Renal dysfunction following cardiac surgery is more apparent in high-risk patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction, diabetes and impaired left-ventricular function, and following complicated procedures involving prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The aim of this prospectively randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled study was to evaluate reno-protective effect of low-dose furosemide infusion in this high-risk group. Patients with preoperative serum creatinine >130 micromol/l (1.4 mg/dl), left-ventricular ejection fraction 50% increase in serum creatinine postoperatively, or >130 micromol/l (1.4 mg/dl), or requirement for haemodialysis, or all of these. In patients with preoperative serum creatinine >130 micromol/l, >50% increase over preoperative levels was used to define postoperative renal dysfunction. Following cardiac surgery, patients receiving furosemide had a higher urine output (3.4+/-1.2 ml/kg/h in furosemide group and 1.2+/-0.5 ml/kg/h in placebo group; p<0.001), higher postoperative fluid requirement (4631+/-1359 ml in furosemide group and 3714+/-807 ml in placebo group, p=0.011), and lower urinary-creatinine (2+/-1.3 micromol/l in furosemide group and 5.9+/-2.5 micromol/l in placebo group p<0.001). Both groups had significant increase in retinol binding protein/creatinine ratio (7.2+/-6 to 3152+/-1411 in furosemide group; 4.9+/-2.1 to 2809+/-1125 in placebo group; p<0.001) and peak serum creatinine (98+/-33 to 177+/-123 micromol/l in furosemide group; 96+/-20 to 143+/-87 micromol/l in placebo group; p<0.001), and a significant decrease in peak creatinine-clearance (64.3+/-29.4 to 39.1+/-16.6 ml/min in furosemide group; 65.5+/-38.6 to 41.8+/-17.8 ml/min in placebo group; p<0.001) following cardiac surgery, implying significant renal injury following cardiac surgery. Peak creatinine levels (177+/-123 micromol/l in furosemide group and 143+/-87 micromol/l in placebo group; p=0.35) and peak creatinine-clearance (39.1+/-16.6 ml/min in furosemide group and 41.8+/-17.8 ml/min in placebo group; p=0.61) were similar in the two groups. Importantly, there was no difference in incidence of renal dysfunction between the furosemide group (9/21) and the control group (8/21) (relative risk 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.6-2.2; p=0.99). Our randomised trial did not demonstrate any benefit of furosemide-infusion postoperatively in high-risk cardiac surgical patients. Although urinary output increased with furosemide, there was no decrease in renal injury, and no decrease in incidence of renal dysfunction.

Objectives: Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock is an infrequent but important cause of death following cardiac surgery. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation offers the opportunity for temporary cardiovascular support and myocardial rest, with a view to recovery. We examine our results with our recently-implemented management algorithm. Methods: We report our series of 15 consecutive patients out of 357 patients [4.2%] who required institution of veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation system support as treatment for Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in the current era [January-2017 to January-2020]. Results: The mean age was 64.3 ± 11.6 years (range: 40–82 years); there were 13 males (86.7%). Duration of veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation support was 6.7 ± 1.9 days. Duration of stay on intensive care unit [ICU] was 18.9 ± 17.1 days. Duration of hospital-stay was 28.3 ± 20.8 days. Survival to discharge and at 2.2 ± 0.9 years was 67%. Conclusions: We have shown clearly that veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation is an important rescue option for patients who develop refractory post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock, with improved survival of 67% at 2.2 ± 0.9 years in those placed on post-cardiotomy veno-arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation support, which is superior to that reported hitherto in literature. We have sought to highlight the successes of post cardiotomy veno-arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation support, with improved results, based on careful patient selection, as well as diligent management of these critically-ill patients in the postoperative period, prior to establishment of irreversible end-organ dysfunction. Our strategy has also helped us rationalize and optimize the use of this expensive treatment modality.

Background/Objectives: Mental health and substance use disorders (MHDs and SUDs) affect cardiac allograft and VAD recipients and impact their quality of life and compliance. Limited research currently exists on MHDs and SUDs in this population. Methods: This study compares the incidence of MHDs and SUDs in the transplant list, VAD, and post-transplant patients with that in heart failure patients. Study cohorts were derived from the TriNetX database using ICD-10 codes. Differences in incidence were examined using the log-rank test. Adults with MHDs and SUDs before the window of time were excluded. All comparisons were made between propensity-matched cohorts. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Transplant waitlist patients showed a significant increase in the incidence of anxiety, depression, panic, adjustment, mood, alcohol use, and eating disorders. Post-transplant patients showed a significant increase in depression and opioid use. VAD patients showed a significant increase in depression and a decrease in panic disorder and anxiety. These results allow for further investigations on prevention and coping strategies. Conclusions: The deterioration of mental health can significantly impact medication compliance, survival, and quality of life. Opioid use for pain management in the early postoperative period should be further investigated to assess its impact on long-term substance use and addiction.

Cardiac injuries after penetrating chest trauma are uncommon but potentially life threatening; these injuries can remain occult during the early stage because of the cardiac reserve of youthful physiology and may present at a later stage as the initial damage progresses or compensatory mechanisms fail. We report a case of unusual penetrating cardiac trauma from a posterior intercostal stab wound that affected both the interatrial septum and the tricuspid valve, leading to a stormy presentation as a result of the development of an acute right-to-left shunt followed by a successful surgical repair.

Objectives: Patients in cardiogenic shock (CS) may be successfully bridged using intravascular micro-axial left ventricular assist devices (M-LVADs) for recovery or determination of definitive therapy. Methods: One hundred and seven CS patients implanted with M-LVADs from January 2020 to May 2024 were divided into four groups; group-1: 34 patients (transplant); group-2: 25 patients (LVAD); group-3: 42 patients (postcardiotomy CS (PCCS)); group-4: 6 patients (decision/recovery but excluded from analysis). Multivariable logistic regression and Multivariable Coxregression models identified predictors of early -hospital and late mortality, and Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with p < 0.05, respectively, were considered statistically significant. SPSS 29.0 and Python 3.11.1. were used for analyses. Results: Complications included device-malfunction (6%), gastrointestinal bleed (9%), long-term hemodialysis (21%), axillary hematoma requiring re-exploration (10%), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (4%) requiring heparin therapy cessation/initiation of argatroban infusion, and non-fatal stroke (11%). Early hospital mortality included 13 patients: 2 in group-1, 1 in group-2, 10 in group-3 (p = 0.02). In the Logistic-Regression model, category of CS requiring an M-LVAD was significant (OR = 4.7, p = 0.05). Patients were followed for 4.5 years (mean follow-up was 23 ± 17 months), and 23 deaths occurred; group-1: 3 patients, group-2: 5 patients, and group-3: 15 patients (p = 0.019). At 4.5 years, actuarial survival was 90.7 ± 5.1% in group-1, 79.2 ± 8.3% in group-2, 62.8 ± 7.7% in group-3 (p = 0.01). In the Cox-Regression model, M-LVAD category (HR = 3.63, p = 0.04), and long-term postoperative dialysis (HR = 3.9, p = 0.002) emerged as predictors of long-term mortality. Conclusions: In cardiogenic shock, mid-term outcomes demonstrate good survival with M-LVADs as bridge to transplant/durable LVADs and reasonable survival with M-LVADs as a bridge to recovery following cardiotomy, accompanied by reduced ECMO usage, and early ambulation/rehabilitation.

Cardiogenic shock can be defined as a state of circulatory collapse resulting in hypoperfusion and end-organ dysfunction. It carries a large burden of mortality, but management strategies are driven by expert consensus rather than adequately powered randomized clinical trials. The goal of this review is to highlight the differences in presentation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock depending on the etiology, such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) versus acute-on-chronic heart failure (HF), gender-based differences in treatment strategies and outcomes and the need for more precise risk stratification and modeling to improve the efficiency of treatment delivery in a personalized fashion. PubMed and Google Scholar were used to search the literature for this qualitative review. The differences in gender and etiology of cardiogenic shock are not consistent in all studies in the exiting literature. There is a need for identification of novel risk factors that define the different phenotypes that present with similar hemodynamic and biomarker profiles. There is an urgent need to devise a methodology to understand and differentiate the different cardiogenic shock phenotypes and their trajectories. Better risk prediction models should be generated to help deliver well-tailored treatment, paving the way to the efficient delivery of personalized medicine.