Uncontrolled chronic inflammation results in cardiovascular disease and early death. In this review, we studied the impact of rheumatoid arthritis on the cardiovascular system, including the early and accelerated development of atherosclerosis and its clinical manifestations, focusing on the inflammatory mechanisms leading to arterial wall damage, rapid atherosclerotic plaque formation, and thrombosis. Furthermore, the effect of medications used to treat rheumatoid arthritis on the cardiovascular system was studied. The effect of chronic inflammation and medication on traditional cardiovascular risk factors is not the main subject of this review. We observed that uncontrolled chronic inflammation and some medications directly impact all the stages of atherosclerosis. In conclusion, reducing inflammation and maintaining long-term remission in rheumatoid arthritis may prevent early atherosclerosis. We believe that this review will encourage a better interdisciplinary approach to the management of these patients and further research in this field.

Background and Objectives: There is an increasing interest in the coronary tortuosity as a novel pathophysiological mechanism of ischemia in coronary artery disease without significant obstruction, but there are a lack of studies to confirm this relationship in the clinical setting. The aim of our study was to evaluate the association of severe coronary tortuosity and the potential role of coronary blood supply dominance in the appearance of myocardial ischemia in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (non-CAD), compared to patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Materials and Methods: The study enrolled 131 participants (71 male and 60 female), recruited among patients referred to cardiologists due to angina symptoms with ischemic alterations established by cardiac stress tests, as well as those admitted to the hospital for acute coronary syndrome. Results: Mean age of recruited patients was 61.6 (±10.1) years. According to the coronary angiography, they were divided into two groups: non-obstructive and obstructive CAD (77 and 54, respectively). There were significantly more women (61% vs. 24%, p < 0.001) in the non-CAD group. Both tortuous coronary arteries (50.6% vs. 14.8%, p < 0.001) and left coronary dominance (37.7% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.006) were more frequent in the non-CAD group compared to the CAD group. Female sex (OR = 17.516, p = 0.001), tortuous coronary arteries (OR = 7.962, p = 0.006) and left dominance of blood supply were significant predictors for non-CAD. Conclusions: Non-obstructive CAD is common among patients, especially women, who are referred for coronary angiography. Severe coronary artery tortuosity is the strongest independent predictor of non-obstructive CAD, followed by female gender and left coronary dominance.

Coronary tortuosity has been recognized as a potential pathophysiological mechanism in the development of non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to examine the role of two coronary tortuosity measurement methods in the detection of clinically significant coronary tortuosity. The study included 160 patients with angina symptoms and myocardial ischemia detected by cardiac stress tests in chronic settings and those diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome. After coronary angiography, tortuosity of coronary arteries was assessed by two methods, including measurement of tortuosity angles and calculating of tortuosity index. Significantly more tortuous coronary arteries were detected in the group with non-obstructive CAD (p < 0.01 for all three arteries), with significantly higher tortuosity index (TI) for all three coronary arteries in this group of patients, compared to patients with obstructive CAD. The highest TI for LCX was found in patients with lateral ischemia (p < 0.001) and for LAD in patients with anterior ischemia (p < 0.001). When measured by the angle method, the only association was found between LCX tortuosity and lateral ischemia (OR 4.9, p = 0.046). In conclusion, coronary tortuosity represents a pathophysiological mechanism for myocardial ischemia in non-obstructive CAD. The coronary tortuosity index could be a reliable and widely applicable tool for the quantification of coronary tortuosity.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) increases the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, including a 50–60% increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Arterial hypertension (HT) is considered the major contributing risk factor for CVD development in RA patients. In this investigation, we compared the incidence and prevalence of HT between RA and osteoarthritis (OA) and the influence of HT on CVD development in CVD-naive patients in both groups. This was a prospective clinical cohort investigation with an 8-year follow-up period. A total of 201 participants, 124 with RA (investigation group) and 77 with OA (control group), without diagnosed CVD or symptomatic heart failure were included. After selection according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, both groups underwent initial and final visits, and the investigation group underwent annual visits to assess disease activity. Case report forms were completed for each visit. The obtained data were analyzed by a statistician. No difference in the incidence or prevalence of HT was found between the investigation and control groups. No difference in the prevalence of HT was reported between the study groups and age-standardized data from the general population. The investigation group had a higher incidence of CVD than the control group. RA participants with long-term remission had a marginally lower HT prevalence. Although previous studies reported a higher HT prevalence in RA than in OA and the general population, our findings did not support this. The RA group had a higher incidence of CVD, but it is possible that optimal disease control with long-term remission could reduce HT incidence and prevalence while also having beneficial effects on other cardiovascular risk factors (CV) and, consequently, CVD occurrence.

Planning and guiding PCI in a complex intervention is very important and one of the most important decisions is the one on whether to use one or two stent bifurcation techniques. Unfortunately, this can easily turn into complication and the need to...