil A. Kumta
Nikhil A. Kumta
JMJames F. Marion
James F. Marion

18 June 2021 in American Journal of Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLoren Rabinowitz
Loren Rabinowitz
LGLauren Tal Grinspan
Lauren Tal Grinspan
HZHaley M. Zylberberg
Haley M. Zylberberg
RDRebekah Dixon
Rebekah Dixon
YDYakira N. David
Yakira N. David
DGDavid A. Greenwald
David A. Greenwald
INTRODUCTION: Gastroenterologists at all levels of practice benefit from formal mentoring. Much of the current literature on mentoring in gastroenterology is based on expert opinion rather than data. In this study, we aimed to identify gender-related barriers to successful mentoring relationships from the mentor and mentee perspectives. METHODS: A voluntary, web-based survey was distributed to physicians at 20 academic institutions across the United States. Overall, 796 gastroenterology fellows and faculty received the survey link, with 334 physicians responding to the survey (42% response rate), of whom 299 (90%; 129 women and 170 men) completed mentorship questions and were included in analysis. RESULTS: Responses of women and men were compared. Compared with men, more women preferred a mentor of the same gender (38.6% women vs 4.2% men, P < 0.0001) but less often had one (45.5% vs 70.2%, P < 0.0001). Women also reported having more difficulty finding a mentor (44.4% vs 16.0%, P < 0.0001) and more often cited inability to identify a mentor of the same gender as a contributing factor (12.8% vs 0.9%, P = 0.0004). More women mentors felt comfortable advising women mentees about work-life balance (88.3% vs 63.8%, P = 0.0005). Nonetheless, fewer women considered themselves effective mentors (33.3% vs 52.6%, P = 0.03). More women reported feeling pressured to mentor because of their gender (39.5% vs 0.9% of men, P < 0.0001). Despite no gender differences, one-third of respondents reported negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their ability to mentor and be mentored. DISCUSSION: Inequities exist in the experiences of women mentees and mentors in gastroenterology, which may affect career advancement and job satisfaction.

1 May 2021 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLoren Rabinowitz
Loren Rabinowitz
LGLauren Tal Grinspan
Lauren Tal Grinspan
KWKevin E. Williams
Kevin E. Williams
HZHaley M. Zylberberg
Haley M. Zylberberg
YDYakira David
Yakira David
MKMichelle Kang Kim
Michelle Kang Kim

14 June 2018 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LRLoren Rabinowitz
Loren Rabinowitz
As the senior resident in an intensive care unit (ICU), I had just finished a particularly difficult discussion with a patient’s family. My patient was an elderly man with advanced dementia and a weak heart who had collapsed at home. Now that he was ventilator-dependent and showing no signs of meaningful neurologic function, his wife asked that he not undergo cardiac resuscitation if his heart were to stop beating.

6 September 2019 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ACAustin Lee Chiang
Austin Lee Chiang
LRLoren Rabinowitz
Loren Rabinowitz
AKAkhil Kumar
Akhil Kumar
WCWalter Wai-Yip Chan
Walter Wai-Yip Chan
Background: Patients often look to social media as an important tool to gather information about institutions and professionals. Since 1990, United States News and World Report (USNWR) has published annual rankings of hospitals and subspecialty divisions. It remains unknown if social media presence is associated with the USNWR gastroenterology and gastrointestinal (GI) surgery divisional rankings, or how changes in online presence over time affects division ranking. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine if social media presence is associated with USNWR gastroenterology and GI surgery divisional rankings and to ascertain how changes in online presence over time affect division rankings. Methods: Social media presence among the top 30 institutions listed in the 2014 USNWR gastroenterology and GI surgery divisional rankings were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficients and multivariate analysis, controlling for covariates. Linear and logistic regression using data from 2014 and 2016 USNWR rankings were then used to assess the association between institutional ranking or reputation score with any potential changes in numbers of followers over time. Sensitivity analysis was performed by assessing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to determine the follower threshold associated with improved or maintained ranking, which was done by dichotomizing changes in followers at values between the 7000 and 12,000 follower mark. Results: Twitter follower count was an independent predictor of divisional ranking (β=.00004; P<.001) and reputation score (β=–.00002; P=.03) in 2014. Academic affiliation also independently predicted USNWR division ranking (β=5.3; P=.04) and reputation score (β=–7.3; P=.03). Between 2014 and 2016, Twitter followers remained significantly associated with improved or maintained rankings (OR 14.63; 95% CI 1.08-197.81; P=.04). On sensitivity analysis, an 8000 person increase in Twitter followers significantly predicted improved or maintained rankings compared to other cutoffs. Conclusions: Institutional social media presence is independently associated with USNWR divisional ranking and reputation score. Improvement in social media following was also independently associated with improved or maintained divisional ranking and reputation score, with a threshold of 8000 additional followers as the best predictor of improved or stable ranking.

11 March 2022 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LRLoren Rabinowitz
Loren Rabinowitz
DRDanielle G. Rabinowitz
Danielle G. Rabinowitz
ESEmily M. Silver
Emily M. Silver
AOAmy S. Oxentenko
Amy S. Oxentenko
KWKevin E. Williams
Kevin E. Williams
JSJulie K. Silver
Julie K. Silver