Christina Heber Hagerty Hagerty

Dr. Christina Heber Hagerty Hagerty

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 May 2021 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CYChuntao Yin
Chuntao Yin
DSDaniel C. Schlatter
Daniel C. Schlatter
DKDuncan R. Kroese
Duncan R. Kroese
TPTimothy C. Paulitz
Timothy C. Paulitz
CHChristina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
Christina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
Liming is an effective agricultural practice and is broadly used to ameliorate soil acidification in agricultural ecosystems. Our understanding of the impacts of lime application on the soil fungal community is scarce. In this study, we explored the responses of fungal communities to liming at two locations with decreasing soil pH in Oregon in the Pacific Northwest using high-throughput sequencing (Illumina MiSeq). Our results revealed that the location and liming did not significantly affect soil fungal diversity and richness, and the impact of soil depth on fungal diversity varied among locations. In contrast, location and soil depth had a strong effect on the structure and composition of soil fungal communities, whereas the impact of liming was much smaller, and location- and depth-dependent. Interestingly, families Lasiosphaeriaceae, Piskurozymaceae, and Sordariaceae predominated in the surface soil (0–7.5 cm) and were positively correlated with soil OM and aluminum, and negatively correlated with pH. The family Kickxellaceae which predominated in deeper soil (15–22.5 cm), had an opposite response to soil OM. Furthermore, some taxa in Ascomycota, such as Hypocreales, Peziza and Penicillium, were increased by liming at one of the locations (Moro). In conclusion, these findings suggest that fungal community structure and composition rather than fungal diversity responded to location, soil depth and liming. Compared to liming, location and depth had a stronger effect on the soil fungal community, but some specific fungal taxa shifted with lime application.

1 March 2025 in Agronomy Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Judit BarrosoJudit Barroso
Judit Barroso
CRCatherine L. Reardon
Catherine L. Reardon
Surendra SinghSurendra Singh
Surendra Singh
SMStephen Machado
Stephen Machado
JGJennifer A. Gourlie
Jennifer A. Gourlie
CHChristina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
Christina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
Cover cropping in the fallow phase of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–fallow systems of the semiarid Pacific Northwest has been identified as an opportunity to build resilience and enhance farm profitability. Nine fall‐ and spring‐sown cover crops (CCs) grown during the traditional fallow period were evaluated at sites in the low and intermediate precipitation zones of the region in a 2‐year study (2021 and 2022). The fall‐sown CCs included winter pea (Pisum sativum L.), winter lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.), and fall species mix; and the spring‐sown CCs included common vetch, yellow mustard, lacy phacelia, tillage radish (Raphanus sativus L.), spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and a spring species mix. CCs were evaluated for biomass production and impacts on soil water and weeds. CC growth was dependent on location, year, planting timing, and CC species. Fall‐sown CCs generally produced more biomass than spring‐sown CCs across site‐years, with winter peas and the fall species mix being most productive. Following a year of greater than average precipitation, no negative effects of CCs on fall soil moisture were observed at the intermediate precipitation site, while fall‐sown CCs reduced soil moisture at the low precipitation site. The suppressive effect of CCs on weeds ranged from null to moderate, depending on site, year, and CC seeding time. Fall‐sown CCs more consistently suppressed weeds than spring‐sown CCs. Additionally, fall‐sown CCs were terminated in the spring before weeds set viable seeds, saving a herbicide application and reducing herbicide pressure without exacerbating future weed issues. Overall, select fall‐sown CCs showed promise to enhance ecosystem services during the traditional fallow period.

1 January 2021 in Plant Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHChristina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
Christina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
AKAnn M. Klein
Ann M. Klein
CRCatherine L. Reardon
Catherine L. Reardon
DKDuncan R. Kroese
Duncan R. Kroese
CMCaroline J. Melle
Caroline J. Melle
CMChristopher Mundt
Christopher Mundt
Zymoseptoria tritici is the causal agent of Septoria tritici blotch (STB), a disease of wheat (Triticum aestivum) that results in significant yield loss worldwide. Z. tritici’s life cycle, reproductive system, effective population size, and gene flow put it at high likelihood of developing fungicide resistance. Succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicides (FRAC code 7) were not widely used to control STB in the Willamette Valley until 2016. Field isolates of Z. tritici collected in the Willamette Valley at dates spanning the introduction of SDHI (2015 to 2017) were screened for sensitivity to four SDHI active ingredients: benzovindiflupyr, penthiopyrad, fluxapyroxad, and fluindapyr. Fungicide sensitivity changes were determined by the fungicide concentration at which fungal growth is decreased by 50% (EC50) values. The benzovindiflupyr EC50 values increased significantly, indicating a reduction in sensitivity, following the adoption of SDHI fungicides in Oregon (P < 0.0001). Additionally, significant reduction in cross-sensitivity among SDHI active ingredients was also observed with a moderate and significant relationship between penthiopyrad and benzovindiflupyr (P = 0.0002) and a weak relationship between penthiopyrad and fluxapyroxad (P = 0.0482). No change in cross-sensitivity was observed with fluindapyr, which has not yet been labeled in the region. The results document a decrease in SDHI sensitivity in Z. tritici isolates following the introduction of the active ingredients to the Willamette Valley. The reduction in cross-sensitivity observed between SDHI active ingredients highlights the notion that careful consideration is required to manage fungicide resistance and suggests that within-group rotation is insufficient for resistance management.

1 October 2020 in Plant Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CYChuntao Yin
Chuntao Yin
KMKatherine McLaughlin
Katherine McLaughlin
TPTimothy Paulitz
Timothy Paulitz
DKDuncan R. Kroese
Duncan R. Kroese
CHChristina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
Christina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
No-till or direct seeding can be described as seeding directly into the crop stubble from the previous season without use of tillage. A reduction in tillage can result in many benefits, including increased soil organic matter, increased water holding capacity, and reduced fuel costs. However, the effect of no-till and reduced tillage on crop root disease profiles is poorly understood. To study the effect of tillage on disease dynamics, soil samples were collected from commercial wheat fields representing a wide range of tillage strategies in fall 2016 and fall 2017. Because precipitation might affect soilborne diseases, wheat fields located across a diverse gradient of precipitation zones of the dryland Pacific Northwest were selected. Fusarium spp., Pythium spp., and Rhizoctonia spp. were quantified from soil samples using soil dilution plating and quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays. Results of dilution plating showed that the colony counts of Fusarium, Pythium, and Rhizoctonia at the genus level were negatively associated with tillage. However, the same patterns were not observed when specific causal agents of Fusarium, Pythium, and Rhizoctonia that are known to be pathogenic on wheat were quantified with qPCR. Furthermore, precipitation affected the population density of some fungal pathogens (F. culmorum, P. ultimum, and R. solani AG 8). Within the scope of inference of this study, results of this study indicate that the benefits of adopting reduced tillage likely outweigh potential risk for increased root disease.

1 March 2017 in Phytopathology®
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CHChristina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
Christina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
NANicole P. Anderson
Nicole P. Anderson
CMChristopher C. Mundt
Christopher C. Mundt
Fungicide resistance can cause disease control failure in agricultural systems, and is particularly concerning with Zymoseptoria tritici, the causal agent of Septoria tritici blotch of wheat. In North America, the first quinone outside inhibitor resistance in Z. tritici was discovered in the Willamette Valley of Oregon in 2012, which prompted this hierarchical survey of commercial winter wheat fields to monitor azoxystrobin- and propiconazole-resistant Z. tritici. Surveys were conducted in June 2014, January 2015, May 2015, and January 2016. The survey was organized in a hierarchical scheme: regions within the Willamette Valley, fields within the region, transects within the field, and samples within the transect. Overall, frequency of azoxystrobin-resistant isolates increased from 63 to 93% from June 2014 to January 2016. Resistance to azoxystrobin increased over time even within fields receiving no strobilurin applications. Propiconazole sensitivity varied over the course of the study but, overall, did not significantly change. Sensitivity to both fungicides showed no regional aggregation within the Willamette Valley. Greater than 80% of spatial variation in fungicide sensitivity was at the smallest hierarchical scale (within the transect) of the survey for both fungicides, and the resistance phenotypes were randomly distributed within sampled fields. Results suggest a need for a better understanding of the dynamics of fungicide resistance at the landscape level.

1 January 2021 in Plant Health Progress
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHChristina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
Christina Heber Hagerty Hagerty
TITessa Irvine
Tessa Irvine
HRHannah M. Rivedal
Hannah M. Rivedal
CYChuntao Yin
Chuntao Yin
DKDuncan R. Kroese
Duncan R. Kroese
Fusarium crown rot of winter wheat is an economically important disease in most regions where winter wheat is grown. Fusarium crown rot is caused by Fusarium culmorum and F. pseudograminearum. This diagnostic guide details information to aid in field, molecular, and morphological diagnosis of Fusarium crown rot.