Jiping Tao

Prof. Dr. Jiping Tao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2016 in Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TLTun-Dong Liu
Tun-Dong Liu
LXLiang-You Xu
Liang-You Xu
GSGuifang Shao
Guifang Shao
NTNa-Na Tu
Na-Na Tu
JTJiping Tao
Jiping Tao
YWYuhua Wen
Yuhua Wen

1 September 2017 in Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJiping Tao
Jiping Tao
QJQing-Shuang Ji
Qing-Shuang Ji
GSGuifang Shao
Guifang Shao
ZLZe-Peng Li
Ze-Peng Li
TLTun-Dong Liu
Tun-Dong Liu
YWYuhua Wen
Yuhua Wen

1 April 2010 in Information Processing Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJiping Tao
Jiping Tao
ZCZhijun Chao
Zhijun Chao
YXYugeng Xi
Yugeng Xi
YTYe Tao
Ye Tao

1 January 2016 in Applied Mathematics and Computation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRan Ma
Ran Ma
JTJiping Tao
Jiping Tao
JYJinjiang Yuan
Jinjiang Yuan

1 December 2024 in Physics of Fluids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMin Dai
Min Dai
JTJiping Tao
Jiping Tao
YZYi Zhao
Yi Zhao
Fei XingFei Xing
Fei Xing
Modeling complex fluid flow using machine learning is increasingly recognized as a valuable approach for revealing multiphase fluid phenomena. Bubble dynamics represent a classical two-phase flow problem that plays a crucial role in various engineering domains. In this paper, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are applied to facilitate incompressible two-phase bubble motion modeling by integrating governing equations and interface evolution equations. The loss function of PINNs consists of multiple loss terms, including initial and boundary conditions constraints, partial differential equations residuals, and volume fraction constraints. The performance of PINNs is influenced by the competing effects of these loss terms. Therefore, we introduce a heuristic adaptive weights approach to automatically adjust loss weights for each training point, avoiding manual tuning and improving the accuracy of PINNs. We investigate typical bubble motion cases, specifically focusing on bubble rising and breakup, to showcase the capabilities of the proposed method. We explore the impact of weights and present the results in comparison to the baselines. Through the bubble breakup case, we illustrate that our model shows superior performance even with more complex scenarios. Then we further discuss the generalization and robustness of our model, showing their indispensability over traditional solvers in gas–liquid two-phase systems. Specifically, we accelerate computation speed in transfer learning without the need to modify the original model. We also show that our method effectively solves ill-posed problems, such as those without initial data or with incomplete or noisy boundary conditions.