Background: Migraine is a common neurological condition marked by unilateral recurrent pulsating headaches, often associated with systemic signs and symptoms. Recently, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists, including atogepant, an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, have emerged as effective and safe treatments. The current study sought to assess the efficacy and safety of atogepant for preventing episodic migraines in adults. Methods: A comprehensive search, following PRISMA guidelines, was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials published up to June 2024. Results: The studies included adult participants with episodic migraine treated with atogepant. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs) and monthly headache days (MHDs) over 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included reduction in acute medication use, 50% responder rates, and adverse events. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety. Six trials with 4569 participants were included. Atogepant significantly reduced mean monthly migraine days (MMDs) and monthly headache days (MHDs) compared to placebo at all doses (10 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg), with the 60 mg dose showing the greatest reduction (mean difference: −1.48 days, p < 0.001). Significant reductions in acute medication use and improved 50% responder rates were also observed for all doses. The safety profile of atogepant was favorable, with common adverse events being mild to moderate, such as constipation and nausea. There were no significant differences in serious adverse events between the atogepant and placebo groups. Conclusions: Atogepant is an effective and well-tolerated option for preventing episodic migraines, showing significant reductions in migraine frequency and acute medication use. However, further studies are necessary to assess its long-term safety and efficacy, especially at higher doses, and to investigate its potential role in personalized treatment strategies for migraine prevention.

Background: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder that worsens over time without appropriate treatment. Although referral to a speech and language pathologist is essential for diagnosing language deficits and developing effective treatment plans, there is no scientific consensus regarding the most effective treatment. Thus, our study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of various therapeutic interventions for PPA. Methods: Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify articles assessing different therapeutic interventions for PPA. To ensure comprehensive coverage, the search strategy employed specific medical subject headings. The primary outcome measure was language gain; the secondary outcome assessed overall therapeutic effects. Data on study characteristics, patient demographics, PPA subtypes, therapeutic modalities, and treatment patterns were collected. Results: Fifty-seven studies with 655 patients were included. For naming and word finding, errorless learning therapy, lexical retrieval cascade (LRC), semantic feature training, smartphone-based cognitive therapy, picture-naming therapy, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) maintained effects for up to six months. Repetitive rTMS, video-implemented script training for aphasia (VISTA), and structured oral reading therapy improved speech fluency. Sole transcranial treatments enhanced auditory verbal comprehension, whereas transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with language or cognitive therapy improved repetition abilities. Phonological and orthographic treatments improved reading accuracy across PPA subtypes. tDCS combined with speech therapy enhanced mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores and cognitive function. Several therapies, including smartphone-based cognitive therapy and VISTA therapy, demonstrated sustained language improvements over six months. Conclusions: Various therapeutic interventions offer potential benefits for individuals with PPA. However, due to the heterogeneity in study designs, administration methods, small sample sizes, and lack of standardized measurement methods, drawing a firm conclusion is difficult. Further studies are warranted to establish evidence-based treatment protocols.