Inese Cakstina-Dzerve

Dr. Inese Cakstina-Dzerve

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 September 2009 in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
URUna Riekstiņa
Una Riekstiņa
ICInese Cakstina-Dzerve
Inese Cakstina-Dzerve
VPVadims Parfejevs
Vadims Parfejevs
MHMartin Hoogduijn
Martin Hoogduijn
GJGeorgs Jankovskis
Georgs Jankovskis
JAJanis Ancans
Janis Ancans

1 November 2008 in Cytotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
URUna Riekstiņa
Una Riekstiņa
RMRuta Muceniece
Ruta Muceniece
ICInese Cakstina-Dzerve
Inese Cakstina-Dzerve
IMIndrikis Muiznieks
Indrikis Muiznieks
JAJanis Ancans
Janis Ancans

1 February 2017 in Journal of the European Ceramic Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
INInga Narkevica
Inga Narkevica
LSLiga Stipniece
Liga Stipniece
EJEriks Jakobsons
Eriks Jakobsons
ICInese Cakstina-Dzerve
Inese Cakstina-Dzerve
JOJurijs Ozolins
Jurijs Ozolins

25 September 2020 in BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nityanand JainNityanand Jain
Nityanand Jain
DNDina Nitisa
Dina Nitisa
VPValdis Pirsko
Valdis Pirsko
ICInese Cakstina-Dzerve
Inese Cakstina-Dzerve
Background: MCF-7 breast cancer cell line is undoubtedly amongst the most extensively studied patient-derived research models, providing pivotal results that have over the decades translated to constantly improving patient care. Many research groups, have previously identified suitable reference genes for qPCR normalization in MCF-7 cell line. However, over the course of identification of suitable reference genes, a comparative analysis comprising these genes together in a single study has not been reported. Furthermore, the expression dynamics of these reference genes within sub-clones cultured over multiple passages (p) has attracted limited attention from research groups. Therefore, we investigated the expression dynamics of 12 previously suggested reference genes within two sub-clones (culture A1 and A2) cultured identically over multiple passages. Additionally, the effect of nutrient stress on reference gene expression was examined to postulate an evidence-based recommendation of the least variable reference genes that could be employed in future gene expression studies. Results: The analysis revealed the presence of differential reference gene expression within the sub-clones of MCF-7. In culture A1, GAPDH-CCSER2 were identified as the least variable reference genes while for culture A2, GAPDH-RNA28S were identified. However, upon validation using genes of interest, both these pairs were found to be unsuitable control pairs. Normalization of AURKA and KRT19 with triplet pair GAPDH-CCSER2-PCBP1 yielded successful results. The triplet also proved its capability to handle variations arising from nutrient stress. Conclusions: The variance in expression behavior amongst sub-clones highlights the potential need for exercising caution while selecting reference genes for MCF-7. GAPDH-CCSER2-PCBP1 triplet offers a reliable alternative to otherwise traditionally used internal controls for optimizing intra- and inter-assay gene expression differences. Furthermore, we suggest avoiding the use of ACTB, GAPDH and PGK1 as single internal controls.

11 October 2006 in Plant Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPatrick Babinger
Patrick Babinger
RVR. Völkl
R. Völkl
ICInese Cakstina-Dzerve
Inese Cakstina-Dzerve
AMA. Maftei
A. Maftei
RSR. Schmitt
R. Schmitt

30 March 2018 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VPValdis Pirsko
Valdis Pirsko
ICInese Cakstina-Dzerve
Inese Cakstina-Dzerve
MPMarta Priedite
Marta Priedite
RDRasma Dortane
Rasma Dortane
LFLinda Feldmane
Linda Feldmane
EMEdvins Miklasevics
Edvins Miklasevics
Background and objectives: Cell culture is one of the mainstays in the research of breast cancer biology, although the extent to which this approach allows to preserve the original characteristics of originating tumor and implications of cell culture findings to real life situations have been widely debated in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine the role of three cell culture media on transcriptional expression of breast cancer markers in three breast cancer reference cell lines (MCF7, SkBr3 and MDA-MB-436). Materials and methods: Cell lines were conditioned in three studied media (all containing 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) + hormones/growth factors; different composition of basal media) for four passages. Population growth was characterized by cumulative population doubling levels, average generation time, cell yield and viability at the fourth passage. Transcriptional expression of breast cancer differentiation markers and regulatory transcriptional programs was measured by qPCR. Results: Differences in the composition of growth media significantly influenced the growth of studied cell lines and the expression of mammary lineage governing transcriptional programs and luminal/basal markers. Effects of media on transcriptional expression were more pronounced in luminal cell lines (MCF7, SkBr3), than in the basal cell line (MDA-MB-436). Changes in growth media in terms of supplementation and basal medium delayed growth of cells, but improved cell yields. Conclusions: The expression of breast cancer cell differentiation phenotypic markers depends on the composition of cell growth medium, therefore cell culture as a tool in phenotypic studies should be used considering this effect. The findings of such studies should always be interpreted with caution. The formulation of cell growth media has greater effect on the expression of phenotypic markers in luminal, rather than basal cell lines. Media containing mitogens and higher vitamin content improved efficacy of cell culture in terms of cell yields, although greatly increased growth times.