Zusammenfassung: Hintergrund: Die Corona-Pandemie stellt Krankenhäuser vor enorme finanzielle Herausforderungen. Am Beispiel einer Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie soll die Leistungsentwicklung in der stationären Versorgung der ersten 5 Wochen nach Beginn der gesetzgeberisch angeordneten Leistungsreduktion im Vorjahresvergleich sowie eine Bewertung der gesetzgeberisch festgelegten Kompensationsmaßnahmen bewertet werden. Methodik: Anhand der Leistungszahlen wird ein Vergleich des Zeitraumes 16.03. bis 17.04.2019 und demselben Zeitraum 2020 durchgeführt. Veränderungen von Fallzahl, Casemix, Casemix-Index und Daymix-Index sowie den Belegungstagen werden erfasst. Auf diese Veränderungen werden die monetären Maßnahmen aus dem COVID-19-Krankenhausentlastungsgesetz angewendet und deren Auskömmlichkeit bewertet. Ergebnisse: Im Vergleich zum Vorjahr kommt es im Beobachtungszeitraum zu einem Rückgang der stationären Aufnahmen von 307 Patienten. Demzufolge waren ein Rückgang des Casemix um 595 Punkte und der Belegungstage um 2320 Tage zu verzeichnen. Es ergibt sich ein Erlösrückgang von ca. 1,9 Mio. EUR. Die Leerbettenpauschale stellt die monetär größte Kompensation der Erlösausfälle dar. Sie beläuft sich auf ca. 1,3 Mio. EUR. Unter Berücksichtigung weiterer Unterstützung und einer Bereinigung um variable Kosten bleibt ein Fehlbetrag von 382.069 € in Bezug auf die stationären Leistungen für 5 Wochen. Diskussion: Die Maßnahmen des Gesetzgebers stellen eine wichtige Stütze zur wirtschaftlichen Absicherung deutscher Krankenhäuser dar. Die fehlende Differenzierung der Maßnahmen nach Fachrichtung führt für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie zu einer nur unzureichenden Kompensation.

Accuracy evaluation of navigated image free placement of double cortical fixation buttons for coracoclavicular tunnel position in comparison to conventional drill guide based placement. Twenty-six patients with acute acromioclavicular joint instability were included in this non-randomized cohort study. All patients were treated with a Double- TightRope technique. In 13 cases the conventional drill guide based placement was used (group 1). In 13 patients surgery was performed as a navigated procedure with a fluoro-free optoelectronic system (group 2). The number of coracoclavicular drillings per patient (First pass accuracy; FPA (%)) was documented, the subcoracoidal position of the fixation buttons has been evaluated and graded as “intended position achieved (IPA)” or “intended position not achieved (IPnA)”. In group 1 drilling had to be repeated in four patients (30.8 %) to achieve proper placement of the subcoracoidal fixation buttons. 100 % first pass accuracy was observed in group 2 (p = 0.03). In group 1, the intended position of the subcoracoid buttons was not achieved (IPnA) in six patients (46.2 %). In group 2 all intended positions were achieved (p = 0.005). Arthroscopic controlled fluoro-free navigated coracoclavicular drilling for the repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocation has higher first pass accuracy in comparison to conventional drill guide based placement. Therefore the navigation enables a precise position of the drill holes, may reduce the risk of an iatrogenic coracoid fracture and migration of fixation devices. Local institutional review board No. 061-14-10032014

The healthcare system has been placed under an enormous burden by the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. In addition to the challenge of providing sufficient care for COVID-19 patients, there is also a need to ensure adequate care for non-COVID-19 patients. We investigated neurosurgical care in a university hospital during the pandemic. We examined the second wave of the pandemic from 1 October 2020 to 15 March 2021 in this retrospective single-center study and compared it to a pre-pandemic period from 1 October 2019 to 15 March 2020. Any neurosurgical intervention, along with patient- and treatment-dependent factors, were recorded. We also examined perioperative complications and unplanned readmissions. A statistical comparison of the study groups was performed. We treated 535 patients with a total of 602 neurosurgical surgeries during the pandemic. This compares to 602 patients with 717 surgeries during the pre-pandemic period. There were 67 fewer patients (reduction to 88.87%) admitted and 115 fewer surgeries (reduction to 83.96%) performed, which were essentially highly elective procedures, such as cervical spinal stenosis, intracranial neurinomas, and peripheral nerve lesions. Regarding complication rates and unplanned readmissions, there was no significant difference between the COVID-19 pandemic and the non-pandemic patient group. Operative capacities were slightly reduced to 88% due to the pandemic. Nevertheless, comprehensive emergency and elective care was guaranteed in our university hospital. This speaks for the sufficient resources and high-quality processes that existed even before the pandemic.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Central COVID-19 Coordination Centers (CCCCs) have been established at several hospitals across Germany with the intention to assist local health care professionals in efficiently referring patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection to regional hospitals and therefore to prevent the collapse of local health system structures. In addition, these centers coordinate interhospital transfers of patients with COVID-19 and provide or arrange specialized telemedical consultations. Objective: This study describes the establishment and management of a CCCC at a German university hospital. Methods: We performed economic analyses (cost, cost-effectiveness, use, and utility) according to the CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) criteria. Additionally, we conducted a systematic review to identify publications on similar institutions worldwide. The 2 months with the highest local incidence of COVID-19 cases (December 2020 and January 2021) were considered. Results: During this time, 17.3 requests per day were made to the CCCC regarding admission or transfer of patients with COVID-19. The majority of requests were made by emergency medical services (601/1068, 56.3%), patients with an average age of 71.8 (SD 17.2) years were involved, and for 737 of 1068 cases (69%), SARS-CoV-2 had already been detected by a positive polymerase chain reaction test. In 59.8% (639/1068) of the concerned patients, further treatment by a general practitioner or outpatient presentation in a hospital could be initiated after appropriate advice, 27.2% (291/1068) of patients were admitted to normal wards, and 12.9% (138/1068) were directly transmitted to an intensive care unit. The operating costs of the CCCC amounted to more than €52,000 (US $60,031) per month. Of the 334 patients with detected SARS-CoV-2 who were referred via EMS or outpatient physicians, 302 (90.4%) were triaged and announced in advance by the CCCC. No other published economic analysis of COVID-19 coordination or management institutions at hospitals could be found. Conclusions: Despite the high cost of the CCCC, we were able to show that it is a beneficial concept to both the providing hospital and the public health system. However, the most important benefits of the CCCC are that it prevents hospitals from being overrun by patients and that it avoids situations in which physicians must weigh one patient’s life against another’s.