Peter Lucas

Prof. Dr. Peter Lucas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2014 in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMaarten van der Heijden
Maarten van der Heijden
MVMarina Velikova
Marina Velikova
PLPeter Lucas
Peter Lucas

9 October 2019 in JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LBLonneke Boer
Lonneke Boer
EBErik Bischoff
Erik Bischoff
MHMaarten van der Heijden
Maarten van der Heijden
PLPeter Lucas
Peter Lucas
RAReinier Akkermans
Reinier Akkermans
TSTjard R Schermer
Tjard R Schermer
Background: Many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) suffer from exacerbations, a worsening of their respiratory symptoms that warrants medical treatment. Exacerbations are often poorly recognized or managed by patients, leading to increased disease burden and health care costs. Objective: This study aimed to examine the effects of a smart mobile health (mHealth) tool that supports COPD patients in the self-management of exacerbations by providing predictions of early exacerbation onset and timely treatment advice without the interference of health care professionals. Methods: In a multicenter, 2-arm randomized controlled trial with 12-months follow-up, patients with COPD used the smart mHealth tool (intervention group) or a paper action plan (control group) when they experienced worsening of respiratory symptoms. For our primary outcome exacerbation-free time, expressed as weeks without exacerbation, we used an automated telephone questionnaire system to measure weekly respiratory symptoms and treatment actions. Secondary outcomes were health status, self-efficacy, self-management behavior, health care utilization, and usability. For our analyses, we used negative binomial regression, multilevel logistic regression, and generalized estimating equation regression models. Results: Of the 87 patients with COPD recruited from primary and secondary care centers, 43 were randomized to the intervention group. We found no statistically significant differences between the intervention group and the control group in exacerbation-free weeks (mean 30.6, SD 13.3 vs mean 28.0, SD 14.8 weeks, respectively; rate ratio 1.21; 95% CI 0.77-1.91) or in health status, self-efficacy, self-management behavior, and health care utilization. Patients using the mHealth tool valued it as a more supportive tool than patients using the paper action plan. Patients considered the usability of the mHealth tool as good. Conclusions: This study did not show beneficial effects of a smart mHealth tool on exacerbation-free time, health status, self-efficacy, self-management behavior, and health care utilization in patients with COPD compared with the use of a paper action plan. Participants were positive about the supportive function and the usability of the mHealth tool. mHealth may be a valuable alternative for COPD patients who prefer a digital tool instead of a paper action plan. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02553096; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02553096.

1 April 2019 in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLManxia Liu
Manxia Liu
Fabio StellaFabio Stella
Fabio Stella
AHArjen Hommersom
Arjen Hommersom
PLPeter Lucas
Peter Lucas
LBLonneke Boer
Lonneke Boer
EBErik Bischoff
Erik Bischoff

8 January 2008 in Intensive Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SVStefan Visscher
Stefan Visscher
CSCarolina A. M. Schurink
Carolina A. M. Schurink
WMWilhelmina G. Melsen
Wilhelmina G. Melsen
PLPeter Lucas
Peter Lucas
MBMarc Bonten
Marc Bonten

19 July 2020 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
NFNorman Fenton
Norman Fenton
SMScott McLachlan
Scott McLachlan
PLPeter Lucas
Peter Lucas
KDKudakwashe Dube
Kudakwashe Dube
GHGraham A Hitman
Graham A Hitman
MNMartin David Neil
Martin David Neil
Concerns about the practicality and effectiveness of using Contact Tracing Apps (CTA) to reduce the spread of COVID19 have been well documented and, in the UK, led to the abandonment of the NHS CTA shortly after its release in May 2020. One of the key non-technical obstacles to widespread adoption of CTA has been concerns about privacy. We present a causal probabilistic model (a Bayesian network) that provides the basis for a practical CTA solution that does not compromise privacy. Users of the model can provide as much or little personal information as they wish about relevant risk factors, symptoms, and recent social interactions. The model then provides them feedback about the likelihood of the presence of asymptotic, mild or severe COVID19 (past, present and projected). When the model is embedded in a smartphone app, it can be used to detect new outbreaks in a monitored population and identify outbreak locations as early as possible. For this purpose, the only data needed to be centrally collected is the probability the user has COVID19 and the GPS location.

1 June 2016 in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMarcos L.P. Bueno
Marcos L.P. Bueno
AHArjen Hommersom
Arjen Hommersom
PLPeter Lucas
Peter Lucas
MLMartijn Lappenschaar
Martijn Lappenschaar
JJJoost G.E. Janzing
Joost G.E. Janzing