Vascular surgery has evolved from durable yet invasive open reconstructions to less traumatic endovascular techniques. While endovascular repair reduces perioperative morbidity, it introduces durability challenges and the need for lifelong surveillance. Laparoscopic surgery bridged some gaps but was hindered by steep learning curves and technical limitations. Robotic-assisted surgery represents a “third revolution”, combining the durability of open repair with the recovery and ergonomic benefits of minimally invasive approaches through enhanced 3D visualization, wristed instrumentation, and tremor filtration. This review synthesizes current evidence on robotic applications in vascular surgery, including aortic, visceral, venous, and endovascular interventions. Feasibility of robotic vascular surgery has been demonstrated in over 1500 patients across aortic, visceral, venous, and decompression procedures. Reported outcomes include pooled conversion rates of ~5%, 30-day mortality of 1–3%, and long-term patency rates exceeding 90% in aortoiliac occlusive disease. Similarly favorable outcomes have been observed in AAA repair, visceral artery aneurysm repair, IVC reconstructions, renal vein transpositions, and minimally invasive decompression procedures such as median arcuate ligament and thoracic outlet syndromes. Endovascular robotics enhances catheter navigation precision and reduces operator radiation exposure by 85–95%, with multiple series demonstrating consistent benefit compared to manual techniques. Despite these advantages, adoption is limited by high costs, lack of dedicated vascular instruments, absent haptic feedback on most platforms, and the need for standardized training. Most available evidence is observational and from high-volume centers, highlighting the need for multicenter randomized trials. Future directions include AI-enabled planning and augmented-reality navigation, which are the most feasible near-term technologies since they rely largely on software integration with existing systems. Other advances such as microsurgical robotics, soft-robotic platforms, and telesurgery remain longer-term developments requiring new hardware and regulatory pathways. Overcoming barriers through collaborative innovation, structured training, and robust evidence generation is essential for robotics to become a new standard in vascular care.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a significant vascular condition characterized by the dilation of the abdominal aorta, presenting a substantial risk of rupture and associated high mortality rates. Current management strategies primarily rely on aneurysm diameter and growth rates to predict rupture risk and determine the timing of surgical intervention. However, this approach has limitations, as ruptures can occur in smaller AAAs below surgical thresholds, and many large AAAs remain stable without intervention. This review highlights the need for more precise and individualized assessment tools that integrate biomechanical parameters such as wall stress, wall strength, and hemodynamic factors. Advancements in imaging modalities like ultrasound elastography, computed tomography (CT) angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), combined with artificial intelligence, offer enhanced capabilities to assess biomechanical indices and predict rupture risk more accurately. Incorporating these technologies can lead to personalized medicine approaches, improving decision-making regarding the timing of interventions. Additionally, emerging treatments focusing on targeted delivery of therapeutics to weakened areas of the aortic wall, such as nanoparticle-based drug delivery, stem cell therapy, and gene editing techniques like CRISPR-Cas9, show promise in strengthening the aortic wall and halting aneurysm progression. By validating advanced screening modalities and developing targeted treatments, the future management of AAA aims to reduce unnecessary surgeries, prevent ruptures, and significantly improve patient outcomes.

Kidney Transplant is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. However, a subset of otherwise eligible patients have severe iliac artery calcification that preclude them from receiving a kidney transplant. This report highlights the application of a physician-modified external iliac artery stent graft with a side branch extension (SBE) to facilitate successful kidney transplantation in a 69-year-old African American female who was otherwise ineligible for kidney transplant due to the presence of severe circumferential bilateral iliac artery calcification. Four months later, the patient received a kidney transplant and recovered without complications. Her duplex ultrasound (DUS) revealed patent vasculature to the kidney graft, she produced adequate urine output, and creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) normalized by discharge. This underscores the potential for stent graft with SBE as an option for patients who were traditionally ineligible for kidney transplantation due to the presence of severe aortoiliac calcification.

Background: Patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia (NoCLTI), lacking suitable distal arteries for conventional revascularization, face major limb amputation. The 1-year mortality rate after major amputation is 48.3%, increasing to 70.9% in 3 years. Open deep venous arterialization (DVA) offers a promising alternative for limb salvage, achievable through open, endovascular, or hybrid approaches. We aim to provide a comprehensive, step-by-step guide to performing open DVA in NoCLTI patients, addressing preoperative and postoperative considerations as well as the technical details of the procedure. Methods: Patient selection for open DVA focuses on individuals with NoCLTI at high risk for amputation. Preoperative assessments include evaluating risk factors, determining limb threat severity using the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) score, and mapping anatomical patterns via the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS). The procedure involves identifying the target artery using Doppler ultrasound, performing microdissection to expose the artery and vein, ligating proximal vein branches, and creating a side-to-side anastomosis. Venous valves are disrupted with a valvulotome to allow antegrade flow. A proximal bypass graft may be applied if necessary. Results: Postoperatively, patients are monitored for 2–4 days with frequent Doppler assessments. Anticoagulation therapy begins with a heparin drip, transitioning to oral agents and/or dual antiplatelet therapy. Wound care includes deferred debridement for 2–4 weeks and may involve negative-pressure therapy. Follow-up involves weekly visits for the first month, and then at 3 months, and every 6 months thereafter, with surveillance using transcutaneous oxygen measurement, the toe–brachial index, and arterial duplex ultrasound. Conclusions: Open DVA represents a viable limb salvage option for patients with NoCLTI, potentially avoiding major amputations and improving quality of life. Success depends on careful patient selection, a meticulous surgical technique, and comprehensive postoperative care.