Sapha Barkati

Dr. Sapha Barkati

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2023 in Annals of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ralph HuitsRalph Huits
Ralph Huits
KAKristina M. Angelo
Kristina M. Angelo
BABhawana Amatya
Bhawana Amatya
SBSapha Barkati
Sapha Barkati
EBElizabeth D. Barnett
Elizabeth D. Barnett
ESEli Schwartz
Eli Schwartz
Dengue virus is a flavivirus transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes and is an important cause of illness worldwide. Data on the severity of travel-associated dengue illness are limited. To describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes among international travelers with severe dengue or dengue with warning signs as defined by the 2009 World Health Organization classification (that is, complicated dengue). Retrospective chart review and analysis of travelers with complicated dengue reported to GeoSentinel from January 2007 through July 2022. 20 of 71 international GeoSentinel sites. Returning travelers with complicated dengue. Routinely collected surveillance data plus chart review with abstraction of clinical information using predefined grading criteria to characterize the manifestations of complicated dengue. Of 5958 patients with dengue, 95 (2%) had complicated dengue. Eighty-six (91%) patients had a supplemental questionnaire completed. Eighty-five of 86 (99%) patients had warning signs, and 27 (31%) were classified as severe. Median age was 34 years (range, 8 to 91 years); 48 (56%) were female. Patients acquired dengue most frequently in the Caribbean (n = 27 [31%]) and Southeast Asia (n = 21 [24%]). Frequent reasons for travel were tourism (46%) and visiting friends and relatives (32%). Twenty-one of 84 (25%) patients had comorbidities. Seventy-eight (91%) patients were hospitalized. One patient died of nondengue-related illnesses. Common laboratory findings and signs were thrombocytopenia (78%), elevated aminotransferase (62%), bleeding (52%), and plasma leakage (20%). Among severe cases, ophthalmologic pathology (n = 3), severe liver disease (n = 3), myocarditis (n = 2), and neurologic symptoms (n = 2) were reported. Of 44 patients with serologic data, 32 confirmed cases were classified as primary dengue (IgM+/IgG-) and 12 as secondary (IgM-/IgG+) dengue. Data for some variables could not be retrieved by chart review for some patients. The generalizability of our observations may be limited. Complicated dengue is relatively rare in travelers. Clinicians should monitor patients with dengue closely for warning signs that may indicate progression to severe disease. Risk factors for developing complications of dengue in travelers need further prospective study. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, International Society of Travel Medicine, Public Health Agency of Canada, and GeoSentinel Foundation.

1 January 2023 in Annals of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LHLuke B. Harrison
Luke B. Harrison
GBGeneviève Bergeron
Geneviève Bergeron
GCGeneviève Cadieux
Geneviève Cadieux
HCHugues Charest
Hugues Charest
JFJudith Fafard
Judith Fafard
SBSapha Barkati
Sapha Barkati
A global outbreak of monkeypox occurred beginning in mid-2022 outside of endemic areas. This report characterizes the outbreak of monkeypox in Montréal, the first large outbreak in North America, u... Visual Monkeypox in Montréal. A global outbreak of monkeypox occurred beginning in mid-2022 outside of endemic areas. This report characterizes the outbreak of monkeypox in Montréal, the f... Background: Monkeypox, a viral zoonotic disease, is causing a global outbreak outside of endemic areas. Objective: To characterize the outbreak of monkeypox in Montréal, the first large outbreak in...

1 July 2023 in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJeffrey Chivinski
Jeffrey Chivinski
KNKeren Nathan
Keren Nathan
FNFaheel Naeem
Faheel Naeem
TETaline Ekmekjian
Taline Ekmekjian
Michael LibmanMichael Libman
Michael Libman
SBSapha Barkati
Sapha Barkati
Background: Tegumentary leishmaniasis is often subject to limited funding, underpowered studies, and a paucity of high-quality interventional studies. Intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) has been increasingly used to treat cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis (CL and ML, respectively) despite the lack of well-conducted interventional studies. We conducted a systematic review to consolidate the descriptive evidence on the efficacy and safety of L-AmB in treating CL and ML. Methods: Several online databases and the reference lists of included studies were searched to extract data from 132 studies comprising both case reports and case series. The population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design strategy and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used. Results: Of 132 studies included, 92 were case reports and 40 were case series. Of the 92 cases, 65 (82.3%) were considered cured after receiving L-AmB as part of their treatment regimen. Twenty-one of the 92 (22.8%) cases reported adverse reactions to L-AmB. A pooled cure rate of 87.0% (95% CI, 79.0%–92.0%) was reported for the 38 case series that reported on treatment efficacy; 40.7% of the cases were associated with an adverse reaction. Conclusions: Observational data on cure rates using L-AmB suggest efficacy between 80% and 90%, similar to rates reported for other antileishmanial drugs. The highest efficacy rates were observed when a single cycle of L-AmB was administered to patients with mild–moderate CL and ML. The limitations of this study include the heterogeneity observed among the included studies and the increased likelihood of publication bias associated with the inclusion of case reports and case series. This systematic review further illustrates the need for high-quality comparative trials of intravenous L-AmB for the treatment of tegumentary leishmaniasis.

21 June 2022 in CMAJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAlexandre Lemieux
Alexandre Lemieux
FLFrançois Lagacé
François Lagacé
KBKendall Billick
Kendall Billick
MNMomar Ndao
Momar Ndao
CYCédric P. Yansouni
Cédric P. Yansouni
SBSapha Barkati
Sapha Barkati
Background: Cutaneous leishmaniasis is increasingly encountered in returned travellers and migrants to nonendemic countries. We sought to describe the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosed at our reference centre over a 10-year period. Methods: This case series included all laboratory-confirmed cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis in travellers and migrants for whom complete clinical data were available, diagnosed between January 2008 and October 2018 at the J.D. MacLean Centre for Tropical Diseases in Montréal. We examined the number of cases each year. We used descriptive statistics to summarize variables (e.g., demographic characteristics, travel history, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, treatments, adverse events) extracted from the patients’ electronic medical records. The primary outcome for evaluating clinical response to treatment was defined as the complete re-epithelialization of the wound surface at 1 year. Results: We identified 48 patients who received diagnoses of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the 10-year study period, including 33 exposed in the Americas and 15 exposed in other regions (median age 43.5 [range 1–75] yr); 28 [58%] males). The annual number of cases increased from 9 in 2008/09 to 16 in 2017/18. The median time from onset to diagnosis was 89 (IQR 58–134) days. Liposomal amphotericin B was the most commonly used initial treatment (20 [53%] patients). Thirty-five patients completed their follow-up, and 11 had successful response to 1 course of liposomal amphotericin B. Adverse events (including acute kidney injury, increased pancreatic enzymes and fatigue) were reported in 6 (30%) patients. Clinical cure was achieved within 1 year for 32 (91%) of the 35 patients who completed follow-up. Interpretation: This study showed an increase in the number of cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis seen in our centre over the study period, likely because of increased travel and migration. This diagnosis should be considered in travellers and migrants with a chronic cutaneous lesion.

27 December 2022 in Journal of Travel Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMarta Díaz-Menéndez
Marta Díaz-Menéndez
KAKristina M Angelo
Kristina M Angelo
RBRosa De Miguel Buckley
Rosa De Miguel Buckley
EBEmmanuel Bottieau
Emmanuel Bottieau
RHRalph Huits
Ralph Huits
DHDavidson H Hamer
Davidson H Hamer
Increasing numbers of travellers returning from Cuba with dengue virus infection were reported to the GeoSentinel Network from June to September 2022, reflecting an ongoing local outbreak. This report demonstrates the importance of travellers as sentinels of arboviral outbreaks and highlights the need for early identification of travel-related dengue.

29 April 2022 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
SCSara Carazo
Sara Carazo
DSDanuta M. Skowronski
Danuta M. Skowronski
MBMarc Brisson
Marc Brisson
CSChantal Sauvageau
Chantal Sauvageau
NBNicholas Brousseau
Nicholas Brousseau
GSGaston De Serres
Gaston De Serres
Importance Omicron is phylogenetically- and antigenically-distinct from earlier SARS-CoV-2 variants and the original vaccine strain. Protection conferred by prior SARS-CoV-2 infection against Omicron re-infection, and the added value of vaccination, require quantification. Objective To estimate protection against Omicron re-infection and hospitalization conferred by prior heterologous SARS-CoV-2 (non-Omicron) infection and/or up to three doses of (ancestral, Wuhan-like) mRNA vaccine. Design Test-negative study between December 26 (epi-week 52), 2021 and March 12 (epi-week 10), 2022. Setting Population-based, province of Quebec, Canada Participants Community-dwelling ≥12-year-olds tested for SARS-CoV-2. Exposures Prior laboratory-confirmed infection with/without mRNA vaccination. Outcomes Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 re-infection and hospitalization, presumed Omicron by genomic surveillance. The odds of prior non-Omicron infection with/without vaccination were compared among Omicron cases/hospitalizations versus test-negative controls (single randomly-selected per individual). Adjusted odds ratios controlled for age, sex, testing-indication and epi-week. Analyses were stratified by severity and time since last non-Omicron infection or vaccine dose. Results Without vaccination, prior non-Omicron infection reduced the Omicron re-infection risk by 44% (95%CI:38-48), decreasing from 66% (95%CI:57-73) at 3-5 months to 35% (95%CI:21-47) at 9-11 months post-infection and 2 doses of ancestral Wuhan-like vaccine may be of marginal incremental value to previously-infected individuals.