Suman Sinha

Dr. Suman Sinha

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 June 2016 in Journal of Earth System Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSuman Sinha
Suman Sinha
CJC Jeganathan
C Jeganathan
LSLaxmi Kant Sharma
Laxmi Kant Sharma
MNM S Nathawat
M S Nathawat
ADAnup K Das
Anup K Das
SMShiv Mohan
Shiv Mohan

1 September 2020 in Advances In Space Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSuman Sinha
Suman Sinha
ASAbhisek Santra
Abhisek Santra
SMShreyashi Santra Mitra
Shreyashi Santra Mitra

20 November 2019 in Carbon Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSuman Sinha
Suman Sinha
SMShiv Mohan
Shiv Mohan
Anup Kumar DasAnup Kumar Das
Anup Kumar Das
LSLaxmi Kant Sharma
Laxmi Kant Sharma
Chockalingam JeganathanChockalingam Jeganathan
Chockalingam Jeganathan
MNM. S. Nathawat
M. S. Nathawat
An optimal model was developed for accounting forest carbon stock from synergistic use of optical data from Landsat TM and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data from COSMO-Skymed (X-band), Radarsat-2 (C-band) and ALOS PALSAR (L-band) sensors over a tropical deciduous heterogeneous forest of India. The best-fit integrated multiple linear regression model had a model accuracy of 83%, r2 = 0.96, root mean square error = 10.02 Mg/ha and Willmott’s index of agreement of 0.98. The model further validated using chi-squared and t-test. Results of models for calculating the aboveground biomass (AGB) were converted to C and CO2 using conversion factors. Average AGB, C and CO2 were 70.5, 35.26 and 130.89 Mg/ha, respectively. The synergistic use of optical and multi-frequency SAR data enhanced the AGB saturation threshold to about 150 Mg/ha for tropical deciduous mixed forests. Hence, the synergistic use of this data is suggested for large-scale AGB and C estimations for tropical forests. Optical remote sensing sensors are extensively used due to greater data availability despite their poor sensitivity toward forest parameters. In contrast, SAR signals are highly sensitive toward forest biophysical and structural parameters, providing a better alternative. This unique integrated approach provides valuable information regarding the spatial distribution and quantification of forest biomass and carbon.

30 October 2017 in Journal of Forestry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSuman Sinha
Suman Sinha
ASAbhisek Santra
Abhisek Santra
LSLaxmi Kant Sharma
Laxmi Kant Sharma
Chockalingam JeganathanChockalingam Jeganathan
Chockalingam Jeganathan
MNMahendra Singh Nathawat
Mahendra Singh Nathawat
SMShiv Mohan
Shiv Mohan