Raymund R. Razonable

Prof. Raymund R. Razonable


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

6 March 2013 in American Journal of Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRRaymund R. Razonable
Raymund R. Razonable
AHA. Humar
A. Humar
TPthe AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice
the AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice
Click on the article title to read more.

4 November 2011 in Reviews in Medical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPPhilip E. Pellett
Philip E. Pellett
DADharam V. Ablashi
Dharam V. Ablashi
PAPeter Ambros
Peter Ambros
HAHenri Agut
Henri Agut
MCMary T. Caserta
Mary T. Caserta
RRRaymund R. Razonable
Raymund R. Razonable
SUMMARY: Chromosomally integrated human herpesvirus 6 (ciHHV‐6) is a condition in which the complete HHV‐6 genome is integrated into the host germ line genome and is vertically transmitted in a Mendelian manner. The condition is found in less than 1% of controls in the USA and UK, but has been found at a somewhat higher prevalence in transplant recipients and other patient populations in several small studies. HHV‐6 levels in whole blood that exceed 5.5 log10 copies/ml are strongly suggestive of ciHHV‐6. Monitoring DNA load in plasma and serum is unreliable, both for identifying and for monitoring subjects with ciHHV‐6 due to cell lysis and release of cellular DNA. High HHV‐6 DNA loads associated with ciHHV‐6 can lead to erroneous diagnosis of active infection. Transplant recipients with ciHHV‐6 may be at increased risk for bacterial infection and graft rejection. ciHHV‐6 can be induced to a state of active viral replication in vitro. It is not known whether ciHHV‐6 individuals are put at clinical risk by the use of drugs that have been associated with HHV‐6 reactivation in vivo or in vitro. Nonetheless, we urge careful observation when use of such drugs is indicated in individuals known to have ciHHV‐6. Little is known about whether individuals with ciHHV‐6 develop immune tolerance for viral proteins. Further research is needed to determine the role of ciHHV‐6 in disease. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1 January 2013 in Infection & Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PRPoornima Ramanan
Poornima Ramanan
RRRaymund R. Razonable
Raymund R. Razonable
Ramanan P, et al. Infect Chemother. 2013 Sep;45(3):260-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.3947/ic.2013.45.3.260

15 March 2008 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SASupha K. Arthurs
Supha K. Arthurs
AEAlbert J. Eid
Albert J. Eid
RPRachel A. Pedersen
Rachel A. Pedersen
WKWalter K. Kremers
Walter K. Kremers
FCFernando G. Cosio
Fernando G. Cosio
RRRaymund R. Razonable
Raymund R. Razonable
Background. During the contemporary era of antiviral prophylaxis, the impact of delayed-onset primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease on the outcome of

1 October 2013 in Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RRRaymund R. Razonable
Raymund R. Razonable
RHRandall T. Hayden
Randall T. Hayden
SUMMARY The negative impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection on transplant outcomes warrants efforts toward improving its prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. During the last 2 decades, significant breakthroughs in diagnostic virology have facilitated remarkable improvements in CMV disease management. During this period, CMV nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) evolved to become one of the most commonly performed tests in clinical virology laboratories. NAT provides a means for rapid and sensitive diagnosis of CMV infection in transplant recipients. Viral quantification also introduced several principles of CMV disease management. Specifically, viral load has been utilized (i) for prognostication of CMV disease, (ii) to guide preemptive therapy, (iii) to assess the efficacy of antiviral treatment, (iv) to guide the duration of treatment, and (v) to indicate the risk of clinical relapse or antiviral drug resistance. However, there remain important limitations that require further optimization, including the interassay variability in viral load reporting, which has limited the generation of standardized viral load thresholds for various clinical indications. The recent introduction of an international reference standard should advance the major goal of uniform viral load reporting and interpretation. However, it has also become apparent that other aspects of NAT should be standardized, including sample selection, nucleic acid extraction, amplification, detection, and calibration, among others. This review article synthesizes the vast amount of information on CMV NAT and provides a timely review of the clinical utility of viral load testing in the management of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. Current limitations are highlighted, and avenues for further research are suggested to optimize the clinical application of NAT in the management of CMV after transplantation.