Jose Antonio Galián Megías

Dr. Jose Antonio Galián Megías

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 May 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMaría Victoria Martínez-Sánchez
María Victoria Martínez-Sánchez
JFJosé L Fuster
José L Fuster
JCJosé Antonio Campillo
José Antonio Campillo
AGAna Galera
Ana Galera
MBMar Bermúdez-Cortés
Mar Bermúdez-Cortés
ALFREDO MINGUELA PURASALFREDO MINGUELA PURAS
ALFREDO MINGUELA PURAS
Acute leukemia is the most common malignancy in children. Most patients are cured, but refractory/relapsed AML and ALL are the first cause of death from malignancy in children. Maintenance chemotherapy in ALL has improved survival by inducing leukemic cell apoptosis, but immune surveillance effectors such as NK cells might also contribute. The outcome of B-ALL (n = 70), T-ALL (n = 16), and AML (n = 16) pediatric patients was evaluated according to leukemic cell expression of ligands for activating and inhibiting receptors that regulate NK cell functioning. Increased expression of ULBP-1, a ligand for NKG2D, but not that of CD112 or CD155, ligands for DNAM-1, was associated with poorer 5-year event-free survival (5y-EFS, 77.6% vs. 94.9%, p < 0.03). Reduced expression of HLA-C on leukemic cells in patients with the KIR2DL1/HLA-C*04 interaction was associated with a higher rate of relapse (17.6% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.035) and lower 5y-EFS (70.6% vs. 92.6%, p < 0.002). KIR2DL1/HLA-C*04 interaction was an independent predictive factor of events (HR = 4.795, p < 0.005) or death (HR = 6.731, p < 0.005) and might provide additional information to the current risk stratification. Children who carry the KIR2DL1/HLA-C*04 interaction were refractory to current chemotherapy treatments, including allogeneic stem cell transplantation; therefore, they should be considered as candidates for alternative biological therapies that might offer better results.

23 September 2025 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMarina Fernández-González
Marina Fernández-González
SVSantiago Llorente Viñas
Santiago Llorente Viñas
CBCarmen Botella
Carmen Botella
JMJose Antonio Galián Megías
Jose Antonio Galián Megías
RGRosana González-López
Rosana González-López
Manuel MuroManuel Muro
Manuel Muro
Nowadays, there have truly been spectacular advances in surgical techniques, the preservation of organs for transplants, the optimal and efficient selection of both donors and recipients, a more efficient diagnosis and prediction of possible complications of transplants, and important progress in the advances of pharmacological immunosuppression protocols and procedures. In this sense, survival rates after transplantation of various organs have been progressively increasing, especially in the case of lung transplants, whose average survival rate is usually lower than that of other types of solid organ transplants. Thus, detecting acute and subclinical rejection and chronic allograft rejection of any implant is important. This is important in all transplants, such as heart and lung transplants. In this last type of transplant, particularly, and due to the chronic dysfunction of the lung allograft, it is key to detect rejection early and on time, since it can reach close to half of the transplant patient population. Therefore, practical diagnostic tools are needed to visualize the level of allograft damage using genomic methods such as those that measure donor-derived cell-free DNA, where its amount increases in the plasma component of the transplant after tissue injury or due to allograft infection. This biomarker has become a key element with light and hope, but with some shadows of caution due to its use as a panacea. Our research team has experience in solid organ transplantation in quantifying this parameter in the progression of the lesion of the implanted allograft, and our experience and comparison with the published literature will be presented in the following review, discussing validated and non-validated results.

16 November 2024 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CBCarmen Botella
Carmen Botella
JMJose Antonio Galián Megías
Jose Antonio Galián Megías
VJVictor Jiménez-Coll
Victor Jiménez-Coll
MFMarina Fernández-González
Marina Fernández-González
FMFrancisco Morales
Francisco Morales
Manuel MuroManuel Muro
Manuel Muro
(1) Background: donor-derived circulating free DNA (dd-cfDNA), an innovative biomarker with great potential for the early identification and prevention of graft damage. (2) Methods: Samples were collected prospectively and the study was performed retrospectively to analyze dd-cfDNA plasma levels in 30 kidney transplant patients during their post-transplant follow-up (15 days, 3, 6, and 9 months), to determine if the result could be of interest in the identification of possible adverse events, especially rejection. The aim was to verify whether the data on sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV compare with reference values and creatinine values. (3) Results: We observed levels of dd cfDNA > 1% in six of nine patients with active rejection (ABMR or TCMR) and elevated values (>0.5%) in two other patients in this rejection group. Our results show low values of sensitivity = 50%, specificity = 61.11%, rejection NPV = 64.71%, and rejection PPV = 46.13% of the technique compared to reference values previously published. With respect to creatinine, only for TCRM, we observed better results for dd-cfDNA in these parameters than in creatinine. Also, our data suggest that dd-cfDNA could help to differentiate those patients with dnDSAs that are going to through rejection better than creatinine, specially at 15 d post transplant. In this study, this appears to have no positive predictive value for borderline rejection (BR) or TCMR IA. (4) Conclusions: plasma levels of dd-cfDNA could be considered an additional or alternative biomarker for graft rejection monitoring in early post-kidney transplant up to several months before its clinical presentation, especially for patients with suspected TCMR or ABMR.

27 June 2025 in Hemato
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMaría Hidalgo
María Hidalgo
EREduardo Ramos-Elbal
Eduardo Ramos-Elbal
JMJose Antonio Galián Megías
Jose Antonio Galián Megías
HMHelios Martínez-Banaclocha
Helios Martínez-Banaclocha
MFMercedes Plaza Fornieles
Mercedes Plaza Fornieles
JFJosé L Fuster
José L Fuster
Background/Objectives: Intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21) represents a rare and heterogeneous distinct cytogenetic subgroup of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) initially associated with a poor prognosis. Treatment intensification with additional doses of methotrexate and asparaginase was associated with better treatment outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated the impact of iAMP21 on treatment outcome in a cohort of pediatric patients treated with an intensified asparaginase regimen and describe the genomic landscape of four patients with iAMP21. Results: Four out of 89 patients > 1 year old were classified as iAMP21 positive. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) was inferior in the iAMP21-positive group: 25% versus 85.6% (p = 0.001). The cumulative incidence of relapse and treatment-related mortality were 50% vs. 9.9% and 0% vs. 2.38%, respectively, in the iAMP21-positive and non-iAMP21 groups (p = 0.02 and 0.76, respectively). These results did not translate into a significant difference in overall survival: 100% vs. 93.7% (p = 0.6). The presence of iAMP21 (HR 7.68, 95% CI 2.04–29.05; p = 0.002) and a measurable residual disease ≥1% after induction on day +33 (HR 8.82, 95% CI 2.6–29.91; p = 0.001) retained significant negative impact on EFS in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: We found an independent significant prognostic impact of iAMP21 on EFS among pediatric patients with ALL, and clinical presentation and early treatment response did not classify these patients as HR. Diverse genetic backgrounds among iAMP21-positive patients might influence the treatment response and outcome of this heterogeneous disease.

26 August 2024 in Bone Marrow Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAndrea Poveda-García
Andrea Poveda-García
EREstela Ruiz
Estela Ruiz
MMMaría José Moreno
María José Moreno
IEIgnacio Español
Ignacio Español
ASAndrés Sánchez-Salinas
Andrés Sánchez-Salinas
VCValentín Cabañas
Valentín Cabañas

7 November 2025 in Antibodies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMarina Fernández-González
Marina Fernández-González
SVSantiago Llorente Viñas
Santiago Llorente Viñas
JMJose Antonio Galián Megías
Jose Antonio Galián Megías
CBCarmen Botella
Carmen Botella
RGRosana González-López
Rosana González-López
Manuel MuroManuel Muro
Manuel Muro
B cells have attracted increasing interest in the field of organ transplantation due to their newly discovered immunoregulatory properties in alloimmune responses. Traditionally, B cells have been primarily associated with adaptive immunity to foreign substances and alloreactive immune response to allografts, differentiating into antibody-producing plasma cells or memory cells upon antigen recognition and T cell collaboration. However, the existence of B cells with regulatory functions (Bregs) in humans has been widely confirmed, highlighting the presence of this subset, which has immunosuppressive properties and which might contribute to allograft tolerance, within the B cell compartment in humans and mice. In this mini review, we summarize all the information available in the published reports about the role of regulatory B cells in solid organ transplantation.