Background: Cognitive impairment is a frequent consequence of bipolar disorder (BD) that is difficult to prevent and treat. In addition, the quality of the preliminary evidence on the treatment of BD through Cognitive Remediation (CR) with traditional methods is poor. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a CR intervention with fully immersive Virtual Reality (VR) as an additional treatment for BD and offers preliminary data on its efficacy. Methods: Feasibility randomized controlled cross-over clinical study, with experimental condition lasting three months, crossed between two groups. Experimental condition: CR fully immersive VR recovery-oriented program plus conventional care; Control condition: conventional care. The control group began the experimental condition after a three months period of conventional care (waiting list). After the randomization of 50 people with BD diagnosis, the final sample consists of 39 participants in the experimental condition and 25 in the control condition because of dropouts. Results: Acceptability and tolerability of the intervention were good. Compared to the waitlist group, the experimental group reported a significant improvement regarding cognitive functions (memory: p = 0.003; attention: p = 0.002, verbal fluency: p = 0.010, executive function: p = 0.003), depressive symptoms (p = 0.030), emotional awareness (p = 0.007) and biological rhythms (p = 0.029). Conclusions: The results are preliminary and cannot be considered exhaustive due to the small sample size. However, the evidence of efficacy, together with the good acceptability of the intervention, is of interest. These results suggest the need to conduct studies with larger samples that can confirm this data. Trial registration: ClinicalTrialsgov NCT05070065, registered in September 2021

Introduction: Rehabilitative interventions employing technology play a crucial role in bipolar disorder (BD) treatment. The study aims to appraise the virtual reality (VR)-based cognitive remediation (CR) and the interpersonal rhythm approaches to treatment outcomes of BD across different age groups. Methods: Post-hoc analysis of a 12-week randomizedcontrolled cross-over feasibility trial involving people with mood disorders (BD, DSM-IV) aged 18–75 years old: thirty-nine exposed to the experimental VR-based CR vs 25 waiting list controls. People with BD relapse, epilepsy or severe eye diseases (due to the potential VR risks exposure) were excluded. Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN) was used to measure the outcome. Results: Cases and controls did not statistically significantly differ in age and sex distributions. Personal rhythm scores improved over the study follow-up in the experimental vs the control group (APC = 8.7%; F = 111.9; p < 0.0001), both in young (18–45 years) (APC = 5.5%; F = 70.46; p < 0.0001) and, to a lesser extent, older (>46 years) adults (APC = 10.5%; F = 12.110; p = 0.002). Conclusions: This study observed improved synchronization of personal and social rhythms in individuals with BD after a virtual reality cognitive remediation intervention, particularly in social activity, daily activities, and chronotype, with greater benefits in the younger population.

Background: Alexithymia, a predictor in chronic illnesses, like cardiovascular and bipolar disorder (CD–BD), could be improved with a virtual reality (VR) cognitive remediation program. This secondary analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates alexithymia improvement and its factors in an experimental group versus a control group, exploring extensions to individuals with comorbid non-psychiatric chronic conditions. Methods: A feasibility cross-over RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05070065) enrolled individuals aged 18–75 with mood disorders (BD, DSM-IV), excluding those with relapses, epilepsy, or severe eye conditions due to potential risks with VR. Alexithymia levels were measured using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale with 20 items (TAS-20). Results: The study included 39 individuals in the experimental group and 25 in the control group, with no significant age or sex differences observed. Significantly improved alexithymia scores were noted in the experimental group compared to controls (F = 111.9; p < 0.0001) and in subgroups with chronic non-psychiatric comorbidities (F = 4.293, p = 0.048). Scores were particularly improved for difficulty in identifying feelings (F = 92.42; p < 0.00001), communicating feelings (F = 61.34; p < 0.00001), and externally oriented thinking (F = 173.12; p < 0.00001). Conclusions: The findings highlight alexithymia enhancement in BD, even with comorbid non-psychiatric chronic diseases. Given its impact on BD progression and related conditions, like CD, developing and evaluating VR-based tools in this context is suggested by these findings.

Background: Emerging evidence indicates that some individuals recovering from COVID-19 develop persistent symptoms, including fatigue, pain, cognitive difficulties, and psychological distress, commonly known as Long COVID. These symptoms often overlap with those seen in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), underscoring the need for integrative, non-pharmacological interventions. This Phase II controlled trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-BF) in individuals with Long COVID who meet the diagnostic criteria for CFS/ME. Specific objectives included assessing feasibility indicators (drop-out rates, side effects, participant satisfaction) and changes in fatigue, depression, anxiety, pain, and health-related quality of life. Methods: Participants were assigned alternately and consecutively to the HRV-BF intervention or Treatment-as-usual (TAU), in a predefined 1:1 sequence (quasirandom assignment). The intervention consisted of 10 HRV-BF sessions, held twice weekly over 5 weeks, with each session including a 10 min respiratory preparation and 40 min of active training. Results: The overall drop-out rate was low (5.56%), and participants reported a generally high level of satisfaction. Regarding side effects, the mean total Simulator Sickness Questionnaire score was 24.31 (SD = 35.42), decreasing to 12.82 (SD = 15.24) after excluding an outlier. A significantly greater improvement in severe fatigue was observed in the experimental group (H = 4.083, p = 0.043). When considering all outcomes collectively, a tendency toward improvement was detected in the experimental group (binomial test, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: HRV-BF appears feasible and well tolerated. Findings support the need for Phase III trials to confirm its potential in mitigating fatigue in Long COVID.